2022 AP Bio FRQ: The Questions That Actually Messed People Up

2022 AP Bio FRQ: The Questions That Actually Messed People Up

Honestly, the 2022 AP Bio FRQ felt like a fever dream for a lot of students. One minute you're sitting in a quiet gym, and the next, you're staring at a table about cholera toxin and wondering if you actually know what a "control" is.

It wasn't just "hard." It was specific.

The College Board has a knack for taking concepts you think you've mastered—like osmosis or meiosis—and wrapping them in a scenario so weird you start second-guessing your own name. If you're looking back at these questions to study, or just trying to figure out why your score was what it was, you've gotta look at the "why" behind the points.

Why Question 1 Was a Total Curveball

Question 1 is always the "beast." It’s long, it’s worth 8 to 10 points, and in 2022, it was all about cell communication and signaling. Specifically, it focused on how cholera toxin messes with G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs).

You’d think a question about a toxin would be straightforward. Nope.

The prompt forced you to connect the dots between cAMP production, GTP binding, and—oddly enough—tonicity. Part (a) asked why chloride ions leaving a cell causes water loss. If you didn't mention that the extracellular space becomes hypertonic (or has a lower water potential), you basically threw a point in the trash.

The Independent Variable Trap

A lot of people got tripped up on identifying the independent variable. Most students just wrote "cholera toxin."

That’s only half right.

Technically, the independent variable is the presence or absence of the toxin. It seems like a tiny nitpick, but in the world of AP Biology, the "range of options" matters. If you're prepping for future exams, always describe the variable as the thing you're changing or comparing, not just the name of the substance.


The Corn and Crossing Over: Question 2

If Question 1 was about signaling, Question 2 was the "math and graphing" monster. It dealt with double-strand breaks and crossing over in corn.

This is where the 2022 AP Bio FRQ really tested your ability to handle data. You had a table with six strains of corn, the number of breaks, and the average number of crossovers. You had to graph it.

📖 Related: Celebrating Eid al Fitr in America: What the Mainstream Media Usually Misses

  • Pro Tip: If a question gives you $\pm 2 SE_{\bar{x}}$ (standard error), you better put those error bars on your graph.
  • If you forgot the labels for the x and y axes, you lost easy points.
  • The relationship was a clear positive correlation, but you had to be specific about what was increasing with what.

One of the weirder parts of this question asked about the process that causes the DNA breaks. The answer? Enzymatic hydrolysis. A lot of students guessed "mutation" or "random chance," but the test wanted the actual chemical mechanism (breaking those covalent bonds in the sugar-phosphate backbone).

Short FRQs: Where the Points Go to Die

The short-form questions (3 through 6) are supposed to be "easier," but they’re usually where people run out of time or get too vague.

Question 3: Enzymes and Gibberellin

This one looked at how GA3 affects enzyme activity in barley seeds. It’s a classic Unit 3 topic (Cellular Energetics/Enzymes). You had to identify the "why" behind a negative control. Why use a sample without the hormone? To show that the hormone is actually the thing causing the change. Simple, right? Yet, under pressure, people forget to state the obvious.

Question 5: Invasive Species and Community

This was the "Ecology" question. It asked about what makes a community vulnerable to an invasive species. A common mistake here was being too "common sense." You couldn't just say "there's no food." You had to use the terminology—mentioning a lack of natural predators or empty niches.


The mRNA Half-Life Surprise (Question 6)

Question 6 was the sleeper hit of the 2022 AP Bio FRQ. It dealt with gene expression and how the length of the poly-A tail affects mRNA stability.

📖 Related: What Time is Sunset in Chicago IL: Why the Golden Hour Shifts So Fast

Basically, the longer the tail, the longer the mRNA survives before getting chewed up by enzymes. If the mRNA lasts longer, you get more protein.

It sounds logical when you read it now, but in the middle of a 90-minute FRQ session, trying to explain the "mechanisms of post-transcriptional modification" feels like trying to explain quantum physics to a cat.

How to Not Fail the Next One

If you're using the 2022 exam as a practice run, keep these things in mind:

  1. Task Verbs are King: If it says "Identify," give a one-word answer. If it says "Explain" or "Justify," you need a "because" in there.
  2. Don't Restate the Prompt: The graders have read the question 5,000 times. They don't need you to repeat it. Jump straight to the answer.
  3. Use the Equation Sheet: For the calculation parts (like the percent change in Question 1), don't wing the math. Use the $\frac{Final - Initial}{Initial} \times 100$ formula provided.
  4. Label Everything: If you're drawing a graph, it needs a title, labeled axes with units, a consistent scale, and accurately plotted points.

The 2022 FRQs showed that the College Board is moving away from "what is this?" and moving toward "what happens if I break this?" It's all about disruptions. Whether it's a toxin, a mutation, or an invasive species, you have to be able to predict the ripple effect through a biological system.

✨ Don't miss: The 5 Second Rule Explained (Simply): How One Countdown Can Actually Rewire Your Brain

The best way to master this is to stop memorizing definitions and start asking "and then what?" after every process you learn.

Take Action Now

Go back to the official 2022 AP Biology Scoring Guidelines on the College Board website. Look at the specific phrases they "Accept." You'll notice they often accept multiple ways of saying the same thing, but they always require the correct biological terminology. Practice writing your own responses to Question 1 and Question 2, then grade yourself harshly against those guidelines. It’s the only way to see where your logic is leaking points.