So, here we are in 2026, and everyone is still obsessing over that thirty-second window of television. You know the one. It costs more than a literal mansion in Malibu.
Ads during the Super Bowl are basically the only time people actually want to be sold something. Honestly, it’s a weird cultural phenomenon. We spend all year paying for ad-free streaming, but come February, we’re huddled around a bowl of lukewarm buffalo chicken dip specifically to see if a beer company can make us cry using a horse and a puppy.
But if you think these companies are just throwing money at the wall to see what sticks, you're missing the real math behind the madness. It's not just about "brand awareness." It's a calculated, high-stakes gamble that often fails—and when it fails, it fails in front of 127 million people.
The Eight Million Dollar 30-Second Gamble
Last year, for Super Bowl LIX in 2025, the price tag for a 30-second spot officially hit an average of $8 million. That is roughly $266,000 per second. Think about that for a second. In the time it takes you to sneeze, a brand just spent enough to buy a nice condo in the Midwest.
FOX, who aired the 2025 game, reportedly saw some of those spots go for even more—north of $8.5 million in some cases. It's easy to look at that and think, there is no way a bag of chips can sell enough to make that back. But you’ve got to look at the "Spike and Sustain" effect.
Research from firms like EDO and YouGov shows that a successful ad doesn't just sell product that night. It triggers a massive spike in search volume. For example, during the 2025 game, brands like Poppi and Liquid Death saw their "Ad Impact Scores" skyrocket. Poppi, a prebiotic soda, saw an 11% jump in brand awareness and a significant lift in purchase consideration. For a brand that isn't a household name yet, that $8 million is essentially an entry fee into the national consciousness.
💡 You might also like: Why Every Letter of Rec Template Is Kinda Broken (And How to Fix Yours)
Why 2025 Was the Year of "The Familiar"
If you watched the ads last year, you probably noticed a lot of faces you recognized. Like, a lot.
The 2025 ad cycle was dominated by what experts call "safe bets." Brands were terrified of being too edgy or political. Instead, they leaned into nostalgia and established celebrity pairings. We saw Meg Ryan and Billy Crystal reunite for Hellmann's in a cheeky callback to When Harry Met Sally. It worked because it was simple. It didn't try to solve world peace; it just told you that mayo makes a sandwich better.
Then there was the "eyebrow" ad. Little Caesars brought in Eugene Levy and his daughter Sarah. People loved it. According to iSpot.tv, it was one of the top-ranked ads for "likability." Why? Because it was funny without being mean, and it featured a product (pizza) that people were literally eating while watching the commercial.
- The Winners: Pfizer's "Knock Out" spot featuring LL Cool J actually topped the likeability charts for 2025. It managed to be inspiring without being "preachy," which is a very hard needle to thread.
- The Tech Reality: While companies like OpenAI and Google (with their "Dream Job" in-house production) showed up, viewers actually gravitated more toward "tangible" tech. T-Mobile’s partnership with Starlink to provide satellite-powered wireless service drove 1,163% more engagement than the average spot. People want things that solve their actual problems, not just cool-looking AI demos.
The "Celebrity Effect" is Actually Dying
Here is the twist that most people get wrong. Even though brands are spending millions on A-listers, the actual impact of those celebrities is thinning out.
Ipsos data recently revealed that celebrity "distinctive assets"—the stuff that makes an ad stick in your brain—now offer almost zero additional lift for brand attention compared to a few years ago. We’re reaching "peak celebrity." When every single ad has a movie star, no one stands out.
👉 See also: Finding the IRS in Columbia SC: What Most People Get Wrong About Visiting the Strom Thurmond Building
Remember the 2025 Pringles ad? It had Adam Brody, Nick Offerman, James Harden, and Andy Reid. That’s a massive amount of star power. But it was actually ranked as "the rest" by some critics because it felt cluttered. Sometimes, having five famous people in thirty seconds just makes the viewer forget what you're actually selling.
Compare that to the 2025 Lay's ad. It featured a young girl farming potatoes. It was quiet, inspiring, and 33% more effective than the average benchmark. No Hollywood paycheck required.
The Hidden Logistics of Super Bowl LX (2026)
As we look toward Super Bowl LX in Santa Clara, the landscape is shifting again. NBCUniversal already confirmed they sold out their inventory months ago.
We already know some of the big players. Budweiser is going back to its "Made of America" roots—basically the advertising equivalent of comfort food. Cadillac is using the game to debut their Formula One livery, which is a massive pivot for a brand trying to look younger and faster. And interestingly, Ferrero is making its debut with Kinder Bueno.
But the real battle isn't happening on the TV screen. It's happening on the "second screen."
Over 70% of people watching the game are also on their phones. If a brand spends $8 million on a TV spot but doesn't have a TikTok strategy to match, they're lighting money on fire. In 2025, brands like Carl’s Jr. found that partnering with influencers like Alix Earle for "behind-the-scenes" content resulted in a 91% follower growth. The TV ad is the "spike," but the social media campaign is the "sustain."
Does It Actually Move the Needle?
The Stanford Graduate School of Business did a study on this, and the results were... complicated. They found that for established brands like Budweiser, these ads can generate an extra $96 million in revenue, which is a massive 172% return on investment.
However, if two direct competitors both run huge ads—say, Coke and Pepsi—they often just cancel each other out. They spend $16 million combined just to stay exactly where they were in the market. It’s a defensive play. You don't advertise because you want to win; you advertise because you're afraid of losing.
Real Actions for Brands (and Curious Viewers)
If you're looking at the world of ads during the Super Bowl and wondering what to take away, keep these points in mind:
1. Watch the "Second Screen" First. If you want to see who is actually winning the night, don't look at the TV. Look at what's trending on TikTok and X (formerly Twitter) five minutes after the ad airs. That's the real metric of success.
2. Complexity is the Enemy. The most successful ads in 2025 (like the Booking.com Muppets spot) had one single, clear message. If you have to explain the joke or the premise, you've already lost.
💡 You might also like: Jacob Lew and the 2013 Secretary of the Treasury Transition: What Really Happened
3. The 4-Day Rule. Most of the "buzz" from a Super Bowl ad disappears within six hours. By day four, it’s basically gone. The brands that "win" the Super Bowl are the ones that have follow-up ads ready to go for the rest of February.
4. Diversity Matters. One of the biggest criticisms of the 2025 ads was a lack of diversity, with nearly 40% of ads failing to feature people of color in meaningful ways. Brands that ignore the actual demographic of the 120+ million people watching are leaving money on the table.
The Super Bowl is no longer just a football game; it's the world’s most expensive focus group. Whether it’s a talking baby, a CGI penguin, or a nostalgic movie reunion, the goal remains the same: make us remember the name when we're standing in the grocery aisle three days later.
Focus on how brands bridge the gap between the TV screen and your smartphone. The real "Super Bowl winner" is usually the company that manages to stay in your algorithm long after the stadium lights have gone out.