Bank of America and Ripple: What Most People Get Wrong

Bank of America and Ripple: What Most People Get Wrong

You've probably seen the headlines. Some "insider" on X (formerly Twitter) claims Bank of America is secretly moving trillions of dollars using XRP every single night. Or maybe you've heard the opposite—that the partnership is dead in the water, buried under years of SEC litigation and corporate red tape.

The truth is somewhere in the middle. It is less flashy than the moon-boy theories but far more interesting for anyone tracking the future of how money moves.

Bank of America and Ripple have been "dating" for a long time. This isn't a new fling. We are talking about a relationship that traces back to at least 2016, when the bank joined Ripple’s Global Payments Steering Group. Since then, it’s been a slow-burn saga of patents, pilots, and very carefully worded press releases.

The Partnership That Never Quite Went "All In"

Let’s clear the air on the biggest misconception first: Bank of America is not using XRP for its internal settlement. Not yet, anyway.

While some viral clips from early 2025 suggested the bank had flipped a switch to 100% XRP adoption, those claims were never verified by the bank’s headquarters in Charlotte. Honestly, a Tier 1 US bank moving its entire treasury to a volatile digital asset overnight would be a regulatory suicide mission.

What is actually happening is a deep integration of Ripple’s underlying technology—specifically the messaging and tracking tools formerly known as xCurrent.

📖 Related: Who is Jerome Powell married to: What most people get wrong about Elissa Leonard

Think of it like this: Bank of America is using the "pipes" Ripple built to make international payments faster and more transparent, but they are still mostly running "water" (fiat currency) through those pipes. They want the speed of blockchain without the price swings of a token.

Why the SEC Lawsuit Changed Everything

For a few years there, the momentum felt stalled. The SEC v. Ripple battle was a massive shadow hanging over every US-based financial institution.

If you're a compliance officer at a massive bank, you aren't going to sign off on a partnership with a company the government is actively suing for billions of dollars. You just won't. It’s too much career risk.

But things shifted. The 2024 ruling and the subsequent 2025 settlement changed the vibe. Once a judge clarified that XRP itself isn't a security when traded on exchanges, the "legal risk" bucket got a lot lighter.

Suddenly, Ripple wasn't the industry pariah anymore. They were the battle-tested survivor.

The New Player: RLUSD and the Stablecoin Pivot

Here is the detail most people are missing. The "Bank of America and Ripple" story in 2026 isn't just about XRP. It’s about RLUSD.

Ripple launched its own US Dollar-backed stablecoin, and that changed the math for big banks. Institutions like Bank of America love the efficiency of the XRP Ledger, but they hate the volatility of the XRP token.

  • XRP: Can drop 10% in an hour. Terrifying for a bank.
  • RLUSD: It’s a dollar. Boring. Stable. Perfect for settlement.

We are seeing a trend where banks use Ripple's infrastructure to move stablecoins rather than the native bridge asset. It gives them the 24/7 settlement they crave without the headache of explaining a $200 million price fluctuation to the Board of Directors.

Patents Tell the Real Story

If you want to know what a bank is actually thinking, don't read their marketing. Read their patents.

Bank of America has filed dozens of patents related to distributed ledger technology (DLT) that specifically reference Ripple’s architecture. One famous patent involves a "real-time net settlement system" that looks suspiciously like Ripple’s On-Demand Liquidity (ODL) model.

They are building the foundation. You don't spend millions on R&D and patent filings for a "pilot program" if you don't intend to eventually use the tech at scale.

The SWIFT Problem

Why does any of this matter? Because the current system—SWIFT—sorta sucks.

If you want to send $50,000 to a supplier in Singapore today, that money travels through three different "correspondent" banks. Each one takes a fee. Each one takes 24 hours to "verify" the transaction. It’s basically sending an email by printing it out and mailing it.

Ripple cuts the middleman. Bank of America knows that if they don't modernize, companies like Wise or even newer fintechs using crypto rails will eat their lunch.

✨ Don't miss: New 50 dollar note: What Most People Get Wrong

What’s Actually Happening Right Now?

As of early 2026, Bank of America is a confirmed member of RippleNet. They use the network for specific payment corridors, likely focusing on high-friction routes like US-to-Mexico or parts of Southeast Asia.

They are also keeping a very close eye on the Federal Reserve’s own "FedNow" service. There’s a bit of a race happening between private blockchain solutions and government-backed instant payment rails.

Actionable Insights for the Savvy Observer

If you are trying to play the long game here, stop looking for "Breaking News" tweets and start looking for these three indicators:

  1. Volume Shifts: Watch the total volume on the XRP Ledger. If it spikes during US banking hours, that’s institutional money moving, regardless of which bank is doing it.
  2. Regulatory Progress: Keep an eye on the GENIUS Act and other US crypto legislation. The more "safe harbor" rules we get, the more likely BofA is to expand their Ripple usage.
  3. The Stablecoin War: If RLUSD becomes a standard for institutional settlement, Ripple wins even if XRP stays at a lower price point for longer than fans want.

Basically, the "partnership" is a slow, methodical integration into the world's most boring (but most important) financial plumbing. It’s not a moonshot; it’s an upgrade.

Keep your expectations grounded. Bank of America is a giant ship. It doesn't turn on a dime. But it is definitely steaming toward a blockchain-integrated future, and Ripple is providing the engine.

Monitor the quarterly earnings calls from Bank of America for any mention of "distributed ledger efficiency" or "real-time cross-border settlements." That is where the real confirmation lives. Also, watch for Ripple’s expansion into national bank charters, which would put them on an even playing field with the legacy giants they are trying to help.