Stories are everywhere. You hear them at the bar when your friend describes a terrible date, you see them in $100 million Netflix pilots, and you definitely feel them when a work presentation starts dragging. But most people mess up the beginning middle and end because they treat them like checkboxes. They think if they just put events in order, they've got a narrative. Honestly? They don't.
Aristotle started this whole mess over two thousand years ago in Poetics. He argued that a "whole" must have a beginning, middle, and end. It sounds obvious. Insultingly simple, even. Yet, most modern writers—from novelists to YouTubers—struggle because they don't understand the function of these segments. A beginning isn't just "the start." It’s an invitation. A middle isn't "the stuff that happens." It’s a series of escalating complications. And an end? It’s not just stopping. It’s the inevitable result of everything that came before.
Structure matters. Without it, you’re just listing chores.
The Hook: Why Your Beginning Is Usually Too Late
Most stories start too early. Writers feel this weird urge to show the "normal life" of a character for forty pages before anything actually happens. That’s a mistake. You’ve probably heard of the In Medias Res technique—starting in the middle of the action—but even if you don’t start with a literal explosion, the beginning middle and end of your narrative must establish stakes immediately.
Take Kurt Vonnegut. He famously said writers should be "sadists" to their characters. In his view, the beginning's job is to introduce a character who wants something, and then immediately put a hurdle in their way. If your beginning is just backstory, your audience is already reaching for their phone. You need a "Point of Attack." This is the moment the status quo is shattered. In The Godfather, it’s not just a wedding; it’s a wedding where a desperate man asks for a murder. That sets the tone. It creates a "narrative hook" that keeps the reader from wandering off.
I’ve noticed that people get stuck on the "inciting incident." They think it has to be a dragon attacking a village. It doesn't. It just has to be a change. A phone call. A flat tire. A weird look from a boss. The beginning ends when the protagonist can no longer go back to the way things were. They are committed. They've crossed the threshold.
The "Muddle": Surviving the Middle Without Losing the Audience
The middle is the hardest part. Period. It's often called the "sagging middle" because that’s where the momentum goes to die. If the beginning middle and end were a bridge, the middle would be the long, shaky span over the canyon.
So how do you fix it? You use "No, and" or "Yes, but."
Screenwriters like Trey Parker and Matt Stone (the South Park guys) talk about this constantly. If the words "and then" fit between your scenes, your middle is failing. "The hero went to the store, and then he met a girl, and then they went to dinner." That’s boring. It should be: "The hero went to the store, but it was being robbed. He tried to help, but he accidentally knocked himself out. He woke up in a hospital, and the nurse was actually a secret agent."
That is the essence of the middle. It’s a series of trials. In Joseph Campbell’s The Hero with a Thousand Faces, this is the "Road of Trials." It’s where the character learns the skills they need for the finale. If they win too easily in the middle, there’s no tension. They need to fail. They need to lose their sword, their car, or their dignity.
Nuance is key here. A lot of people think the middle is just filler until the big fight at the end. It's not. The middle is where the theme lives. If your story is about courage, the middle should be about all the different ways a person can be a coward. It's about testing the character's soul. If you skip the emotional labor of the middle, the ending won't feel earned. It’ll just feel like a sequence of events.
The Climax: The Beginning Middle and End Conclusion
The end is a payoff. It’s the answer to the question you asked in the beginning. If the beginning asks, "Will John find his missing dog?", the end shouldn't just be "Yes." It should be "Yes, but he realized he actually preferred cats," or "Yes, but he had to become a different person to do it."
A great ending feels inevitable yet surprising. Think about The Sixth Sense. When you see the ending, you realize the beginning middle and end were all perfectly aligned to lead to that one moment. You just didn't see it coming. That’s the "Plant and Payoff" mechanic. You plant a seed in the beginning (a throwaway line, a weird habit), and it blooms in the end.
There’s also this concept of the "Circular Narrative." Some of the best endings bring us back to the start, but with a new perspective. The character returns to their porch, but they see the sunset differently. They are changed. If the character is the same person at the end as they were at the beginning, you didn't write a story; you wrote an anecdote.
Real-World Application: It's Not Just for Movies
Business leaders use this. Look at Steve Jobs’ 2005 Stanford commencement speech. He didn’t just list facts. He structured it into three distinct stories—a beginning, middle, and end for each. He started with his birth and being given up for adoption (The Beginning/The Struggle), moved to dropping out of college and starting Apple (The Middle/The Trial), and ended with his cancer diagnosis and thoughts on mortality (The End/The Resolution).
👉 See also: The Last Tycoon Novel: Why F. Scott Fitzgerald's Unfinished Mess is Actually His Best Work
Because he used a narrative arc, people remember that speech decades later. If he had used a PowerPoint with bullet points, it would have been forgotten by lunch.
Humans are hardwired for this. Our brains seek patterns. We want to see a cause and an effect. When you organize information into a beginning middle and end, you aren't just being "artsy." You're actually making it easier for the human brain to encode that information into long-term memory.
Common Pitfalls That Ruin the Arc
People often overcomplicate things. They try to subvert expectations before they even know what the expectations are.
- The False Start: Starting with a dream sequence. Just don't. It cheapens the beginning because the stakes aren't real.
- The Deus Ex Machina: This is when the end is solved by something that wasn't established in the middle. A literal god descending from the clouds to save the hero. It’s unsatisfying.
- The "And Then" Loop: As mentioned, just listing events. It’s the death of interest.
- The Inconclusive Ending: Unless you are a master of French New Wave cinema, give people a resolution. Life is messy and doesn't have endings; that's exactly why we go to stories—to see a world that actually makes sense for once.
Actionable Steps for Your Next Story
If you’re sitting down to write a blog post, a script, or even a long email to your boss, try this framework. It’s better than any "ultimate guide" template you’ll find online.
- Identify the Status Quo: What is the "before" state? Spend exactly enough time here to make the change feel significant. Usually, this is about 10% of your total length.
- Define the Inciting Incident: What happens that makes "business as usual" impossible? This should happen early. If it's a 1000-word article, the shift should happen by word 150.
- Map the Complications: List three things that go wrong in the middle. Don't make them random. Each failure should be a direct result of the character's (or your) previous attempt to fix things. This is the "But" or "Therefore" logic.
- Find the Turning Point: This is the "All Is Lost" moment. The point where it looks like the beginning's goal won't be reached.
- Execute the Resolution: How is the conflict resolved? Ensure the answer comes from within the story's established rules. If you’re writing a business case study, the "resolution" is the data showing the success of the new strategy.
- Verify the Transformation: Look at your start and your finish. Is there a gap? Is the "after" state fundamentally different from the "before"? If the answer is no, go back to the middle and make the trials harder.
The beginning middle and end structure isn't a cage; it's a skeleton. You can put whatever "meat" you want on it—sci-fi, romance, corporate strategy—but without those bones, the whole thing just collapses into a heap. Keep it simple. Keep it moving. And for heaven's sake, make sure something actually changes by the time you hit the final period.
Storytelling is an ancient technology. It’s survived for thousands of years because it works. When you respect the arc, your audience respects your message. It’s that basic. Now, go look at your current project. Find the middle. If it feels like a list, start breaking things. Your story will thank you for it.
📖 Related: Why Let's Get Harry Still Matters to Action Fans 40 Years Later
Next Steps for Implementation:
- Audit your current draft: Highlight your inciting incident. If it's past the first 20% of your word count, cut the intro.
- Check your transitions: Replace every "and then" with "but" or "therefore" to ensure causal links between scenes.
- Define the change: Write down exactly how your protagonist (or your reader's understanding) has shifted from the first paragraph to the last. If you can't name the shift, the arc is flat.