Catholic Presidents of USA: Why There Are Only Two and Why It Took So Long

Catholic Presidents of USA: Why There Are Only Two and Why It Took So Long

It’s actually kinda wild when you think about it. For a country that prides itself on being a melting pot, the list of Catholic presidents of USA is incredibly short. Just two names. That's it. John F. Kennedy and Joe Biden.

For over 160 years, it was essentially an unwritten rule that a Catholic couldn't win the White House. People were legitimately terrified that a Catholic president would take orders directly from the Pope in Rome. It sounds like a weird conspiracy theory now, but back in the day, it was mainstream political thought. It wasn't just some fringe idea; it was a deeply baked-in prejudice that shaped the American landscape for generations.

The Long Road to JFK

Before Kennedy broke the glass ceiling in 1960, there was Al Smith. Smith was the Governor of New York and ran in 1928. He got absolutely crushed. Why? Because he was a "Wet" (he opposed Prohibition) and, more importantly, he was a Catholic. The attacks against him were brutal. People actually circulated photos of the Holland Tunnel and claimed it was a secret underwater passage Smith was building to link the White House to the Vatican so the Pope could commute to work.

Smith’s loss reinforced the idea that being Catholic was a political death sentence.

🔗 Read more: What Started the Fires in Los Angeles: The Truth Behind the SoCal Blazes

Then came 1960. John F. Kennedy didn't just have to beat Richard Nixon; he had to beat the "Catholic Question." He had to go to Houston and give a famous speech to a room full of Protestant ministers. He basically told them, "I am not the Catholic candidate for president. I am the Democratic Party’s candidate for president, who happens also to be a Catholic." He had to promise—very explicitly—that his religious views wouldn't dictate his policy.

The margin was razor-thin. Kennedy won, but it wasn’t some landslide victory for religious tolerance. Many historians, like Shaun Casey in The Making of a Catholic President, argue that Kennedy’s faith almost cost him the whole thing. He actually lost several states he should have won because of anti-Catholic sentiment in the rural South and Midwest.

The 60-Year Gap

You’d think once JFK won, the floodgates would open. Nope. It took sixty years for another one of the Catholic presidents of USA to take the oath of office. Joe Biden’s 2020 victory felt different, though. While JFK had to distance himself from his church to survive politically, Biden leaned into it. You see him with his rosary beads. You see him at Mass almost every Sunday.

The political math had shifted. By 2020, the "Vatican takeover" fears had mostly evaporated, replaced by a new kind of tension: the "Culture War."

Biden’s Catholicism is a point of friction not with Protestants, but with the leaders of his own church. Unlike Kennedy, who faced external pressure from outside his faith, Biden faces internal pressure. Because of his stance on reproductive rights, some American bishops have even discussed denying him Communion. It’s a fascinating flip of the script. Kennedy had to prove he wouldn't listen to the bishops; Biden has to navigate the fact that he doesn't always agree with them.

Why the identity changed

The American Catholic identity isn't a monolith anymore. In the 19th century, being Catholic meant you were likely an Irish, Italian, or Polish immigrant living in a city. You voted Democrat. You lived in a specific neighborhood. Today, Catholic voters are one of the most important "swing" demographics in the country. They split almost 50-50 between Republicans and Democrats.

This internal diversity is why there haven't been more Catholic presidents. The "Catholic vote" doesn't just automatically line up behind a Catholic candidate. In 2004, John Kerry—another Catholic—lost to George W. Bush. A huge chunk of the Catholic electorate actually went for Bush because they felt he aligned better with their "moral values" on social issues.

The Protestant Default

If you look at the other 44 guys who held the job, they are almost entirely Protestant. Episcopalians and Presbyterians dominate the list. It’s basically the "default" setting for American power.

We often talk about the separation of church and state, but for the longest time, the U.S. was "culturally" Protestant. The King James Bible was the standard in schools. Public prayers were Protestant prayers. To many Americans in the 1800s, being a "good American" was synonymous with being a "good Protestant." Catholicism was viewed as an "Old World" religion—monarchical, hierarchical, and suspicious of democracy.

Realities of the Modern Electorate

Today, the religious landscape is changing again. The fastest-growing "religious" group in the U.S. isn't a church at all—it’s the "Nones," people who don't identify with any organized religion.

But even with the rise of the secular voter, the Catholic presidents of USA represent a massive shift in what the "establishment" looks like. It’s no longer a disqualifier. In fact, many voters now find Biden’s public faith comforting, seeing it as a sign of personal character rather than a threat to the Constitution.

However, we shouldn't assume the bias is totally gone. It’s just mutated. Now, instead of "Are you a pawn of the Pope?" the question is "Are you the right kind of Catholic?" If a candidate is too devout, they get heat from the left. If they aren't devout enough on specific issues, they get heat from the right. It's a tightrope walk that JFK never really had to deal with in the same way because, back then, the church was more unified in the public eye.

How to Understand This History

If you're trying to make sense of how religion and the presidency collide, you have to look at the specific moments in time.

  1. 1928 (Al Smith): Pure, unadulterated anti-immigrant and anti-Catholic bias. The country wasn't ready.
  2. 1960 (JFK): The "Cold War" context. Kennedy argued that his freedom of conscience was an American value that stood against "godless communism."
  3. 2004 (John Kerry): The rise of the "Life" issues. Kerry’s faith became a liability because of his policy positions, not because of the Pope.
  4. 2020 (Joe Biden): Faith as a "healing" force. Biden used his Catholicism to project empathy and traditional values during a time of massive social unrest.

It’s also worth noting that the Supreme Court is currently dominated by Catholics. This is a massive irony. The branch of government that was once the most shielded from "popery" is now where it’s most prevalent. This shows that the institutional barriers have crumbled, even if the executive branch remains harder to crack.

What This Means for the Future

Will we see more Catholic presidents of USA soon? Probably. The path has been cleared. But the "Catholic candidate" of the future won't look like Kennedy. They probably won't even look like Biden. They will likely be part of the growing Hispanic Catholic population, which is fundamentally reshaping the politics of states like Florida, Texas, and Arizona.

The takeaway here is that religious identity in the White House is less about theology and more about sociology. It's about who "belongs" at the table. For a long time, Catholics didn't. Now they do, but the table itself is much more crowded and the rules of engagement have changed.

Actionable Insights for the Politically Curious

If you want to dive deeper into how this actually works on the ground, don't just look at the presidents. Look at the "VP" slot. Selecting a Catholic running mate has been a common strategy for decades to balance a ticket.

  • Check the voting records: Look at how the "Catholic Vote" shifted between 2016 and 2024. You'll see it’s not a monolith; it’s a mirror of the country’s divisions.
  • Read the "Houston Speech": Find the transcript of JFK’s 1960 address to the ministers. It’s a masterclass in political communication and defending the separation of church and state.
  • Watch the "Communion" debates: Follow the news regarding the USCCB (United States Conference of Catholic Bishops) and their statements on public officials. It’s the best way to see the modern tension between faith and policy.
  • Study the "Smith-Hoover" election: If you want to see how nasty American politics can get, look at the 1928 campaign posters. It’ll make today’s Twitter arguments look like a tea party.

The history of the presidency is a history of exclusion slowly turning into inclusion. We moved from "No Catholics allowed" to "Only if you promise not to listen to the Pope" to "My faith is my strength." It's a long arc, but it tells the story of America better than almost anything else.