The short answer? Yes.
Honestly, the idea that the Canada-U.S. border was a seamless, tax-free paradise before the political firestorms of the late 2010s is a bit of a myth. People often act like Donald Trump invented the concept of trade friction in North America. He didn't. He certainly cranked the volume up to eleven, but the "tariff walls" he talked about tearing down or rebuilding were already standing in some places—and had been for decades.
If you’ve ever wondered, did Canada have tariffs before Trump, you have to look past the "best friends" rhetoric. We’ve been trading partners since before we were even countries, but that doesn't mean it’s always been free.
The Pre-Trump Reality: Not Quite Free Trade
Before 2017, the trade relationship was governed by NAFTA (the North American Free Trade Agreement). Under NAFTA, most goods moved across the border without a cent of duty. But "most" isn't "all." Canada has always been fiercely protective of its "cultural sovereignty" and its farmers.
Take the dairy industry. This is usually the first thing people bring up. Canada uses a system called Supply Management. It’s a mechanism that controls how much milk, cheese, and poultry are produced to keep prices stable for farmers. To make that work, they have to block cheap imports.
How do they block them? Massive tariffs.
Before Trump ever took office, Canada had "over-quota" tariffs on dairy that could soar past 200% or even 300%. If an American dairy farmer wanted to sell more than the tiny "allowed" amount to Canadians, they hit a wall of taxes so high it made the trade impossible.
📖 Related: Jessica Cohen Douglas Elliman: Why the Powerhouse Move to BHS Matters
Beyond the Farm: The "Most Favored" Treatment
It’s easy to get lost in the weeds of trade law, but basically, Canada’s tariff structure has always been a multi-layered cake.
- NAFTA/CUSFTA Rates: For the U.S. and Mexico, duties were mostly zero.
- MFN Rates: "Most-Favored-Nation" status. This is the rate Canada gives to other members of the World Trade Organization (WTO). In 2016, Canada's weighted average tariff was about 1.56%.
- General Rates: These are the "default" taxes for countries Canada doesn't have a special deal with. Those can be 35% or higher.
So, while the U.S. enjoyed the best seat in the house, Canada was still collecting billions in duties every year. In 2017 alone, the Canadian government collected roughly $5.7 billion in import duties. That’s a lot of money for a "free trade" zone.
The Auto Pact and the 1965 Shakeup
Long before NAFTA, there was the 1965 Auto Pact. Before this agreement, Canadians paid significantly more for cars than Americans did—sometimes 50% more—partly because of high tariffs designed to protect tiny, inefficient Canadian branch plants.
The Auto Pact essentially created a single market for cars. It allowed parts and vehicles to zip across the border duty-free, provided certain "Canadian content" rules were met. This was the blueprint for the integration we see today. But even then, it wasn't a free-for-all. It was a managed, highly regulated "freedom."
Softwood Lumber: The War That Never Ends
If you want to know about trade tension before Trump, just ask a carpenter about Softwood Lumber.
This dispute has been raging since the 1980s. The U.S. argues that Canada "subsidizes" its timber industry because most Canadian forest land is owned by the government (Crown land), and they charge low "stumpage fees" to cut it down.
In retaliation, the U.S. has repeatedly slapped tariffs on Canadian wood. Canada, in turn, takes the U.S. to court at the WTO or under NAFTA’s dispute panels. This happened under Reagan, under Bush, and under Obama. It's a cyclical trade war that existed long before the current political era.
The Stealth Tariffs: Rules of Origin
Here is the thing most people miss: Rules of Origin.
🔗 Read more: United Auto Workers General Motors: Why This Long-Term Power Struggle Is Far From Over
Even if a tariff is 0%, you only get that rate if you can prove the product was actually made in North America. This is a massive administrative headache. If a Canadian company makes a shirt using fabric from China, that shirt might not qualify for "free trade" when it crosses into New York.
Before 2017, companies spent millions of dollars on lawyers and paperwork just to avoid "hidden" tariffs. If they couldn't prove where the thread came from, they paid the duty. It was a tax by another name.
Why Does It Matter Now?
Understanding that did Canada have tariffs before Trump is a "yes" helps contextualize the current chaos. The trade relationship isn't a natural state of grace that was suddenly broken. It's a fragile, heavily negotiated truce.
Canada has always used tariffs as a tool for industrial policy—whether it's protecting clothing manufacturers in Quebec or automotive workers in Ontario.
Actionable Insights for Navigating North American Trade
If you're doing business across the border or just trying to make sense of the news, keep these points in mind:
- Check the HS Code: Tariffs are tied to specific product codes. Even in a "free trade" era, your specific item might fall into a niche category with a residual tax.
- Don't Ignore Agriculture: If you are dealing in any "supply-managed" goods (dairy, eggs, poultry), the tariffs are still there and they are still astronomical.
- Audit Your Supply Chain: If your "Canadian" product uses 60% parts from overseas, you might be liable for duties under the USMCA (the NAFTA replacement) that you weren't expecting.
- Watch the "Surtaxes": Remember that governments can slap "countervailing duties" or "surtaxes" on products at any time if they feel the other side is cheating. These can appear overnight.
The border has never been truly "open." It's just that the gates used to be a little less rusty. Understanding the history of these taxes makes it clear that trade is never just about economics—it's always about politics.