It is 2026, and the story of the two guys who started a website in a Harvard dorm feels like ancient history. But honestly, the fallout between Eduardo Saverin and Mark Zuckerberg remains the ultimate blueprint for every messy startup divorce. You’ve seen the movie, right? The rain, the broken laptops, the screaming. Hollywood made it look like a Shakespearean tragedy fueled by a girl and a chicken, but the reality was way more corporate—and arguably colder.
Basically, it was a collision between two very different speeds of life. Zuckerberg was moving at the speed of code. Saverin was moving at the speed of a 2004 business internship.
The Harvard Handshake and the First $1,000
It started with a need for servers. Zuckerberg was a coding prodigy, but he didn't have the cash to keep a growing site alive. He turned to his friend Eduardo, a wealthy Brazilian econ major who had already made some serious money trading oil futures.
Saverin wrote the first check. It wasn't much—just $1,000 initially—but it was the oxygen the site needed to breathe.
In those early days, the roles were crystal clear:
- Mark Zuckerberg: The builder (65% stake).
- Eduardo Saverin: The business guy/CFO (30% stake).
- Dustin Moskovitz: The operator (5% stake).
They were friends. They were in the same fraternity. But the moment the site exploded beyond Harvard, the geography of their friendship shifted. Mark moved to Palo Alto to live the startup dream. Eduardo went to New York for a summer internship at Lehman Brothers. That gap? It was the beginning of the end.
Why Eduardo Saverin and Mark Zuckerberg Stopped Seeing Eye-to-Eye
While Mark was getting "CEO, Bitch" business cards printed and hanging out with Napster founder Sean Parker, Eduardo was still trying to sell ads for a site that Zuckerberg wanted to keep "cool."
The friction wasn't just about money. It was about commitment. Zuckerberg felt Eduardo was "lagging." He needed him to sign papers for reincorporation and investment, and Eduardo, stuck in New York and perhaps a bit wary of the Silicon Valley circus, wasn't moving fast enough.
Then came the "trap."
To get funding from Peter Thiel, Facebook had to move from a Florida LLC to a Delaware corporation. Zuckerberg used this restructuring to issue a massive amount of new shares. Everyone got their stake diluted a bit, but Eduardo’s was the only one that didn't have a "safety net." While Zuckerberg and Moskovitz’s stakes were protected or replenished, Saverin’s 30% was systematically crushed down to less than 10%, and eventually, effectively, to 0.03% before the legal fireworks began.
The $66 Billion Second Act
Most people think Eduardo Saverin just faded into the background after the 2009 settlement. Not even close. As of late 2025 and heading into 2026, Saverin is actually the wealthiest person in Singapore.
"I'm just going to cut him out and then settle with him."
That was a real IM Zuckerberg sent to a friend. He did exactly that. After a brutal legal battle where Saverin’s lawyers used Zuckerberg’s own emails against him, they settled. Saverin got his name back on the masthead as a "Co-Founder" and kept a stake of roughly 4% to 5%.
Today, that "small" percentage has turned him into one of the richest men on the planet. According to Forbes data from mid-2025, his net worth sits north of $66 billion.
What the History Books Miss
There's a common misconception that Eduardo is just a "lottery winner" who held onto Meta stock. That ignores his second act. In 2015, he co-founded B Capital Group with Raj Ganguly.
This wasn't a vanity project. B Capital now manages over $8 billion in assets. They aren't just throwing money at apps; they’re into heavy-duty tech like healthcare AI and logistics. While Zuckerberg has been battling the "Metaverse" PR nightmare and antitrust hearings for years, Saverin has built a private empire in Southeast Asia.
👉 See also: Why The Only Game in Town is Still the Scariest Phrase in Business
He lives a life of extreme privacy in Singapore. He renounced his U.S. citizenship in 2011—a move that caused a massive stir at the time because of the tax implications—but he’s maintained that it was about living where he worked, not dodging the IRS.
Lessons from the Fallout
If you're starting a company with a friend, the Eduardo Saverin and Mark Zuckerberg saga offers some pretty harsh, but necessary, takeaways:
- Vesting is Non-Negotiable: Never give a co-founder 30% of a company on day one without a vesting schedule. If Eduardo had been on a four-year vest, the dilution drama might never have happened because his shares would have been earned through continued work.
- Geography is Destiny: In the early stages, "out of sight" is "out of mind." If your co-founders are in a garage in California and you're in an office in New York, you aren't in the same company.
- Document Everything: Saverin won his settlement because Zuckerberg’s digital trail was a mess. In 2026, every Slack message and DM is a potential exhibit in a lawsuit.
The relationship between these two is likely nonexistent today. There are no "reunion" photos. No friendly tweets. Just two men who changed the world together for a few months and then spent years trying to erase each other from the story.
If you're looking to protect your own equity or navigate a partnership, start by formalizing your "What If" scenarios. Draft a Buy-Sell agreement and ensure your Intellectual Property (IP) assignments are signed early. Don't wait for the first million to arrive before you talk about what happens if one of you decides to take a summer internship.
Next Step for You: Check your current founder agreements. If you don't have a "Right of First Refusal" (ROFR) or clear dilution protections in your bylaws, bring it up with your legal counsel before your next funding round.