January 15, 1947. Los Angeles was cold, or at least as cold as it gets in Southern California. Betty Bersinger was walking her three-year-old daughter down South Norton Avenue when she saw what she thought was a discarded store mannequin. It wasn't. It was the body of 22-year-old Elizabeth Short, and the elizabeth short autopsy report that followed would become one of the most picked-apart documents in American history.
Honestly, the "Black Dahlia" case has become so much of a legend that people forget there’s a real, clinical document behind the lore. We’ve all heard the rumors about "surgical precision" and "HCP" (hemicorporectomy). But when you actually sit down and look at the findings of Dr. Frederick Newbarr, the Chief Autopsy Surgeon, the picture gets a lot more complicated—and a lot more human.
The Cold Reality of the Elizabeth Short Autopsy Report
When Dr. Newbarr stepped into the morgue on January 16, he wasn't looking at a movie star. He was looking at a 5'5", 115-pound woman with blue eyes and brown hair. People talk about her "ivory skin," but the report notes it was pale because the body had been completely drained of blood.
The killer hadn't just dumped her. They’d scrubbed her.
The report details that the body was severed completely at the waist. This wasn't a hack job, but it also wasn't necessarily a "master surgeon" at work, despite what every true crime documentary tells you. It was a technique taught in the 1930s. The cut went through the second and third lumbar vertebrae.
📖 Related: Paul Walker Photos: Why Those Blue Eyes and Fast Cars Still Rule the Internet
What’s truly haunting is the bruising—or lack thereof. Newbarr noted "very little" ecchymosis (bruising) along the waistline. This suggests the bisection happened after she was already dead.
The Smile and the Blows
The most famous—and arguably most disturbing—detail is the "Glasgow Smile." The report records 3-inch lacerations on the right side and 2.5-inch lacerations on the left, extending from the corners of her mouth toward her ears.
But here is the thing: the smile didn't kill her.
The official cause of death in the elizabeth short autopsy report is listed as hemorrhage and shock. Specifically, it was the result of "concussions of the brain" and "lacerations of the face." Her skull wasn't fractured, but she had been beaten severely on the right side of her head. There was significant bleeding in her subarachnoid space. Basically, she died from a combination of blunt force trauma to the head and the massive blood loss from the facial wounds.
Debunking the "Surgical Precision" Myth
You've probably heard that only a doctor could have done this. That’s a massive talking point for people who think Dr. George Hodel did it.
While the bisection was clean, many forensic experts have pointed out that a butcher or someone familiar with animal carcass processing could have achieved similar results. The "precision" is often overstated in pop culture to make the killer seem like a Moriarty-style genius. In reality, the report mentions several "superficial lacerations" on her arms and breasts. These were not the marks of a careful surgeon; they were the marks of a sadist.
🔗 Read more: Sean Combs and the Question of a Puff Daddy Wife: What Most People Get Wrong
Ligature Marks and Torture
One of the grimmest parts of the document is the mention of ligature marks. Newbarr found them on her wrists, her ankles, and her neck.
This tells us Elizabeth was alive and restrained for a significant amount of time before the final blows. She wasn't just killed; she was held. The report also mentions that her anal canal was dilated to 1.75 inches, leading to a suspicion of sexual assault, though no sperm was actually found during the examination. This lack of biological evidence was a massive hurdle for the LAPD back in '47.
What the Report Left Out (and Why)
The LAPD kept parts of the elizabeth short autopsy report under wraps for decades. Why? Because the killer was taunting them. They needed "hold-back" information—details only the murderer would know—to weed out the dozens of people who were calling in with fake confessions.
There's been a lot of talk about her stomach contents. Some sources claim it contained "fecal matter," suggesting a truly depraved level of forced ingestion. Other experts argue this was actually just the result of the body's natural processes after the bisection of the intestine. The official report mentions her stomach was mostly empty, save for a small amount of greenish-brown fluid.
The Teeth and the "Trashy" Reputation
Newbarr noted her teeth were "badly decayed." This might seem like a small detail, but it speaks to the reality of Elizabeth's life. She wasn't a pampered starlet. She was a girl struggling to get by in a post-war city, probably unable to afford basic dental care. The press at the time loved to paint her as a "good-time girl" or a "black widow," but the autopsy reveals the physical toll of a hard life.
Investigating the Evidence Yourself
If you’re looking to get a deeper sense of the forensics, you shouldn't just take a YouTuber's word for it. The case is still technically open, though obviously, anyone involved is long gone.
🔗 Read more: Johnny Chang Wife Yu Ling: What Most People Get Wrong
If you want to move beyond the sensationalism:
- Read the FBI Vault files: The FBI has released hundreds of pages related to their assistance in the case. It’s dry, but it’s the closest you’ll get to the primary source.
- Look at the crime scene photos (with caution): They are graphic, but they provide the context for Newbarr's descriptions of the "posing." The way the body was positioned—arms up, legs spread—was a deliberate message from the killer.
- Study the "Hemicorporectomy" technique: Research how this was taught in medical schools in the 40s. It might help you decide for yourself if it required a doctor’s touch or just a sharp knife and some anatomical knowledge.
The elizabeth short autopsy report remains a bridge between a human tragedy and a cultural myth. It doesn't give us a name, but it gives us a timeline. It tells us she was killed somewhere else, washed, drained, and then "gifted" to the city on that vacant lot. It’s a document of a girl who came to Hollywood for a dream and ended up as a clinical case study.