Tony Scott’s movies usually feel like a fever dream of high-octane cameras and fast-talking experts. But Enemy of the State? That one feels different. It’s 1998. Will Smith is at the peak of his "Fresh Prince" charm, and Gene Hackman is basically playing a grumpier version of his character from The Conversation.
Most people remember it as just another popcorn flick. They’re wrong.
It’s actually a terrifyingly accurate blueprint of the surveillance world we live in today. When Robert Clayton Dean, a suave labor lawyer, gets a disc shoved into his shopping bag by a panicked acquaintance, his entire life vanishes. His bank accounts? Frozen. His reputation? Shredded. His wife? Suspicious. It’s the ultimate "it could happen to you" story, wrapped in a Hollywood chase scene.
Honestly, watching it back in the late 90s felt like sci-fi. Now, it feels like a documentary.
The NSA Wasn't Supposed to Be the Villain
Back then, the National Security Agency (NSA) wasn't a household name like the FBI or CIA. Enemy of the State changed that. It put a face—a cold, bureaucratic face—on the idea of mass surveillance. Jon Voight plays Thomas Reynolds, an NSA official who’s willing to murder a congressman (played by Jason Robards) just to pass a piece of legislation called the Telecommunications Security and Privacy Act.
The irony is thick.
The movie posits that in the name of safety, we give up every shred of privacy. Reynolds represents the "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear" crowd, but the movie shows how easy it is for powerful people to make you look like you have something to hide.
They use satellites to track Will Smith's character in real-time. In 1998, critics called this "technobabble." They said it wasn't possible to have that kind of resolution from orbit. Fast forward to today’s world of Starlink and high-altitude imaging, and the movie looks like it was pulling punches.
Gene Hackman and the Brilliance of "Brill"
If Will Smith is the heart of the movie, Gene Hackman is the brain. His character, Edward "Brill" Lyle, is a former NSA communications analyst who went off the grid. He lives in "The Jar," a warehouse shielded by a copper mesh—a Faraday cage—to block electronic signals.
Brill is the one who delivers the hard truths. He’s the one who explains that if they want you, they’ll get you. He’s skeptical, paranoid, and entirely right.
What’s wild is how Hackman’s performance bridges the gap between the analog paranoia of the 70s and the digital dread of the 2000s. He uses old-school tradecraft to beat high-tech systems. It's a reminder that gadgets are only as good as the people operating them.
The dynamic between Smith’s character, who thinks the law will protect him, and Hackman’s character, who knows the law is a suggestion for the powerful, is where the movie finds its soul.
Technical Accuracy vs. Hollywood Magic
Let's be real for a second. Some of the tech in Enemy of the State is total nonsense.
Remember the scene where they "rotate" a 2D security camera feed to see behind a pillar? Yeah, that’s not how physics works. You can't just create data out of thin air. It’s the "enhance" trope taken to a ridiculous extreme.
✨ Don't miss: Sweet Smell of Success: Why This 1957 Box Office Failure Is Actually the Meanest Movie Ever Made
But where the movie gets it right is the intent and the methodology.
- Signals Intelligence: The way they intercept phone calls using keyword triggers.
- Metadata: They didn't call it that then, but tracking who Dean called and where he spent money is exactly how modern profiling works.
- Social Engineering: The NSA team doesn't just use computers; they lie to Dean's wife and manipulate his colleagues.
The film correctly predicted that the biggest threat to privacy wasn't just a guy in a dark room with a computer. It was the integration of every digital footprint we leave behind.
Why the "Telecommunications Security and Privacy Act" Matters
In the film, the fictional bill is the catalyst for the murder that starts the plot. The real-life parallel? The Patriot Act.
Only three years after the movie came out, the world changed. The debates about "security vs. liberty" that happen in the film's dialogue became the front-page news of the 2000s. Enemy of the State warned us about the "slippery slope," and then we collectively jumped off the cliff.
It’s a movie that asks: who watches the watchers?
Director Tony Scott uses a frenetic editing style—lots of quick cuts, zoom-ins, and grainy "satellite" shots—to make the viewer feel like they are being watched, too. You’re never just a spectator; you’re being tracked along with Will Smith.
Privacy is a Ghost
One of the most chilling lines in the movie is when Brill tells Dean, "You have no privacy. You have no rights. You're a ghost."
In the late 90s, that felt like a threat. Today, it’s just a Tuesday. We give up our location data for a weather app. We give up our browsing history for a 10% discount code. We’ve become our own surveillance state.
Enemy of the State wasn't just a thriller; it was a warning about the commodification of our personal lives. The "enemy" isn't just the government; it's the system that allows our data to be used as a weapon against us.
What You Can Learn from Robert Clayton Dean’s Nightmare
If you’re worried about your digital footprint after rewatching this classic, there are some actual things you can do. You don't need to build a copper-lined warehouse in Baltimore like Brill, but you can be smarter.
- Audit your permissions. Go through your phone. Does that flashlight app really need your location and contacts? Probably not.
- Use end-to-end encryption. The NSA in the movie had a field day with unencrypted lines. Use apps like Signal or ProtonMail.
- Physical security still matters. The "bug" in Dean’s shoe was a classic trope. Nowadays, it's your smart speaker or your doorbell camera. Be mindful of where you put them.
- Understand "Burner" culture. If you're doing something sensitive, don't use your primary device.
The movie ends with a massive shootout in a kitchen, which is great for cinema, but in real life, the "enemy" usually wins by simply hitting "delete" on your digital existence.
Stay skeptical. Keep your software updated. And maybe, just maybe, don't take a random disc from a guy in a lingerie store.
Actionable Takeaways for Digital Privacy
To protect yourself in a world that looks more like Enemy of the State every day, start by diversifying your digital life. Move away from "all-in-one" ecosystems where one company has your mail, your location, and your photos. Look into hardware security keys (like YubiKeys) to prevent account takeovers. Finally, check out the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) for up-to-date guides on how to defend your digital rights against real-world Thomas Reynolds types.