You've been there. You're trying to describe a situation that was already bad, but then something happened—a bad decision, a clumsy comment, a literal rainstorm—and suddenly everything is ten times more chaotic. You need the perfect word for to make worse.
Most people just default to "exacerbate." It’s the smart-sounding choice, right? But honestly, using "exacerbate" when you actually mean "aggravate" or "inflame" is a quick way to sound like you're trying too hard without actually being precise. Precision matters because language shapes how we perceive the severity of a problem. If you tell your boss you "exacerbated" a client's frustration, that sounds like a clinical error. If you say you "aggravated" them, it sounds like you were poking a bear with a stick.
Words are tools. Use the wrong one, and you’re basically trying to hammer a nail with a screwdriver.
The Heavy Hitter: Exacerbate vs. Aggravate
Let's clear this up immediately. Exacerbate is your go-to for conditions, diseases, or abstract problems. It comes from the Latin exacerbare, meaning "to make harsh." Think of it as adding fuel to a fire that was already smoldering. If you have asthma and you go for a run in a smoggy city, the pollution will exacerbate your symptoms. It makes the "badness" more intense.
Aggravate, on the other hand, is often used interchangeably, but purists (and many style guides like the Associated Press) argue it should be reserved for making a heavy burden even heavier. Etymologically, it's about weight—gravis. If you have a broken leg and you try to walk on it, you are aggravating the injury.
But here’s the kicker: in casual conversation, everyone uses aggravate to mean "to annoy."
"Stop aggravating me!"
Purists hate this. They’ll tell you that people are irritated, while situations are aggravated. Does it matter? Kinda. If you’re writing a formal report or a legal brief, keep them separate. If you’re texting your friend about your annoying neighbor, do whatever feels right.
When Things Get "Compounded"
Sometimes a situation doesn't just get worse; it multiplies. This is where compound comes in.
Imagine a small tech startup. They have a bug in their code. That's a problem. Then, their lead developer quits. Now the problem is compounded. It’s not just that the bug is worse; it’s that the lack of staff makes fixing the bug nearly impossible. Compounding is about layers. It’s the "it never rains but it pours" word.
In finance, we talk about compounding interest, which is great. In life, compounding errors are a nightmare. You see this in disaster management constantly. In the 2005 aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, the initial storm was the disaster, but the failure of the levees and the delayed federal response compounded the tragedy. It wasn't just one thing getting worse; it was multiple failures stacking on top of each other until the system collapsed.
The Medical and Physical: Inflame and Envenom
We often borrow words from biology to describe social messes.
Inflame is a perfect example. It suggests heat. If a political debate is already tense and someone brings up a highly controversial, unrelated scandal, they are inflaming the situation. It’s provocative. It suggests that the "worsening" is accompanied by passion, anger, or literal "heat."
Then there’s envenom. This one is underused. It means to literally put venom into something. You don’t just make a situation worse; you make it poisonous. If a divorce is going poorly and one party starts telling lies to the children, they have envenomed the relationship. It’s a dark, specific way to describe a downward spiral.
Why We Struggle to Find the Right Term
Language is fluid, and honestly, the "correct" word for to make worse depends entirely on the "flavor" of the disaster you're describing.
- Degenerate: Used when a situation is losing its structure or quality. A civil protest might degenerate into a riot.
- Adulterate: This is specifically for making something worse by adding inferior ingredients. You adulterate wine with water or a pure concept with greed.
- Vitiate: This is the "lawyer word." To vitiate is to impair the legal validity of something. If you sign a contract under duress, that duress vitiates the agreement.
Nuance isn't just for poets. If you're a manager and you say a project has "devolved," you’re implying a loss of leadership or order. If you say it has been "hindered," you’re blaming external obstacles. Choosing the right word changes who gets the blame and how the solution is framed.
The "Lower" Vocabulary: Spoil, Mar, and Botch
Not everything needs to sound like it came out of a 19th-century British novel. Sometimes, simple is better.
To mar something is to ruin its beauty or perfection. A scratch mars the surface of a new car. A single typo mars an otherwise perfect essay. It’s about aesthetics and surface-level damage.
Botch is my favorite for human error. It implies clumsiness. You didn't just make it worse; you did it because you were incompetent in that moment. You botched the surgery. You botched the delivery of the punchline. It carries a sense of "oops," but with higher stakes.
And spoil? That’s for expectations. You spoil a surprise. You spoil a child. You spoil the mood. It’s about taking something that was supposed to be good and making it useless or unpleasant.
Social Media and the "Ratio"
In the digital age, we’ve actually invented new ways to describe things getting worse. Think about the term digging a hole. When a celebrity posts something offensive and then tries to explain it but just makes people angrier, they are digging a hole.
Then there’s doubling down. This is a specific type of making things worse where, instead of apologizing for a mistake, the person repeats the mistake with more conviction. In the world of PR, doubling down is often the fastest way to exacerbate a scandal.
📖 Related: The 550 Madison Ave NYC Revival: Why This Pink Granite Giant Is Actually Worth Your Time
We also have ratioing on platforms like X (formerly Twitter). If your reply count significantly outweighs your like count, you’ve made your digital reputation worse in real-time. It’s a quantitative way of seeing a situation go south.
Historical Blunders: A Lesson in Escalation
History is basically a long list of people finding new ways to make things worse.
Take the "Cobra Effect." During British rule in India, the government was worried about the number of venomous cobras in Delhi. Their solution? Offer a bounty for every dead cobra. Seems smart.
What happened? People started breeding cobras to kill them and collect the reward. When the government figured this out and scrapped the program, the breeders set their now-worthless cobras free. The cobra population actually increased. They exacerbated the problem by trying to solve it without thinking through the incentives. This is a classic "unintended consequence" that makes the status quo look like a dream.
How to Choose the Right Word Every Time
If you're stuck, ask yourself these three questions:
- Is it a physical thing or an idea? Use "aggravate" for bodies/injuries and "exacerbate" for problems/feelings.
- Is it getting worse on its own or did someone do it? "Deteriorate" happens on its own (like old buildings). "Vitiate" or "adulterate" usually requires an actor.
- What is the "vibe" of the failure? Is it "inflamed" (angry), "compounded" (layered), or "marred" (ugly)?
Practical Next Steps for Better Writing
Stop using "make it worse" three times in the same paragraph. It’s boring. It kills the momentum of your story or report.
Instead, try this:
- Audit your current work. Search for the phrase "worse" or "bad." Replace at least half of them with more specific verbs like escalate, intensify, or embitter.
- Match the stakes. Don't say a toddler "exacerbated" a mess by spilling juice. Say they "added to it" or "spread it." Keep "exacerbated" for the board meetings and medical journals.
- Check the direction. If something is getting worse because it's slowing down, use stagnate or atrophy. If it's getting worse because it's speeding up, use precipitate or snowball.
Basically, the more specific you are, the more people trust your perspective. If you can name exactly how a situation is falling apart, you’re halfway to figuring out how to put it back together.