History is rarely clean. It’s messy, painful, and filled with people forced into corners where every single option is a tragedy. When you talk about the Holocaust, you hear names like Mengele or Eichmann—monsters whose names are synonymous with the worst of humanity. But there's another name that doesn't get mentioned nearly enough: Gisella Perl. People called her the Angel of Auschwitz. That sounds like a contradiction, doesn’t it? A doctor in a death camp being called an angel?
She was a Jewish gynecologist from Romania. She ended up in a place where life was systematically erased, yet her entire job was to save it. Except "saving life" in a place like Auschwitz didn't look like it does in a modern hospital. It looked like the stuff of nightmares.
🔗 Read more: Dazzle Camouflage: Why Painting Ships Like Zebras Actually Saved Lives
Perl is famous, or perhaps infamous to some who don't know the context, for performing hundreds of abortions in the barracks. To a casual observer today, that sounds horrifying. But in the twisted reality of the 1940s, a pregnant woman in Auschwitz was a dead woman. Gisella Perl knew that if the SS found out a woman was expecting, she was sent straight to the gas chambers or, even worse, to Josef Mengele's "medical" block for experiments that defy description.
Why the Angel of Auschwitz Had to Break Her Vows
Before the war, Perl was a trailblazer. She was the first woman to graduate as a doctor in her town in Transylvania. She had a husband, a son, and a career. Then 1944 happened. The Nazis invaded Hungary and the surrounding regions, and suddenly, the doctor was a prisoner. She was stripped, shaved, and tattooed.
But the Germans realized she was a skilled surgeon.
They put her to work under the "Angel of Death," Josef Mengele. He was obsessed with genetics, twins, and pregnancy. He told her it was her duty to report every pregnant woman to him. He promised they would be sent to a better camp with better food—a "camp for mothers." It was a lie. A total, sickening lie. Perl quickly realized that every woman she reported never came back. They were being murdered.
She faced a choice. Honestly, I can't even imagine being in that position. She could follow her Hippocratic Oath to "do no harm" and let these women go to their deaths, or she could perform abortions in the middle of a filthy, cold barrack with no tools, no anesthesia, and no water.
She chose the latter.
The Gritty Reality of the Barracks
There was no sterile equipment. She used her bare hands. Often, she had to perform these procedures on the top bunks of the barracks while other prisoners slept or looked away in terror. If she was caught, she’d be killed instantly. If the women were caught, they’d be killed.
She didn't just do it for the sake of the procedure. She did it because she believed that by ending a potential life, she was saving a living, breathing woman who might one day walk out of those gates and start again. It was a calculated, agonizing sacrifice. She would whisper to them. She’d tell them that one day they would have children again. She’d tell them they had to survive to tell the world what was happening.
It’s heavy stuff.
The Post-War Trial of Public Opinion
When the war ended, Perl found out her husband and son had been murdered. She was the only survivor of her family. She moved to New York and tried to get her medical license. But then, the rumors started. People found out what she had done in the camp.
She was accused of being a collaborator.
👉 See also: What Time of Debate Tonight: Why Your Schedule Might Be Empty (and What to Watch Instead)
Think about that for a second. After surviving the camps and risking her life to keep women out of the gas chambers, she was being grilled by immigration officials and other doctors about her morality. They couldn't wrap their heads around the "grey zone" of the Holocaust. They wanted her to be a saint or a sinner, but she was just a human trying to navigate hell.
It took the testimony of dozens of women—women who survived only because of her—to clear her name. They came forward and told the authorities, "Gisella Perl saved me." They explained that without her "crimes," they would have been smoke in the chimneys of Birkenau.
A Legacy of Complicated Ethics
Eventually, she was granted citizenship. Eleanor Roosevelt herself took an interest in her case. Perl went on to work at Mt. Sinai Hospital, and eventually, she opened her own practice. She specialized in infertility. There’s a beautiful, poetic irony in that—the woman who had to end so many pregnancies spent the rest of her life helping women bring life into the world.
She wrote a memoir called I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz. If you haven't read it, you should. It’s brutal, but it’s necessary. She describes how she felt every time she had to perform a procedure. She didn't feel like a hero. She felt like a murderer. She carried that guilt until the day she died in 1988.
She would start every delivery she performed in New York with a prayer: "God, you owe me a life—a living baby."
What Most People Get Wrong About This Story
Some people try to use the Angel of Auschwitz as a political talking point for modern debates. That’s a mistake. You can’t apply 2026 logic to 1944 Auschwitz. Her actions weren't about "choice" in the way we talk about it today. They were about life versus certain, agonizing death.
There's a specific detail many people miss. Perl wasn't just doing abortions. She was also "delivering" babies in secret. If a woman was too far along, Perl would help her give birth, and then—and this is the hardest part to read—she would have to end the infant's life immediately so the mother wouldn't be discovered. She would tell the mother the baby was stillborn. It was a mercy that felt like a sin.
It’s important to understand the nuance here. Perl wasn't a "collaborator" because she worked with Mengele. She was a saboteur. She used her position to hide people, to heal people, and to keep the flicker of hope alive in a place designed to extinguish it.
The Medical Ethics We Still Discuss
Doctors today still study her case. Why? Because it represents the absolute limit of medical ethics. When the "correct" medical path leads to a patient's execution, the "correct" path is no longer moral.
- The Principle of Totality: Saving the whole (the mother) by sacrificing the part (the pregnancy).
- The Moral Grey Zone: A term coined by Primo Levi to describe the complex survival tactics in the camps.
- Resilience: Perl’s ability to continue practicing medicine after such trauma is a case study in human psychology.
She didn't just survive; she thrived. She delivered thousands of babies in the United States. Thousands. Every one of those children is a testament to her decision to survive.
Actionable Insights from the Story of Gisella Perl
Understanding history isn't just about memorizing dates. It's about empathy and perspective. If you're looking to dive deeper into this or apply the lessons of her life, here’s how to approach it:
Read Primary Sources First: Don't just rely on articles. Get a copy of I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz. It provides a first-hand account of the decisions made in the barracks that no secondary source can capture. It's available in most libraries or as an e-book.
📖 Related: NBC Richard Engel: Why the Chief Foreign Correspondent Still Matters
Visit the Holocaust Museums Digitally: If you can't get to D.C. or Jerusalem, the Yad Vashem and USHMM websites have extensive digital archives on Jewish doctors in the camps. Look for the "Medicine and the Holocaust" sections.
Check the Evidence: When you see "The Angel of Auschwitz" referenced online, verify the claims. There is a 2003 film called Out of the Ashes based on her life. It's a good starting point, but remember it's a dramatization. Compare it to her actual testimony at the Bergen-Belsen trials.
Support Medical Ethics Education: Many medical schools now have mandatory courses on the history of medicine during the Holocaust to ensure that the "grey zones" Perl navigated are understood by future doctors. Look into organizations like the Maimonides Institute for Medicine, Ethics, and the Holocaust if you're interested in how this history shapes modern patient care.
Gisella Perl’s life was defined by a paradox. She was a healer who had to kill to save. She was a prisoner who held the power of life and death. Her story reminds us that even in the darkest pits of human history, the individual conscience still has the power to act, even when every choice is a terrible one. She wasn't an angel because she was perfect; she was an angel because she was willing to get her hands dirty to save a single soul.