Charlie Kirk. You know the name. You’ve seen the face on a dozen viral clips, usually sitting behind a table with a sign that says "Prove Me Wrong." He’s a guy who built a massive media empire out of being the loudest, most confident voice in the room. But behind the polished podcast sets and the "free speech" branding, there’s a long, documented trail of rhetoric that has left people reeling. Honestly, it’s a lot to sort through.
When we talk about hateful things Charlie Kirk has said, it's not just about a few "hot takes." It’s a consistent, years-long pattern of targeting specific groups of people. He doesn't just disagree with policies; he often questions the very competency and humanity of the people he’s talking about. If you’ve been following the news lately, specifically since the shocking reports of his death in late 2025, the conversation around his legacy has become even more heated.
The Attack on the Civil Rights Legacy
One of the biggest shifts in Kirk’s rhetoric came when he decided to take on a literal American icon. For years, conservatives generally tried to claim Martin Luther King Jr. as one of their own. Kirk flipped the script. He started calling MLK "awful" and "not a good person."
Basically, he argued that King’s activism paved the way for what he calls "permanent DEI-type bureaucracy." At a Turning Point USA event in December 2023, he told a crowd that passing the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was a "huge mistake." Imagine that. Arguing against the law that ended Jim Crow and legal segregation. He didn’t stop there. He leaned into the idea that the Civil Rights Act somehow created a "two-tier" justice system that discriminates against white people.
Race, Pilots, and "Prowling" Tropes
If you listen to The Charlie Kirk Show, you’ve heard him talk about "meritocracy." But often, that conversation turns into something much darker. In early 2024, Kirk made headlines for saying that if he saw a Black pilot, he would instinctively wonder if they were "qualified."
"If I see a Black pilot, I'm going to be like, boy, I hope he's qualified." – The Charlie Kirk Show, January 23, 2024.
It’s a classic trope. It suggests that any Black person in a high-skill position only got there because of a "quota." He’s applied this same logic to Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson and even Michelle Obama. He’s gone so far as to call Black women in customer service "moronic" and wondered aloud if they were "affirmative action picks."
Then there’s the "prowling" comment. In May 2023, he claimed it was a "fact" that "prowling Blacks" go around urban America targeting white people for fun. This isn't just political commentary; it's the kind of language that sounds like it was pulled straight from a 1920s race-baiting pamphlet.
The "Great Replacement" and Immigration
Kirk has been one of the loudest mainstream voices pushing the "Great Replacement" theory. For those who aren't familiar, this is the debunked conspiracy theory that "elites" are intentionally bringing in non-white immigrants to "replace" white voters.
He’s said the Democrat party "loves it when America becomes less white." On his show in March 2024, he explicitly framed the situation at the southern border as a strategy to "replace white rural America." This kind of rhetoric is widely condemned by civil rights groups like the ADL and the SPLC because it has been linked to real-world violence.
He’s also taken aim at Islam. He’s called it "the sword the left is using to slit the throat of America." Honestly, the level of vitriol here is hard to overstate. He’s argued that large Islamic areas are a "threat" and that the religion itself is "incompatible with Western civilization."
Women, Birth Control, and "Submission"
Kirk’s views on women are, well, vintage. He’s been a vocal critic of birth control, claiming it makes young women "angry and bitter." He doesn't just stop at policy; he gets personal.
When Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce's relationship dominated the news, Kirk had some choice words. He told Swift to "reject feminism" and "submit" to her husband. He even said she should change her name to "Taylor Kelce" because if she didn't, she wouldn't "really mean it."
And then there’s the abortion debate. In a viral exchange from late 2024, Kirk was asked if he would support an abortion for his own hypothetical 10-year-old daughter if she were raped. His answer? "The baby would be delivered." He argued that having an abortion in that situation would be "pandering to evil."
Why This Matters Now
Looking back at the hateful things Charlie Kirk has said, it's clear he wasn't just looking for clicks. He was building a movement. He focused on "alienated young dudes" (as some critics have pointed out) and gave them a framework where empathy is seen as a weakness.
In fact, he’s explicitly said, "I can't stand the word empathy." He thinks it’s a "new age term" that does "a lot of damage." When you remove empathy from the equation, it becomes a lot easier to say things like "gun deaths are a prudent deal" to protect the Second Amendment—another one of his more infamous quotes from 2023.
Navigating the Legacy
So, what do we do with all this? It’s important to look at the facts. Kirk was a master of the "Gish Gallop"—throwing out so many controversial points at once that it’s impossible to debunk them all in real-time. But when you slow down and look at the transcripts, a very specific worldview emerges.
💡 You might also like: White on White Crime: What Most People Get Wrong About Proximity and Statistics
What you can do next:
If you want to understand the impact of this rhetoric, start by looking at how these "Great Replacement" and "anti-DEI" narratives are actually affecting policy in states like Florida or Texas. You can also research the "Professor Watchlist," a project Kirk's organization started, which critics say has led to the harassment of academics across the country. Understanding the source of the soundbites is the first step in deconstructing the narrative.