You probably think the history of the US police started with some guy in a blue suit and a badge walking a beat in a black-and-white movie version of old New York. It’s a clean image. It’s also mostly wrong.
The reality is messier. It’s weirder. It’s a patchwork of private night watches, profit-driven "thief-takers," and, in the South, something much darker. There was never a single "Aha!" moment where the United States decided to have a national police force. Instead, we kind of stumbled into it because cities were getting too big, too crowded, and too rowdy for the old ways to work anymore.
The chaos before the badge
Before there were cops, there was the "Night Watch." Think of a group of volunteers—or sometimes guys doing it to avoid jail time—walking around with lanterns. They weren't exactly elite. Honestly, most of them spent their shifts sleeping or drinking. If you got robbed in 1790, you didn't call 911. You ran outside and screamed "Murder!" or "Thief!" and hoped your neighbors felt like helping. This was the "hue and cry" system, an old English tradition that we dragged across the Atlantic.
It was reactive. Not proactive.
In the Northern colonies, people relied on constables and sheriffs. These weren't salaried positions like we have now. They were paid through fees. You wanted an arrest made? You paid for it. This created a system where the rich got "justice" and everyone else just got lucky—or didn't.
The Southern origin story
While the North was messing around with lazy night watchers, the South was developing something entirely different: slave patrols. This is a heavy part of the history of the US police that historians like Sally Hadden have documented extensively. The first formal slave patrol was created in the Carolina colonies around 1704.
Their job wasn't "public safety" in a general sense. Their job was specifically to control the movements of enslaved people, break up gatherings, and prevent uprisings. They had the legal authority to enter private homes. They could demand "passes" from anyone they met. When people talk about the "DNA" of American policing, this is the strand that often gets overlooked, but it’s right there in the ledger books.
Why 1838 changed everything
Boston was the first to blink. By 1838, the city was a powder keg of shipping wealth, massive immigration, and "mob violence." The old system of part-time watchmen couldn't handle it. The merchant class was terrified their warehouses would get burned down in the next riot.
So, they created the first publicly funded, full-time police force.
New York followed in 1845. They modeled their "Copper" system (where we likely get the word "cop," referring to the copper badges) after Sir Robert Peel’s London Metropolitan Police. Peel’s "Peelian Principles" suggested that the police are the public and the public are the police. It sounds nice on paper. But in America, it took a very different turn.
Early American police were hyper-local. They didn't wear uniforms at first because they thought it looked too much like a standing army, which Americans hated. Also, they were deeply political. In cities like Chicago and New York, the police were basically the muscle for the local political machine. If you wanted to be a cop, you didn't take a fitness test; you knew a guy who knew a guy at Tammany Hall.
The "Political Era" was a mess
Imagine a cop who doesn't answer to a chief, but to a local ward boss. That was the 19th-century reality.
Corruption wasn't a bug; it was the feature. Officers would ignore illegal gambling or saloons if the owners paid their "taxes" to the political party in power. Brutality was common because there was zero oversight. If a cop hit someone with a wooden club (the "espantoon"), there was no internal affairs department to complain to.
- 1894 Lexow Committee: This was a massive investigation into the NYPD. It found that the police were literally selling promotions. You wanted to be a captain? That’ll be $10,000.
- The Third Degree: This was the "standard" interrogation method. It meant beating a confession out of a suspect. It was so common that it wasn't even hidden; it was just how business was done.
August Vollmer and the "Professional" dream
Eventually, people got fed up. Enter August Vollmer, the chief of police in Berkeley, California, in the early 1900s. He’s often called the "father of modern policing." Vollmer wanted to turn cops into professionals—basically scientists in uniform.
He pushed for:
- Radios in cars.
- Fingerprinting and records.
- Lie detectors (which he helped develop).
- College degrees for officers.
Vollmer’s vision was about taking the "politics" out of it. He wanted a military-style hierarchy. This shifted the history of the US police into the "Professional Era." On one hand, it reduced the blatant bribery of the political machines. On the other hand, it created a "thin blue line" mentality. Cops started seeing themselves as a separate class from the citizens they served. They retreated into patrol cars instead of walking the streets.
They became "crime fighters" rather than community members.
The 1960s breaking point
By the time the 1960s rolled around, the tension between this professional, motorized force and the people they policed—especially in Black communities—boiled over. You had the Civil Rights movement, the anti-war protests, and a series of massive riots in places like Watts, Detroit, and Newark.
The Kerner Commission in 1968 actually told the truth about it. It stated that "abrasive relationship[s] between the police and minority communities" were a primary cause of the unrest. The response, however, wasn't necessarily to "de-escalate." Instead, the government poured money into "Law and Order."
💡 You might also like: Which Presidents Have Been Assassinated: The Brutal Reality of American History
Militarization and the War on Drugs
In 1965, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Law Enforcement Assistance Act. This started the flow of federal money and military-grade equipment to local police departments.
Then came the 1970s and 80s. The "War on Drugs" changed the stakes. Suddenly, police departments were being judged by "stats"—how many arrests? How many kilos seized? This led to the rise of SWAT teams (Special Weapons and Tactics). Originally meant for very specific, high-risk hostage situations, SWAT teams began being used for routine drug warrants.
By the 1990s, "Broken Windows" theory took over. The idea, popularized by George Kelling and James Q. Wilson, was that if you crack down on small things—vandalism, public drinking, loitering—you prevent big crimes. This birthed "Stop and Frisk" in New York. While it was credited by some for dropping crime rates, it also resulted in millions of people, mostly young men of color, being detained without much cause.
The tech explosion
Today, the history of the US police is being written in code. We have moved from the "hue and cry" to predictive policing algorithms. We have body cameras, which were supposed to be the "ultimate transparency tool," but the reality has been more complicated. Sometimes they’re off. Sometimes the footage isn't released.
We also have "Qualified Immunity." This is a legal doctrine created by the Supreme Court in 1967 (Pierson v. Ray) and expanded in the 80s. It basically makes it incredibly hard to sue a police officer for violating your rights unless there is a "clearly established" prior court case with almost identical facts. It’s one of the biggest points of contention in modern legal debates.
What we get wrong about the "Good Old Days"
People often pine for a time when things were "simpler." But if you look at the timeline, there was never really a Golden Age of American policing.
- In the 1800s, it was corrupt and political.
- In the early 1900s, it was brutal and unscientific.
- In the mid-century, it was often a tool for enforcing segregation.
The struggle has always been the same: how do you give a group of people the power of life and death (the "monopoly on violence") and still keep them accountable to the people? We are still trying to figure that out.
Actionable insights for understanding the system
If you want to actually engage with this history or the current state of policing, you have to look past the headlines.
1. Check your local police budget
Most people have no idea how much of their city's general fund goes to the police. It’s usually the largest single line item. Websites like "Open the Books" or your city's official transparency portal can show you where that money goes—is it salaries? Is it equipment? Is it settlements for misconduct lawsuits?
2. Learn about the POST commission
Every state has a Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) commission. They are the ones who decide what training cops get and who gets to keep their license. If you want to see change, this is where the "rules of the game" are written.
3. Read the primary sources
Don't just take a pundit's word for it. Read the 1968 Kerner Commission report. Read the 2015 Task Force on 21st Century Policing report. You'll be surprised how many of the "new" problems we’re discussing were actually identified decades ago.
4. Understand the "1033 Program"
This is the federal program that allows the Pentagon to transfer surplus military equipment to local police. You can actually look up what your specific local department has received—whether it’s bayonets, night-vision goggles, or armored vehicles (MRAPs).
📖 Related: How Are The Polls Looking Today: What Most People Get Wrong About the 2026 Midterms
The history of the US police isn't a straight line of progress. It’s a series of reactions to social anxiety, racial tension, and the ever-changing definition of "order." Understanding that it was built piece-by-piece by humans—often for specific, flawed reasons—is the first step in deciding what it should look like tomorrow.