You check your phone 150 times a day. Maybe more. You aren't doing it because you have a specific task to finish, usually. You do it because you’re bored, lonely, or slightly anxious. This isn't an accident. It's a design choice. Nir Eyal spent years studying the intersection of psychology, technology, and business to figure out exactly how companies like Facebook, Pinterest, and Instagram create what he calls "habit-forming products." His book, Hooked, basically became the silicon valley playbook for keeping you glued to your screen.
If you've ever felt that phantom vibration in your pocket—that's the Hook Model at work.
Building a habit isn't about luck. It’s about a specific four-step loop. Eyal argues that for a product to succeed in the long run, it has to move from external triggers to internal ones. It's the difference between an app sending you a push notification and you opening that app automatically because you felt a pang of FOMO. Most founders think they need more features. Honestly? They usually just need a better hook.
The Hooked Book Nir Eyal Wrote Changed Everything
Before Hooked, most people in tech talked about "user experience" in very clinical terms. Eyal shifted the conversation toward behavioral design. He defines a habit as a behavior done with little or no conscious thought. That is the holy grail for a business. If a customer doesn't have to think about using your service, you’ve won. You don't have to spend money on ads to get them back. They just... show up.
The model is deceptively simple: Trigger, Action, Variable Reward, and Investment.
It All Starts With a Trigger
Triggers are the spark plugs. You’ve got external triggers, which are the things we all know—emails, icons, notifications, or a friend telling you "hey, you gotta see this." But those are just the training wheels. The goal of any habit-forming product is to attach itself to an internal trigger.
Internal triggers are emotions.
When you’re feeling lonely, you check Facebook. When you’re feeling unsure, you check Google. When you’re bored, you check YouTube or Reddit. The product becomes the "solution" to a negative emotion. Eyal points out that we don't use these apps because they are "fun" in the traditional sense; we use them to alleviate discomfort. It’s a subtle but massive distinction. If your product doesn't solve a recurring itch, it’s never going to become a habit.
The Action: Keep it Stupidly Simple
The Action phase is the actual behavior. Clicking a link. Scrolling a feed. Watching a video.
Eyal leans heavily on B.J. Fogg’s Behavior Model here. For an action to happen, a person needs three things: Motivation, Ability, and a Trigger. If you want someone to do something, you can try to increase their motivation, but that’s hard. It’s much easier to increase their ability by making the task easier.
Think about the "Infinite Scroll." It’s the perfect example of increasing ability. You don't even have to click "next page" anymore. The content just keeps coming. You don't have to make a choice, so you just keep scrolling. The less friction there is, the more likely the habit will take hold.
The Secret Sauce: Variable Rewards
This is the part of Hooked that gets the most attention, and for good reason. It’s the engine of the whole thing.
If you go to your fridge and the light comes on every time, you stop thinking about it. It’s predictable. But if you went to your fridge and sometimes there was a piece of cake, sometimes a head of lettuce, and sometimes a $20 bill, you’d be checking that fridge every ten minutes.
That’s a variable reward.
Nir Eyal breaks these down into three types:
- The Tribe: Social rewards. Likes, comments, upvotes. We are social animals, and we crave validation from our peers.
- The Hunt: The search for resources. This is the scrolling. You’re looking for that one interesting tweet or that one funny video among a sea of garbage.
- The Self: Internal rewards of mastery or completion. Checking off a to-do list, clearing your inbox, or leveling up in a game.
The unpredictability is what creates the dopamine hit. If you knew exactly what was on your Instagram feed before you opened it, you wouldn't open it nearly as often. It’s the "maybe" that keeps us coming back. It's slot machine logic applied to software.
Why Your Data Is the Ultimate Investment
The final step is the Investment. This is where the user does a little bit of work.
✨ Don't miss: Why IT Outsourcing Advantages Actually Matter More in 2026
Usually, we think that labor leads to a reward. In the Hook Model, the investment comes after the reward. You’ve seen the funny video (Reward), so now you leave a comment or follow the creator (Investment).
Every time you add data, follow someone, or learn a new feature, you are increasing the "stored value" of the product. It makes the app better the next time you use it. It also creates "bittersweet" switching costs. If you have ten years of photos on Google Photos, you aren't going to switch to a different service easily, even if the other service is technically better. You’ve invested too much. You're locked in.
Is This Even Ethical?
Let’s be real. Reading Hooked can feel a bit like reading a manual on how to build a digital drug. Eyal doesn't shy away from this. He actually spends a significant portion of the book discussing the ethics of manipulation.
He introduces the "Manipulation Matrix."
It’s a simple two-by-two grid to help creators decide if they should be building a specific habit. You have to ask two questions:
- Does the product materially improve the user's life?
- Does the creator use the product themselves?
If you're building something that helps people and you use it too, you're a "Facilitator." That’s the goal. If you’re building something you don’t use and it doesn’t help people, you’re a "Dealer." Eyal is pretty blunt about the fact that being a dealer is a bad long-term business strategy, not to mention a moral failure.
However, critics often argue that even "Facilitators" can end up creating addictive loops that harm mental health. It’s a gray area. Technology is neutral, but the way we design it is not. Nir Eyal eventually wrote a follow-up book called Indistractable because he realized people needed help breaking the very habits he taught companies how to build. That’s a bit ironic, isn't it? But it shows the power of these psychological loops.
What Most People Get Wrong About Habits
A lot of entrepreneurs read Hooked and think they just need to add a "points" system or a leaderboard to their app. That’s gamification, and it’s usually shallow.
💡 You might also like: Social Security Benefits Change: Why Your 2026 Checks Look Different
A real habit isn't about points. It’s about the relief of a psychological itch.
If your app doesn't connect to a real-world problem or a real-world emotion, no amount of "variable rewards" will save it. You can't just sprinkle dopamine on a boring product and expect it to stick. The habit has to be baked into the core value proposition.
Also, habits aren't permanent. They can be broken or replaced. If a product becomes too noisy, too cluttered, or starts feeling like a chore rather than a relief, users will eventually churn. The investment phase is supposed to make the product better, but if it makes the product feel like "work," the hook snaps.
Actionable Steps for Product Builders and Users
If you are trying to apply these principles—or maybe defend yourself against them—here is how you actually use this information.
For Builders:
- Identify the internal trigger: What is the specific moment of "pain" or "itch" your user feels right before they use your product? Be specific. Is it "I'm bored at the DMV" or "I'm worried my boss is mad at me"?
- Audit your Action: Count the number of clicks it takes to get to the "reward." Cut them in half. Then try to cut them in half again.
- Vary the payoff: If your app provides the exact same experience every time, it will fail. Add a layer of discovery.
- Ask for a small investment: Don't ask users to set up a full profile on day one. Ask them to do one small thing—like a single "save"—that makes their next visit better.
For Users (The "De-Hooking" Strategy):
📖 Related: Malaysian Riyal to INR Explained: Why Everyone Gets the Name Wrong
- Make triggers invisible: Turn off all non-human notifications. If an app isn't a person trying to reach you, it shouldn't be allowed to buzz in your pocket.
- Increase the friction of the Action: Move your most addictive apps off your home screen and into a folder. Better yet, delete the app and only use the browser version. Making the action harder kills the habit.
- Acknowledge the itch: When you reach for your phone, stop for three seconds. Ask yourself: "What emotion am I feeling right now?" Simply naming the trigger (boredom, loneliness, stress) can often break the loop.
The brilliance of Nir Eyal’s work isn't that he discovered these psychological quirks—psychologists have known about operant conditioning for decades. His brilliance was in codifying it for the digital age. Whether you're building the next big thing or just trying to get your focus back, understanding the hook is no longer optional. It's the literal architecture of our modern world.