Strategy is a word that gets tossed around boardrooms until it basically loses all meaning. Most people think it’s just a fancy way of saying "how we'll sell more stuff." It isn't. Not really. When you look at strategic positioning attempts to achieve sustainable competitive advantage, you're looking at the soul of a company. It’s the difference between being a one-hit-wonder and being a titan that lasts forty years.
You've probably heard of Michael Porter. He's the Harvard professor who essentially wrote the Bible on this stuff back in the 80s. Porter argued that you can't be everything to everyone. If you try, you end up stuck in the middle. You’re not the cheapest. You’re not the best. You’re just... there. And being "just there" is a death sentence in a world where everyone is fighting for a sliver of market share.
The Trade-Off Problem
Here is the thing. Strategy isn't just about what you do. It’s mostly about what you don’t do.
Strategic positioning is fundamentally about choice. Look at Southwest Airlines back in the day. They didn't offer meals. They didn't have assigned seating. They didn't fly into massive, expensive hub airports. To a traditional airline executive in the 90s, that looked like a list of failures. But it wasn't. It was a calculated series of trade-offs. By stripping away the fluff, they achieved a cost structure that nobody else could touch. That is a perfect example of how strategic positioning attempts to achieve sustainable competitive advantage by being different, not just "better."
If you just try to be "better" than your rival, you're playing a game of operational effectiveness. You’re running the same race, just trying to run a little faster. But if you're both running the same race, the only way to win is to work harder for less profit. Eventually, the margins go to zero.
Finding Your Unique Value Proposition
A sustainable advantage isn't a single thing. It’s a system.
Think about IKEA. You can't just copy one part of IKEA and expect to win. If you copy their flat-pack furniture but keep a traditional sales staff, your costs go up. If you copy their warehouse layout but don't have the massive scale to buy wood at their prices, you're priced out. Everything they do—from the Swedish meatballs that keep you in the store to the weirdly specific way they design their catalogs—works together.
This is what experts call "fit." When your activities reinforce each other, it becomes incredibly hard for a competitor to mimic you. They’d have to change their entire company to compete. Most companies are too lazy or too scared to do that.
Why Most Positioning Fails
Most companies fail because they're terrified of saying no to a customer. They see a segment of the market they aren't reaching and they think, "We should go after that!"
📖 Related: Amazon Settles Lawsuit Over Mercury in Skin-Lightening Creams for $6m: What Really Happened
Bad move.
When you try to straddle two different positions, you usually break both. Take a luxury brand that decides to launch a budget line. Suddenly, the luxury buyers feel the brand is cheapened, and the budget buyers still think it’s too expensive. You lose the sustainable edge because your "system" is now fighting itself.
Honestly, it's kinda painful to watch. You see it in tech all the time. A company builds a great, simple tool. It gets popular. Then, the "feature creep" sets in. They add 500 buttons because a few corporate clients asked for them. Suddenly, the simple tool is a bloated mess, and a new startup comes along to eat their lunch with—you guessed it—a simple tool.
The Role of Resources and Capabilities
We can't talk about strategic positioning attempts to achieve sustainable competitive advantage without mentioning the Resource-Based View (RBV). Jay Barney, another heavy hitter in the strategy world, talked about the VRIO framework. For a resource to give you a real edge, it has to be:
- Valuable: It actually helps you exploit an opportunity.
- Rare: Not everyone has it.
- Inimitable: It's really hard or expensive to copy.
- Organized: Your company is actually set up to use it.
If you have a "secret sauce" but your kitchen is a mess, the sauce doesn't matter. If you have a great patent but no money to defend it in court, it’s not a sustainable advantage. It’s just a piece of paper.
Real-World Examples of Positioning That Stuck
Look at Patagonia. Their position is built on environmental radicalism. They literally ran an ad saying "Don't Buy This Jacket."
Think about that for a second.
A clothing company telling you not to buy their clothes. It sounds like madness. But for their core customer, it’s a massive signal of authenticity. A competitor like Gap or H&M can't just copy that. If they tried, nobody would believe them. Patagonia’s advantage is sustainable because it’s baked into their brand identity and their supply chain. They’ve spent decades building a "moat" made of trust and specific sourcing practices.
Then you have companies like Costco.
Costco is a masterclass in strategic positioning. They have a limited number of items (SKUs). While a typical grocery store might have 30,000 items, Costco has around 4,000. This gives them insane bargaining power with suppliers. They don't make their money on the markup of the hot dogs; they make it on the membership fees. The membership creates "stickiness." Once you've paid the $60 or $120 for the year, you feel like you have to shop there to get your money's worth. That is a structural advantage that is very hard to break.
✨ Don't miss: Photos of Stock Market Crash Moments That Actually Changed How We Invest
The Digital Shift: Does Positioning Still Matter?
Some people argue that in the age of AI and instant data, strategic positioning is dead. They say things move too fast for a "sustainable" advantage.
They’re wrong.
If anything, positioning matters more now because the "noise" is louder. If you don't stand for something specific, you're just a commodity. And the thing about commodities is that someone can always make them cheaper in another country or with a better algorithm.
The digital "moats" of today are often built on network effects. Think of eBay or Airbnb. The value isn't just the software; it's the fact that everyone else is already there. If you want to sell your vintage Pokémon cards, you go to eBay because that's where the buyers are. If you’re a buyer, you go there because that’s where the sellers are.
This is a form of strategic positioning attempts to achieve sustainable competitive advantage that relies on scale and ecosystem rather than just product features. It’s incredibly hard to displace a leader in a network-effect market.
Common Misconceptions to Avoid
People often confuse "strategy" with "vision."
A vision is "We want to be the best car company in the world."
A strategy is "We will produce only electric vehicles for the high-end luxury market using a direct-to-consumer sales model to bypass dealership costs."
See the difference? One is a wish; the other is a plan based on specific choices and trade-offs.
Another mistake is thinking that a competitive advantage lasts forever. It doesn't. Even the best moats can be breached. Kodak had an incredible position in film. Then film disappeared. Blockbuster had the best real estate for movie rentals. Then the internet happened. Sustainable doesn't mean "eternal." It means it lasts long enough to generate superior returns over a significant period. You still have to keep an eye on the horizon.
How to Audit Your Own Position
If you're looking at your own business or a company you're investing in, ask these questions. Be brutally honest.
- Who are we not serving? If the answer is "no one," you don't have a strategy.
- What would we have to stop doing to be more like our biggest competitor? If it’s easy to switch, you don't have a unique position.
- Do our different activities actually help each other? Or are they just a random collection of services?
- Is our advantage based on something we own (a patent, a brand, a location) or just on us working harder? Working harder is a great way to burn out, but it's rarely a sustainable competitive advantage.
Basically, you want to find the "unfair" part of your business. What do you have that others can't just buy?
Actionable Next Steps
To actually implement this, stop looking at your competitors' feature lists. Stop trying to match them button-for-button or service-for-service.
Instead, map out your Activity System. Draw a circle in the middle of a piece of paper with your core value proposition (e.g., "Fastest delivery in the tri-state area"). Then, draw circles around it for all the specific things you do to make that happen (e.g., "Local warehouses," "Proprietary routing software," "In-house delivery drivers").
👉 See also: A cuanto esta el dolar en pesos mexicanos: Why the Exchange Rate is Acting So Weird Right Now
Draw lines between the circles where they support each other. If you have a bunch of circles with no lines, those are distractions. If you have a dense web of interconnected activities, you have the beginnings of a sustainable position.
Focus your investment on the "links" between those activities. That’s where the real magic happens. It’s much easier to copy a single activity than it is to copy a whole web of them.
Next, look at your customer feedback—not the people who love you, but the people who almost bought from you but didn't. Why did they go elsewhere? If they went elsewhere because you were "too expensive" or "didn't have enough features," that’s actually a good sign. It means your trade-offs are working. It means you’ve actually taken a stand.
If everyone likes you but no one loves you, you’re in the "stuck in the middle" zone. Get out of there as fast as you can. Pick a side. Make a choice. Stick to it until the market proves you wrong. That is how you win.