You’ve probably heard it a thousand times in tech circles or during some late-night debate about piracy. Information wants to be free. It’s the ultimate battle cry for the digital age, used by everyone from Julian Assange to the person downloading a torrent of a movie they didn’t want to pay for. But here’s the thing: most people use it as a permission slip. They treat it like a law of nature that justifies taking whatever they want, whenever they want.
It isn't that simple. Not even close.
The original quote didn't come from a manifesto written by a hacker in a basement. It came from Stewart Brand, the legendary founder of the Whole Earth Catalog, during the first Hackers Conference in 1984. He was actually talking to Steve Wozniak. Brand wasn't just making a point about liberation; he was describing a fundamental tension—a paradox—that we still haven't solved forty years later.
Information is weird.
The Paradox Stewart Brand Actually Described
When Brand dropped the line about information wants to be free, he followed it up with something most people conveniently forget. He said that information also wants to be expensive.
Why? Because it’s so incredibly valuable. The right piece of information at the right time can change your life, start a company, or stop a war. That makes it worth a fortune. Yet, at the same time, the cost of copying that information is getting closer to zero every single day.
Think about it. In the 1400s, if you wanted a copy of a book, a monk had to spend months hunched over a desk with a quill. Information was physically heavy. It was expensive because the labor was immense. Today? You can copy a trillion-dollar piece of software or a 4K movie with a right-click. The "wanting to be free" part refers to this technological pressure. Digital bits don't like being locked up. They leak. They replicate. They migrate across borders through fiber optic cables while we're sleeping.
💡 You might also like: Finding the Best Website to Test Internet Speed Without the Marketing Fluff
Brand’s point was that these two forces—the immense value of information and the zero cost of distributing it—are in a constant, violent struggle.
We’re living in that struggle right now.
Why The Internet Makes This Messy
The internet is basically a giant copying machine. That’s its job. When you "send" an email, you aren't actually sending it; you're making a copy of a file on your computer and placing it on another server.
This inherent nature of the web is why information wants to be free became such a powerful meme. It felt like the technology itself had a political agenda. In the early days of the web, there was this utopian idea that if we just let information flow, everyone would be smarter, dictators would fall, and the world would be one big happy library.
It didn't quite work out that way.
The Problem With "Free"
When information is "free" as in "zero dollars," someone still has to pay for the lights. This led to the rise of the attention economy. If you aren't paying for the product, you are the product. Your data, your habits, your literal eyeballs on a screen—that’s the currency.
We traded the cost of information for the cost of our privacy.
This is where the concept gets dark. If information wants to be free, that includes your medical records. It includes your private texts. It includes the location data your phone collects. When we shout that information should be liberated, we rarely consider that "information" isn't just books and music. It’s the digital trail of our entire lives.
The Copyright Battle and The Napster Ghost
We can't talk about information wants to be free without mentioning the music industry. Remember Napster? In 1999, Shawn Fanning and Sean Parker basically hit the "free" button on the entire history of recorded music.
The industry freaked out.
🔗 Read more: Fisheye Lens DSLR Photo: Why That Ultra-Wide Distortion Is Making a Comeback
They tried to sue everyone. They tried to put digital locks (DRM) on everything. It failed. It failed because you can't fight the physics of the medium. If a file can be copied, it will be. Eventually, the industry had to pivot to streaming.
Spotify is the compromise. It’s not "free," but it’s "free enough" that the friction of pirating music became more annoying than just paying ten bucks a month. The information got its wish—it's flowing everywhere—but the artists are often the ones getting squeezed in the process.
The Open Source Movement
On the flip side, the "free" movement gave us Linux, Wikipedia, and the very foundation of the modern web. This isn't just about price; it's about "libre" (liberty) vs "gratis" (zero cost).
Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation, famously said we should think of "free speech," not "free beer."
When software is free, you have the right to look at the code, change it, and share it. This transparency is what keeps the internet running. Your smartphone, your bank's servers, and probably your smart fridge are all running on open-source code that someone decided should be "free."
Generative AI: The New Frontier of Free Information
Now, we’re hitting a massive new wall: Artificial Intelligence.
Large Language Models (LLMs) like the ones built by OpenAI or Google were trained on... well, everything. They ingested the "free" information of the internet. Millions of blog posts, news articles, and copyrighted books.
The creators of this content are now saying, "Wait a minute. Information wants to be free, but I still need to eat."
The New York Times lawsuit against OpenAI is the perfect modern example of Stewart Brand's paradox. The Times spends millions of dollars sending reporters to war zones to gather information (information is expensive). The AI then scrapes that information and gives it away to a user for "free" (information wants to be free).
Who wins?
If the producers of information can't get paid, they stop producing it. If they stop producing it, the AI has nothing new to learn. The system eats itself. This is the "expensive" side of the paradox fighting back against the "free" side.
The Myth of Neutrality
People often treat the idea that "information wants to be free" as a moral truth. It's not. It's an observation of how digital systems work.
Bits don't have ethics.
When a whistleblower leaks documents about government corruption, we say information should be free. When a hacker leaks the credit card numbers of 50 million people, we definitely don't say that.
The struggle is that technology doesn't distinguish between the two. The same tools that allow a dissident to bypass a firewall in a repressive regime are the same tools that allow misinformation to spread like wildfire on social media. Information flows where there is the least resistance.
Misconceptions You Should Probably Drop
- Misconception 1: Stewart Brand was an anarchist. Brand was actually a pragmatist. He was pointing out a business problem for the digital age, not calling for the end of copyright law.
- Misconception 2: Free information means everything should be $0. It’s about access and flow. Sometimes, charging for information is the only way to ensure its quality and independence.
- Misconception 3: You can stop information from leaking. You can't. Not forever. History shows that once information is digital, the "wanting to be free" side eventually wins. The trick is building a society that can handle that reality.
Real-World Evidence of the Shift
Look at the "Right to Repair" movement. This is a battle over information. Companies like John Deere or Apple used to keep their repair manuals and software codes locked up. They argued it was their intellectual property.
But farmers and consumers argued that the information wants to be free—or at least, the information needed to fix the things they already own should be accessible. In 2024 and 2025, we've seen a massive wave of legislation forcing these companies to release that information.
The flow won.
Actionable Insights for the Digital Age
If you're a creator, a business owner, or just someone trying to navigate this mess, you have to stop fighting the "free" part and start leaning into the "expensive" part.
Don't sell "what." Sell "how." In a world where facts are a Google search away, the "what" is free. The value is in the "how"—the implementation, the consulting, the unique application of that information to a specific problem.
Curation is the new gold mine. We are drowning in free information. The value has shifted from the content itself to the person who can filter out the noise. If you can tell people what not to read, they will pay you for it.
Build on Open Foundations. If you're building a tech product, don't try to reinvent the wheel with proprietary silos. Use open-source tools. Use the "free" information that already exists to build something proprietary on top of it.
Protect your "expensive" data. If you have information that is truly valuable—your customer lists, your secret sauce, your private IP—treat it like it’s under constant pressure to leak. Because it is. Use encryption, use strict access controls, and assume that "free" is the default state the universe is trying to return to.
The tension Stewart Brand identified in 1984 isn't going away. If anything, it’s getting tighter. Information still wants to be free, and it still wants to be expensive. Success in the next decade depends on figuring out which side of that line your information belongs on.
📖 Related: Run the Gun Gauntlet: Why the Internet's Most Infamous Shock Site Won't Die
Stop trying to lock the door. Start building a better house.