If you’ve spent any time on the weather side of social media, you’ve hit the hurricane that is Joe Bastardi. He isn’t just a meteorologist. He’s a vibe. Or a storm. Depending on who you ask, he’s either the only guy telling the truth about the sky or he’s the most polarizing figure in modern meteorology.
His feed is a relentless mix of high-energy weather maps, wrestling metaphors, and sharp jabs at what he calls "climate ambulance chasing."
Most people come for the snow maps. They stay for the fight.
The Man Behind the Maps
Joe Bastardi isn't a newcomer who stumbled into a Twitter following. He’s a Penn State alum with decades of experience at AccuWeather before moving over to WeatherBELL Analytics as their Chief Forecaster. He’s also a bodybuilder and a former wrestling coach. That physical intensity? It translates 1:1 to his digital presence.
He writes like he talks—fast, aggressive, and with a level of conviction that makes standard TV weather reports look like a nap.
Why his Twitter is a battlefield
Honesty time: Joe Bastardi weather twitter is where the "consensus" goes to die. While the vast majority of climate scientists point to CO2 as the primary driver of global warming, Bastardi isn't buying it. He’s a vocal skeptic. He often cites geothermal activity, ocean cycles like the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO), and solar patterns as the real culprits.
This puts him at odds with... well, almost everyone in the institutional scientific community.
- He calls the current climate narrative "witchcraft" or "fraud."
- He frequently tweets about "Climate Optimums"—periods in history where it was warmer and, in his view, better for humanity.
- He uses his platform to challenge the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and other major agencies on their data sets.
It's messy. It’s loud. It’s exactly why he has hundreds of thousands of people hanging on his every tweet.
The "Analog" Approach to Prediction
One thing his critics and fans usually agree on? The guy knows his history. Bastardi uses an analog forecasting method. Basically, he looks at what the weather is doing right now and finds a year in the past where the patterns looked similar.
If 1954 had the same ocean temperature setup as 2026, he’s going to look at the 1954 hurricane season to tell you what’s coming in September.
Computer models like the EURO or the GFS are the gold standard for most forecasters. Joe? He uses them, but he doesn't trust them blindly. He’s often the first one to call out a "model fail" when a projected blizzard turns into a sunny afternoon. This skepticism of "the machines" resonates with a specific crowd that feels like technology has replaced human intuition.
Does he actually get it right?
It depends on who you ask and how you measure. He’s had some legendary "calls"—predicting major cold snaps or tropical developments days before the mainstream media caught on. But he’s also had some high-profile misses, especially when it comes to his long-range "cooling" predictions that haven't quite materialized the way he suggested they would back in 2011.
Yet, for a commodity trader or a snow removal business, his WeatherBELL insights are often seen as "must-watch" content. They aren't looking for a political debate; they want to know if they need to buy salt or hedge natural gas.
The "Weaponization of Weather"
Bastardi literally wrote the book on this—The Weaponization of Weather in the Phony Climate War. On Twitter, this is his main recurring theme. He argues that every single storm, whether it’s a late-season hurricane or a mid-west drought, is being used as political leverage.
You’ll see him posting screenshots of news headlines side-by-side with historical data from the 1930s. His point is usually: "We've seen this before, and it wasn't the end of the world then, so why is it a 'crisis' now?"
It’s a powerful narrative. It appeals to people who feel overwhelmed by "doom-scrolling" and climate anxiety. Bastardi offers a counter-narrative where the weather is just... the weather. Powerful, cycles-driven, and ultimately something we can adapt to.
Dealing with the "Climate Denier" Label
He doesn't run from it. He leans in.
While organizations like Skeptical Science have entire pages dedicated to debunking his claims—pointing out that his "human contribution to CO2" math ignores how carbon sinks work—Bastardi continues to post his own charts. He’s a fixture on Fox News and platforms like the Heartland Institute, cementing his role as the go-to expert for the "other side" of the climate conversation.
What You Should Watch For
If you’re following Joe Bastardi on Twitter for the first time, here’s how to decode the feed:
🔗 Read more: What Really Happened With the Abundant Life Christian School Shooting
- The "Big Dog" and "Long Ranger": These are his video segments. They are fast-paced. If you aren't a meteorology nerd, you might get lost in the talk of "isallobaric gradients" and "vorticity."
- The "Fighting" Spirit: Expect wrestling analogies. He views forecasting as a match between him and "The Euro" model.
- The Historical Context: He will almost always reference a year like 1938 or 1950. He wants you to know that "unprecedented" is a word used by people who don't read history.
- The Aggressive Punctuation: Lots of CAPS. Lots of exclamation points!!! It's high-energy stuff.
The Real Impact of His Feed
Whether he’s right about the "why" of climate change, his impact on the "what" of daily weather is undeniable. He forces other forecasters to defend their positions. He keeps the conversation on "observed data" versus "model projections."
For many, he's the "Weather Rebel." For others, he's a dangerous source of misinformation.
How to use his updates effectively
Don't just take one tweet as gospel. The best way to use Joe Bastardi's feed is as a counter-balance.
If the National Weather Service is saying one thing and Bastardi is saying the polar opposite, look at the maps yourself. See where the disagreement is. Usually, it’s in the "timing" or the "track" of a storm. By seeing both sides, you get a much better sense of the uncertainty in a forecast.
Weather isn't a settled science when it's 10 days out. It's a game of probabilities.
Actionable Insights for Following Weather Twitter:
👉 See also: Why Did Bryan Kohberger Target Maddie Mogen? What We Actually Know Now
- Check the Source: Bastardi represents a specific "analog" school of thought. Contrast his views with "ensemble-based" forecasters to see the full range of possibilities.
- Ignore the Politics, Focus on the Physics: If you want to know if it's going to snow, look at his "pressure maps" and "thickness charts." The political commentary is a separate layer.
- Look at the "Verify": After a storm passes, see who actually got the totals right. This is the only way to build a "trust list" of forecasters.
- Watch the Trends: If Bastardi starts talking about a "major pattern change" two weeks out, keep an eye on it. He’s often very good at spotting the start of a new trend before the models catch up.
The weather world is getting noisier. Between AI-generated forecasts and high-stakes climate politics, voices like Joe Bastardi’s aren’t going away. They are getting louder. Whether you agree with his stance on CO2 or not, he remains one of the most influential people in how the public perceives the power of the sky.
Next Steps:
Go to Twitter (X) and search for @BigJoeBastardi. Compare his latest "Long Range" outlook with the official NOAA Climate Prediction Center maps. You’ll likely see a massive difference in how they interpret the next 30 days of temperatures. Decide for yourself whose "analog" or "probabilistic" method holds more water as the weeks unfold.