Honestly, most people trying to fix a broken business or a dying ecosystem are just rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic. They focus on the numbers—the budget, the taxes, the specific quotas—and then act shocked when nothing actually changes.
Donella Meadows, a systems thinking pioneer who basically saw the world in high-definition while the rest of us were squinting at pixels, called these "leverage points." These are places within a complex system where a small shift in one thing can produce massive changes in everything else.
But here’s the kicker: leverage points are counterintuitive. You’ve probably spent your whole life being told to "focus on the data," but in the world of leverage points Donella Meadows described, data is often the weakest place to intervene. If you want to actually move the needle, you have to stop looking at the faucets and start looking at the mindsets that built the plumbing in the first place.
✨ Don't miss: Apple Stock History Chart: What Most People Get Wrong
The 12 Places to Intervene (Ranked from Weak to God-Tier)
Meadows famously listed twelve of these points. She ranked them by their power to transform a system. Most of us live and breathe at level 12, which is the least effective.
- Numbers and Parameters: This is where 99% of our attention goes. Subsidies, taxes, standards. If you change the interest rate by 0.5%, you’re "diddling with the details." It matters, sure, but it rarely changes the behavior of the system.
- Buffers: Think of the water in a tub or the cash in your savings account. Big buffers make a system stable, but they’re slow to react. If your buffer is too small, the system becomes jumpy and prone to crashes.
- Stock-and-Flow Structures: This is the physical layout. Think of the highway system or the plumbing in an old house. Once a city is built with sprawling suburbs, no amount of "number diddling" will easily fix the traffic. You’re stuck with the physical bones of the system.
- Delays: Systems hate delays. If it takes three years to build a power plant but demand for electricity is spiking now, you’re going to have an overshooting mess.
- Balancing Feedback Loops: These are the "brakes." They keep things from getting out of hand. If a company is growing too fast and losing quality, a balancing loop (like a quality control department) pulls it back to center.
- Reinforcing Feedback Loops: These are the "engines." Think of interest on a bank account or a virus spreading. The more it has, the more it gets. Meadows argued that slowing down a bad reinforcing loop is way more powerful than trying to build a bigger balancing loop to fight it.
- Information Flows: This is a big one. Meadows used the example of electric meters. In some houses, the meter is in the basement where no one sees it. In others, it’s in the front hallway. People in the "hallway" houses used 30% less electricity just because they had the info. No tax, no rule—just the data, delivered to the right person at the right time.
- Rules: The incentives, the punishments, the constraints. If you change the rules of a game, the players immediately change how they play.
- Self-Organization: The power to add, change, or evolve the system structure. This is basically the "evolution" button. If a system can rewrite its own rules, it’s incredibly resilient.
- Goals: This is where things get heavy. If the goal of a corporation is "profit at all costs," the system will behave one way. If the goal is "protect the local watershed," the same system—with the same people and the same technology—will act completely differently.
- Paradigms: The mindset out of which the system arises. This is the source code. The belief that "growth is good" or "nature is a resource for humans" is a paradigm. You change the paradigm, and the goals, rules, and numbers all follow.
- Transcending Paradigms: The "final boss" of systems thinking. It’s the realization that no paradigm is actually true. It’s the ability to stay flexible and realize that your current way of seeing the world is just one of many possible maps.
Why We Keep Failing at Systems Change
It’s kinda funny—and depressing—how often we get this wrong. Jay Forrester, the guy who mentored Meadows, noted that people usually know intuitively where the leverage points are. But then, they push the lever in the wrong direction.
Take "Growth." For decades, politicians and CEOs have treated growth as the ultimate silver bullet. Poverty? Growth. Unemployment? Growth. But in many systems, growth is actually the reinforcing loop that’s causing the instability. By pushing for more growth, we’re actually accelerating the collapse of the very system we’re trying to save.
🔗 Read more: How Boiler Tube Company of America Kept the Lights On (and What They’re Up To Now)
We also have a weird obsession with level 12 (Numbers). We argue about the exact percentage of a carbon tax for years. While we’re fighting over the decimal point, the leverage points Donella Meadows wanted us to look at—like the goal of the energy system or the paradigm of infinite consumption—remain untouched.
Real World Examples: From Business to Climate
If you’re running a business and your team is burnt out, you could try giving them a 5% bonus (Level 12: Numbers). It might help for a week. Or, you could look at the Information Flows (Level 6). Maybe they’re burnt out because they don’t see the impact of their work, or they’re getting conflicting data from three different managers.
Or, you could look at the Goal (Level 3). Is the goal "shipping 500 units a day" or "solving the customer's problem"? Changing that goal transforms how every single person in the building spends their Tuesday morning.
📖 Related: Rockstar Motorcars Nashville Tennessee: What You Should Know Before Visiting
In climate change, we often focus on "efficiency" (Numbers). We make cars that go a few more miles per gallon. But the higher leverage point is the Structure (Level 10) of our cities. If we didn't design cities that require cars to get a loaf of bread, we wouldn't need to worry so much about fuel efficiency. Even higher than that is the Paradigm (Level 2) that we are separate from nature rather than a part of it.
Getting Started with Leverage Points
You can’t just jump to "Transcending Paradigms" on a Monday morning before your coffee. It takes work.
First, you’ve got to draw the system. Stop looking at the individuals (the "villains" or "heroes") and start looking at the relationships. Where are the stocks? What are the flows?
Next, look for the missing feedback. Honestly, most systems are broken simply because the person making the decision doesn't feel the consequences of that decision. That’s a missing information flow. Fixing that is often the cheapest and most effective way to start.
Lastly, be humble. Meadows always said that leverage points are not a "sure-fire recipe." They are an invitation to think. Complex systems are messy, and they talk back. If you try to move a lever and the system fights you, don't just push harder. Step back and ask: "What goal is this system actually trying to achieve?"
The answer might surprise you.
Actionable Next Steps
- Audit your current "fixes": Take a project you’re struggling with. List the interventions you’ve tried. Are they all at Level 12 (Numbers)? If so, pick one point between Level 6 and Level 3 to experiment with.
- Identify the "Hidden Goal": Look at a department that isn't performing. Don't listen to what the mission statement says. Look at what the system actually produces. That output tells you what the real goal is.
- Expose the Paradigm: Ask "What would we have to believe for this current (broken) system to make sense?" That belief is your paradigm. Once you name it, it loses its power over you.
The brilliance of leverage points Donella Meadows gave us isn't in a magic formula. It’s in the permission to stop obsessing over the small stuff and start questioning the "why" behind the "how."