You’re sitting at brunch, and your friend leans in, eyes wide, and says, "I literally died when he said that."
Obviously, they didn’t die. They are sitting right there, poking at a piece of avocado toast. If you’re a certain kind of person—the kind who carries a red pen in their soul—you probably felt a tiny twitch in your eye. You want to correct them. You want to explain that unless they are a ghost, they meant figuratively. But here is the thing: the English language has already moved on without you.
Understanding what is meant by literally in the 21st century requires us to stop looking at dictionaries as stone tablets and start seeing them as mirrors. Language isn't a set of rules handed down by a bearded god of grammar; it is a living, breathing, slightly chaotic consensus.
The Great Dictionary Surrender
Back in 2013, the internet nearly imploded. This was the year that Google Search results and social media feeds became a battleground because major dictionaries like Merriam-Webster, Oxford, and Cambridge officially added a "second definition" for the word.
They admitted it. They put it in print.
Now, the definition includes a note about using the word for emphasis or to express strong feeling, even if the event didn't actually happen. To the purists, this was the linguistic apocalypse. To the linguists, it was just Tuesday.
Linguists call this "auto-antonymy" or a "contranym." It's a word that can mean its own opposite. Think about the word "dust." You can dust a cake with sugar (adding it) or dust the shelf (removing it). Or "sanction," which can mean to permit something or to penalize it. Literally has joined this weird, prestigious club of words that require context to make any sense at all.
Honestly, the "wrong" use isn't even new. We like to blame Gen Z or millennials for ruining the language, but that is historically inaccurate. F. Scott Fitzgerald used it "wrong." So did James Joyce. Charles Dickens, a man who basically owned the English language in the 19th century, wrote in Nicholas Nickleby that a character "literally feasted his eyes." Unless his eyes were eating a ham sandwich, Dickens was using the word for emphasis.
Why Our Brains Crave This Word
Why do we do it? Why can't we just say "really" or "extremely"?
Hyperbole is a fundamental human instinct. We are wired to exaggerate to convey the weight of our emotions. When you say you "literally" couldn't get out of bed, you are trying to communicate the physical heaviness of your exhaustion in a way that "I was very tired" just doesn't touch.
There is a concept in linguistics called the "Lexical Treadmill" (or sometimes the "Euphemism Treadmill"). Words that provide emphasis eventually lose their punch. Once "very" becomes common, we need "really." When "really" gets tired, we move to "totally." Eventually, we reach for the most "truth-telling" word we have—literally—and we use it to prop up our exaggerations.
It's a paradox. We use the word that means "this is 100% factual" to signal that "this is 100% a metaphor."
The "Literal" Evolution: A Timeline of Usage
If we look at the data from the Oxford English Dictionary (OED), the primary definition remains "in a literal manner or sense; exactly." This dates back to the 15th century. It comes from the Latin littera, meaning a letter of the alphabet. It was about the text. The "letter of the law."
👉 See also: Finding Cute Ladies Pics on Instagram: Why Your Feed Feels Stale and How to Fix It
By the 1760s, however, the emphatic usage started creeping in. It took about 250 years for the dictionaries to finally cave and list the secondary meaning. That's not a trend; that's a slow-motion architectural shift in how we speak.
Standard usage today generally falls into three buckets:
- The Strict Literal: "The town was literally underwater after the flood." (The water was actually there.)
- The Hyperbolic Literal: "I've literally told you a thousand times." (It was probably five times, but it felt like a thousand.)
- The Filler Literal: "I literally don't know." (Used as a vocal fry or a beat in the sentence, similar to "like" or "totally.")
The third one is where people get the most annoyed. It’s seen as "lazy" speech. But "lazy" is a judgmental word for what is actually just "informal social bonding." We speak differently with our friends than we do in a courtroom.
How to Navigate the Literal Minefield
If you are writing a white paper for a tech company or a legal brief, you should probably stick to the traditional definition. In those contexts, what is meant by literally is "exactly as stated." If you write that a server "literally exploded," your IT department is going to show up with a fire extinguisher. If the server just crashed, you've caused a false alarm.
However, in creative writing, blogging, or everyday speech, the "wrong" use is a tool for tone. It adds flavor. It shows personality.
When to stay strict:
- Scientific reporting.
- Legal documents.
- Medical advice.
- Instructions or manuals.
When to let loose:
- Texting.
- Storytelling.
- Satire.
- Emotional venting.
Linguistic drift is inevitable. If we fought every change, we'd still be speaking like we’re in a Beowulf poem. We’d be upset that "nice" no longer means "silly" (which it did in the 1300s) or that "awful" no longer means "full of awe."
Actionable Steps for the Language Conscious
You don't have to love the shift, but you do have to live with it. To use the word effectively without sounding like a "grammar snob" or someone who has lost touch with reality, consider these moves:
- Check your audience. If you're talking to a boomer boss, use "literally" only when you mean "actually." If you're marketing to Gen Z, the emphatic "literally" is practically a requirement for authenticity.
- Audit your "fillers." If you find yourself saying "literally" in every third sentence, it loses its power. Save it for the moments that truly need the extra weight.
- Stop the corrections. Correcting someone's use of "literally" in a casual conversation is rarely about the language and usually about power. It doesn't make the corrector look smart; it makes them look pedantic.
- Use semantic alternatives. If you want to be emphatic without triggering the grammar police, try "genuinely," "veritably," or "actually."
The reality is that literally has become a marker of intensity. It is the bold font of the spoken word. While it might be technically incorrect in a formal sense, it is socially "correct" in many modern circles. Language is a tool, not a cage. Use it to be understood, not just to be right.
Keep an eye on how the word continues to change. We are already seeing "literal" being used as an adjective for "standard" or "basic" in some niche internet subcultures. The ride isn't over yet.