So, the 4 Nations Face-Off finally happened, and if you weren't glued to your screen last February, you missed the closest thing we’ve had to a true best-on-best hockey tournament in nearly a decade. It wasn't the Olympics. It wasn't the World Cup. But honestly, seeing Sidney Crosby and Connor McDavid on the same power play felt like a fever dream that hockey fans have been chasing since 2016.
When the nations face off rosters were first dropped by the NHL and NHLPA, everyone had an opinion. "Canada's goaltending is a disaster," they said. "The US is too young." "Sweden’s defense is unfair." Looking back at the actual games in Montreal and Boston, some of those takes aged like milk, while others were pretty much spot on.
The Canadian Juggernaut and the Goalie Panic
Let’s talk about Canada first because, well, it’s Canada. When Don Sweeney and Jim Nill released the final list, the forward group looked like a video game cheat code. You had Crosby, McDavid, MacKinnon, and Brayden Point. That's a lot of hardware. But the real conversation wasn't about the goals; it was about who was supposed to stop them.
The goaltending trio of Jordan Binnington, Adin Hill, and Sam Montembeault had people sweating. Critics were screaming for Logan Thompson or even a veteran like Marc-André Fleury. But Binnington ended up being the rock Canada needed. He made 31 saves in that final 3-2 overtime win against the Americans, proving that maybe "big-game experience" actually means something.
One thing that kinda flew under the radar was the late defensive swap. Alex Pietrangelo had to pull out in late January, and Drew Doughty stepped in. People questioned if Doughty still had the wheels for a tournament this fast. He did. He fit right into a defensive core led by Cale Makar and Josh Morrissey that prioritized transition over pure bruising hits.
Why Team USA Almost Pulled It Off
Team USA was, on paper, arguably the most balanced team in the building. Their defensive depth was just stupidly deep. When you can roll out Adam Fox, Quinn Hughes, and Charlie McAvoy, you’re basically playing with three extra forwards on the ice.
👉 See also: Why Minnesota High School State Hockey Still Rules the North
But it wasn't just the blue line. The Tkachuk brothers brought that specific brand of chaos that makes playoff hockey great. They actually combined for four goals in the opening win against Finland. It felt like the U.S. was finally ready to shed the "perennial underdog" label.
The biggest roster drama? It had to be the Quinn Hughes injury situation. He was out, then he was back in for the later stages to replace McAvoy. It was messy. Despite the chaos, they pushed Canada to the absolute brink in Boston. If it weren't for a McDavid overtime winner 8:18 into the extra frame, we’d be talking about a very different outcome for USA Hockey.
Sweden and Finland: The Skill vs. System Debate
Sweden's roster was a dream for anyone who loves "beautiful" hockey. Their defense was basically an All-Star team: Victor Hedman, Erik Karlsson, Rasmus Dahlin, and Gustav Forsling. They played a puck-possession game that made other teams look like they were chasing ghosts. However, they struggled with finishing. They lost a heartbreaker to the U.S. 2-1 where they outshot the Americans but couldn't solve the goaltending.
Finland, as usual, played the "spoiler" role. They didn't have the star power of the other three, but they had Juuse Saros. And in a short tournament, a hot goalie is a terrifying thing. They managed an OT win against Sweden that threw the whole round-robin standings into a blender. Their roster relied heavily on the Florida Panthers' chemistry, with Aleksander Barkov and Anton Lundell carrying a heavy load.
👉 See also: Why the 2025 Zurich Classic Leaderboard Looked So Different This Year
Key Roster Adjustments and Snubs
No roster is ever "perfect," and the 4 Nations Face-Off had plenty of people complaining.
- The Czechia Exclusion: This was the biggest "political" issue. David Pastrňák didn't hide his frustration that the reigning World Champions weren't invited. It felt weird not having them there.
- The Goalie Snubs: Beyond Logan Thompson, many wondered why the U.S. went with Hellebuyck, Oettinger, and Swayman over some of the younger breakout stars. Turns out, Hellebuyck was the right call.
- Age vs. Speed: Canada took guys like Brad Marchand and Mark Stone. Fans wanted younger legs like Travis Konecny (who did make it) or maybe even a wild card like Macklin Celebrini. The "veteran" bet paid off, though, as Marchand's grit was vital in the physical games against the U.S.
Actionable Takeaways for Future Tournaments
If we learned anything from the 2025 rosters, it’s that international hockey has changed. The old "grind them down" style is dead.
- Prioritize Skating on the Blue Line: Every team that succeeded had defensemen who could lead the rush. If you can't skate, you can't play in this format.
- Chemistry Matters More Than Stats: Canada’s decision to take Sam Bennett and Anthony Cirelli—guys who play specific roles—over pure point producers like Mark Scheifele was controversial but effective.
- Short-Term Goalie Heat is King: You don't necessarily need the best goalie of the decade; you need the guy who is "on" for eight days in February.
The 4 Nations Face-Off served its purpose. It gave us a baseline for what the 2026 Olympic rosters should look like. Canada has their "Big Three" in Crosby, McDavid, and Makar. The U.S. has the deepest defense in the world. Sweden has the skill, and Finland has the system. Now we just wait for the next time these rosters hit the ice.
Keep a close eye on the NHL injury reports as we head into the next international break. The difference between a gold medal and a "thanks for coming" usually comes down to one or two injury replacements that nobody saw coming.