Walk into any commercial gym and you’ll see it. That guy in the corner. He’s 22, weighs 215 pounds, and has shoulders that look like bowling balls glued to his torso. He’s vascular. He’s dry. He is, by all accounts, a specimen. You look at him and that tiny voice in your head immediately whispers the question that has defined fitness culture for the last decade: Natty or not?
It’s a simple binary. "Natty" is shorthand for natural—someone who builds their physique through nothing but hard work, chicken breasts, and maybe some creatine. The "not" implies everything else. Testosterone replacement therapy (TRT), SARMs, old-school Trenbolone, or the latest designer peptides. Honestly, the term has evolved from a niche bodybuilding slang into a full-blown cultural obsession. It’s the primary filter through which we view every athlete, Hollywood actor, and fitness influencer on our screens.
People care because they feel lied to. When a Marvel actor gains 30 pounds of lean muscle in six months for a role and credits "eating a lot of yams," the internet revolts. We want the truth.
The Anatomy of the Natty or Not Movement
The whole "natty or not" phenomenon didn't just appear out of thin air. It grew out of a deep-seated frustration with the fitness industry's history of deception. For decades, supplement companies sold protein powders by putting a 300-pound "mass monster" on the label. They heavily implied that if you just bought this specific jug of whey, you’d look like him. That was a lie. Most of those guys were using enough gear to jumpstart a dead horse.
Then came the "fake natty" era. This is a specific type of influencer who claims to be 100% natural while clearly using performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs). Why do they lie? Money. If a creator admits to using steroids, they lose their "relatability." They can’t sell you a $50-a-month workout program as easily if the secret sauce is actually a needle in the glute.
The industry changed when guys like Kenny KO or the late Rich Piana started being brutally honest—or in Kenny’s case, literally sticking microphones in people’s faces at fitness expos. It turned into a spectator sport. Now, subreddits like r/nattyornot function as digital courtrooms where thousands of amateur detectives pore over photos of "gym-bros" to look for the telltale signs of chemical assistance.
🔗 Read more: Burning 4000 Calories a Day: The Truth About Excessive Energy Expenditure
Red Flags: How to Spot the "Not"
If you’re trying to figure out if someone is actually natural, you have to look past the lighting and the pump. There are physiological limits to what the human body can do without exogenous hormones.
First, look at the "androgen-sensitive" areas. The shoulders (deltoids) and the upper traps have a higher density of androgen receptors. When someone starts using PEDs, these muscles often explode in size, creating a "3D" or "capped" look that is nearly impossible to achieve naturally. If their shoulders look like they belong on an action figure but their calves are normal, something might be up.
Then there’s the skin. Hardness and "graininess" are huge indicators. Natural lifters tend to look a bit "softer" even when they are lean. If someone is 5% body fat but their skin looks paper-thin and they have veins running across their abdominals like a roadmap, they’re likely using compounds like Masteron or Winstrol to dry out.
Don't forget the timeline. This is the biggest giveaway. A natural lifter can expect to gain maybe 10-20 pounds of muscle in their first year of serious training. After that, the gains slow down to a crawl. If you see someone who has been lifting for five years suddenly pack on 15 pounds of lean mass in a single summer, that’s not "changing up the routine." That’s chemistry.
The FFMI Calculation
For those who want a bit of science, there’s the Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI). It’s basically a BMI for muscularity. You take your height, weight, and body fat percentage to calculate a score.
A famous study by Kouri et al. back in 1995 looked at 157 male athletes. They found that natural athletes almost never surpassed an FFMI of 25. Meanwhile, many of the steroid users in the study easily soared past 30. While it’s not a perfect rule—some genetic outliers do exist—an FFMI over 25 is usually where the "natty or not" debate starts getting very uncomfortable for the person being questioned.
Why Does It Even Matter?
You might think, "Who cares what someone else does with their body?"
Fair point. But it’s not about judging people's personal choices. It’s about the distortion of reality. When a 16-year-old kid scrolls through TikTok and sees a 19-year-old with a physique that took decades of professional-level doping to achieve, that kid develops body dysmorphia. He thinks he’s doing something wrong. He thinks his genetics are "trash" because he hasn’t reached that level in six months.
The "natty or not" discourse is a defense mechanism. It’s a way for the community to police its own standards and manage expectations. It’s about honesty in advertising. If you’re a professional athlete or an influencer making millions off your physique, your "natty" status is part of your brand’s integrity.
Look at the Liver King situation. Brian Johnson built an empire on the "nine ancestral tenets," claiming his physique came from eating raw organs and living like a caveman. He denied steroid use repeatedly. When his $11,000-a-month steroid regimen was leaked, it wasn't just a scandal; it was a betrayal of a community that believed in his message.
The Nuance of TRT and "Liver Health"
We also have to talk about the middle ground. It’s not 1990 anymore. We have "HRT" (Hormone Replacement Therapy) and "TRT" (Testosterone Replacement Therapy).
🔗 Read more: Natural ways to get rid of fluid retention: Why your body holds onto water and how to fix it
Is someone on TRT "natty"? Technically, no. They are using exogenous hormones. However, if they are simply bringing their levels up to a "high-normal" range because they were clinically low, they aren't exactly "blasting" gear. This is where the debate gets murky.
Then there are SARMs (Selective Androgen Receptor Modulators). These are often sold as "supplements" or "research chemicals" and are incredibly popular among younger lifters because they can be taken in pill form. They are NOT natural. They suppress your natural testosterone and carry significant risks, but because they aren't "injections," many people try to hide them under the natty umbrella. They don't belong there.
Psychological Impacts of the Debate
Living in a "natty or not" world is exhausting.
For the natural lifter, it can be frustrating to be accused of using when you’ve just worked your tail off for a decade. It’s the ultimate backhanded compliment. "You look so good I don't believe you're human." But on the flip side, it creates a culture of cynicism. We stop believing in excellence. We see a truly gifted athlete and immediately look for the needle mark.
The reality is that genetics play a massive role. Some people are just "hyper-responders" to training. They have the Myostatin deficiencies or the bone structure that allows them to look "enhanced" while being totally clean. These people are the unicorns of the fitness world, and they often get caught in the crossfire of the natty or not wars.
How to Navigate This as a Lifter
If you’re a beginner or intermediate trainee, stop worrying about everyone else’s status. Seriously. It’s a rabbit hole that leads to nowhere but resentment.
Instead, focus on your own data. Are you getting stronger? Is your recovery improving? Are you eating enough protein? Most people haven't even come close to their natural potential before they start wondering about "the dark side."
Here is what you should actually do:
- Track your progress: Use an app or a notebook. If your lifts are going up over months and years, you’re on the right track.
- Get blood work: If you’re genuinely concerned about your hormone levels, go to a doctor. Don't take advice from a guy on Instagram selling a "test booster."
- Audit your feed: If following a certain influencer makes you feel like garbage about your own body, unfollow them. Even if they are "natty," their 0.1% genetics might be giving you a false sense of what is achievable.
- Learn to spot the lighting: Half of the "not" in "natty or not" is just professional lighting, a deep tan, and a strategic pump. A "natty" lifter can look "not natty" for about 10 minutes in the right conditions.
The obsession with "natty or not" isn't going away. As long as there is money and fame attached to being muscular, people will push the limits of biology. The best thing you can do is arm yourself with the knowledge of what’s possible, stay skeptical of "miracle" transformations, and keep your eyes on your own weights.
📖 Related: How Do Skinny People Stay Skinny? The Science of Intuitive Regulation
The goal shouldn't be to look like someone else; it should be to find out what your own DNA is capable of when pushed to the limit. That journey is much more rewarding than any "research chemical" could ever offer.