Ever looked at a map of the United States and noticed how weirdly lopsided the NFL is? It's kind of a mess if you're a fan of symmetry. You have clusters of teams in the Northeast and California, while massive swaths of the Mountain West look like a total dead zone. If you’re living in Montana or Idaho, your "local" team might be an eight-hour drive away—or more.
People usually think the NFL teams USA map is a perfect reflection of where people live. It isn’t. Not really. It’s actually a living fossil of 1960s television markets, messy relocations, and billionaires fighting over territory.
📖 Related: PayPal Sports Betting Sites: What Most People Get Wrong
Take a look at the "empty" middle. From the Mississippi River to the Sierra Nevada mountains, there are huge gaps. Most people realize the Denver Broncos own a massive chunk of land, but they don't realize just how much. We are talking about a "territory" that spans multiple states including Wyoming, Montana, and parts of Nebraska. It's a lonely existence out there on the map.
The Coastal Crowding Problem
Look at the East Coast. It’s packed. You’ve got the Giants and Jets sharing a stadium in New Jersey (despite the "New York" name), the Eagles just down the road, and the Ravens and Commanders practically on top of each other.
It makes sense for the money. The population density is there. But for a fan, it creates these weird little bubbles where you can cross a county line and suddenly you're in "enemy" territory.
Then you have Florida and California.
- Florida: Three teams (Dolphins, Buccaneers, Jaguars).
- California: Three teams (49ers, Rams, Chargers).
Wait, didn’t California used to have four? Yeah, the Raiders left for Las Vegas in 2020. That move changed the NFL teams USA map significantly, creating a new hub in the desert. But even with the Raiders gone, California still feels crowded, especially with two teams sharing SoFi Stadium in Los Angeles. Honestly, the Chargers moving to LA is still a sore spot for folks in San Diego. It’s a classic example of how a dot on a map doesn't always represent where the hearts of the fans actually are.
Why the Map Has "Dead Zones"
You’ll notice states like Oregon, Utah, and Alabama are totally blank. No dots.
Portland, Oregon, is a massive metro area that could easily support a team. Salt Lake City is booming. So why aren't they on the map? It’s basically about TV markets and "protected territories." Existing owners don't want a new team moving in and stealing their viewers.
The Dallas Cowboys are the worst offenders here. Jerry Jones has a grip on the "Silver and Blue" territory that stretches way beyond Texas. If you tried to put a team in San Antonio or Austin, you'd have to deal with the Cowboys' shadow. San Antonio even built the Alamodome years ago hoping to lure a team, but they're still waiting.
And let’s talk about the Midwest.
The "NFC North" cluster—Green Bay, Chicago, Detroit, and Minnesota—is probably the most stable part of the map. These teams are close enough to have real, nasty rivalries, but far enough apart to have their own distinct cultures. You won't find many Bears fans in Green Bay, and you definitely won't find many Lions fans in Chicago.
The 2026 Landscape: What’s Actually Changing?
As we sit here in 2026, the map is stable but the "Global Markets" program is starting to blur the lines. The NFL isn't just a USA map anymore.
The Jaguars basically live in London for a part of the year. The league is handing out "international home territories" like candy.
- The Steelers have rights in Ireland.
- The Chiefs are all over Germany.
- The Dolphins are courting fans in Spain and Brazil.
If you were to draw a map of NFL "influence" in 2026, it would look like a spiderweb stretching across the Atlantic. But back home, the physical stadiums aren't moving. We’re still looking at the same 32 locations.
The only real "movement" right now is talk about expansion. With the 17-game schedule and now the expanded playoffs, the league is making more money than ever. There are whispers about getting to 34 or even 36 teams. If that happens, the NFL teams USA map will finally have to address the "Pacific Northwest Gap" (Portland) or the "Mountain West Gap" (Salt Lake City).
How to Actually Read the Map
If you’re looking at a map to pick a team or plan a trip, don't just look at the dots. Look at the divisions.
The NFL tries to keep divisions "geographic," but they fail hilariously sometimes. The Dallas Cowboys are in the NFC East. Look at a map. Dallas is nowhere near the East Coast. They’re further west than several teams in the "South" and "North" divisions.
Why? History. The rivalry with the Giants and Eagles is too profitable to break up. So, the map stays "wrong" for the sake of the record books.
Actionable Insights for the Map-Curious
If you want to understand the geography of the league better, here is what you should actually do:
📖 Related: Major League Baseball National TV Schedule: What Most Fans Get Wrong
- Check the "Primary Market" vs. "Secondary Market": Just because a team is in a city doesn't mean they own the whole state. The Buffalo Bills "own" Upstate New York, while the Giants and Jets fight over the city and Long Island.
- Look at "Drive-Time" Maps: If you're a fan in a state like Nebraska, your closest stadium might be Kansas City, but your "local" TV broadcast might show the Broncos. Check your local affiliate listings before you buy a jersey.
- Watch the "UFL" Factor: In 2026, the United Football League is filling some of the NFL’s gaps. Cities like St. Louis (who lost the Rams) and Birmingham have pro football again. If you live in an NFL dead zone, look at the spring league maps; they’re often designed specifically to hit the markets the NFL ignored.
The map is a snapshot of power, money, and old-school traditions. It isn't perfect, it isn't fair, and it probably won't change for a while—unless someone finally builds a stadium in London or Toronto.