If you’ve lived in New York for more than five minutes, you know the vibe of June. It’s humid, the school hallways smell like floor wax and anxiety, and everyone is obsessing over the NYS math regents exams. It is a rite of passage. It's also, honestly, a massive source of trauma for a lot of kids who feel like their entire future hinges on a three-hour window in a stuffy gymnasium.
People talk about these tests like they are some immovable monolith, but the reality is way more chaotic. Between the shifting "cut scores," the introduction of Next Generation Learning Standards, and the sheer weirdness of how New York scales grades, there is a lot of misinformation floating around. You’ll hear parents at bus stops saying you need an 85 to get into a good college, while some teachers are just praying their students hit the 65. Both are right, and both are kinda wrong.
The system is changing. If you haven't looked at an Algebra 1 or Geometry paper in the last two years, you’re basically looking at a different language.
The Reality of the NYS Math Regents Exams in 2026
The New York State Board of Regents has been under fire for years. Critics say the tests are too hard; others say they’ve been "dumbed down" through aggressive curving. What most people don't realize is that the NYS math regents exams aren't actually designed to test if you're a math genius. They are designed to measure if a school district is doing its job according to the state’s specific rubric.
Take the Algebra 1 exam. It’s the gatekeeper. You don't pass, you don't graduate. Simple as that. But the way it’s graded is wild. Because of the "scaling" process, you might only need to get about 30% of the actual points on the paper to "pass" with a 65. It sounds crazy, right? But the raw score to scaled score conversion is a closely guarded, scientifically calculated (and often controversial) table that changes slightly every year.
🔗 Read more: Hunter Biden and Jake Tapper: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
Algebra 1: The High-Stakes Gateway
Most students take this in 8th or 9th grade. It's the first real "big" test. The curriculum shifted recently to align with the Next Generation Standards, which basically means less rote memorization and more "explain your reasoning." If you just provide the answer $x = 5$ but don't show the work or explain the "why," you're losing points.
Actually, the state has been leaning hard into these multi-step "Part IV" questions. They are worth 6 points. If you mess up a negative sign in the first step, you can still get 5 points if your logic stays consistent. That’s a huge shift from the old days where a math error meant a zero.
Geometry: Where Dreams Go to Die?
Ask any high schooler which of the NYS math regents exams is the hardest, and 9 out of 10 will scream "Geometry." It’s the proofs. It’s always the proofs. Geometry requires a different type of brain—one that can visualize rotations, reflections, and dilations while simultaneously memorizing theorems about chords and tangents.
The failure rate for Geometry is historically higher than Algebra 1. Why? Because it’s often the first time students have to think logically rather than just computationally. You aren't just solving for $y$; you're proving why a triangle is congruent using ASA or SAS. It’s a different beast entirely.
Why the "Curving" Controversy Never Dies
There is a lot of talk about the "65" not being a real 65. In the world of psychometrics—the science of testing—New York uses something called Item Response Theory. Basically, they try to ensure that a 65 in 2024 means the same thing as a 65 in 2026, even if one year's test was technically harder.
But this leads to some weird outcomes.
In some years, you could leave almost half the test blank and still technically pass. This infuriates some educators who feel it devalues the diploma. On the flip side, advocates for students in underfunded districts argue that the tests are culturally biased or don't reflect what happens in a real-world career.
Betty Rosa, the Commissioner of Education, has been overseeing a massive "rethinking" of graduation requirements. There’s been a lot of talk about making the regents optional or replacing them with "performance-based assessments." But for now? They are still here. They are still the law of the land.
How to Actually Prep Without Losing Your Mind
If you’re a student or a parent staring down the June or January calendar, stop buying those $30 prep books that are 500 pages thick. No one reads those.
- Past Exams are Gold: The NYS Education Department (NYSED) publishes almost every single old exam on their website. They are free. Download the last five years of tests. The patterns are glaringly obvious once you see them.
- The "Easy" Points: In Algebra, there is always a question about graphing a function. In Geometry, there is almost always a construction. These are points you should never, ever lose.
- The Calculator is Your Best Friend: You need to know your TI-84 (or whatever version you're using) inside and out. If you don't know how to use the "Intersect" function to find the solution to a system of equations, you're doing twice the work for no reason.
- Read the Scaling Table: It’s public info. Look at how many raw points you need to hit your goal. If you’re just trying to pass, you might realize you only need to master the multiple-choice section and one or two big questions. It takes the pressure off.
The College Perspective: Does the Score Matter?
Here’s the truth: Most colleges outside of the SUNY/CUNY system don't really care about your specific regents score. They care about your GPA and your SAT/ACT. However, if you're staying in New York for college, a high score (usually 85+) on your NYS math regents exams can earn you a "Regents Diploma with Advanced Designation."
It looks good. It might get you out of a remedial math class in college. But honestly, if you get a 78, your life isn't over. No employer is going to ask to see your Geometry Regents score when you're 24 years old.
Common Misconceptions That Need to Go Away
"The June test is easier than the August test."
Total myth. The state goes to great lengths to ensure parity. August is usually only taken by students who failed in June, so the "vibe" is different, but the difficulty is statistically mapped to be identical.
"You can't use a calculator on the whole test."
Actually, for most math regents, you need a graphing calculator for the whole thing. The days of doing long division by hand on these tests are mostly over, though you still need to show the algebraic steps.
"If I fail, I can't graduate."
There are "appeals" processes. If you score between a 60-64, your school can sometimes appeal the result if your GPA is high enough. There are also alternative pathways. Don't let the "one test, one life" narrative freak you out.
What’s Changing in the Next Two Years?
We are currently in a transition period. The "Next Gen" standards are fully baking into the system. This means more focus on "modeling"—applying math to real-world scenarios. Instead of just "Solve for $x$," you'll see "The height of a water rocket is modeled by the function $h(t) = \dots$"
📖 Related: Who is Woodrow Wilson? The Complicated Legacy of America’s 28th President
It’s more reading. That’s the big secret. Modern math regents are secretly reading comprehension tests. If you can’t parse the paragraph to find the variables, you can’t do the math.
Actionable Steps for Success
If you're staring at a testing date on the horizon, do these three things immediately:
- Check your "Reference Sheet": You get a cheat sheet during the test. Most kids don't even look at it until the day of. Know what formulas are on there so you don't waste brain power memorizing them.
- Focus on "Part I": These are the 24 multiple-choice questions. They are worth 2 points each. That’s 48 points total. If you crush the multiple choice, you are 90% of the way to a passing grade before you even touch the "show your work" section.
- Use JMAP or Regents Review 2.0: There are localized NY sites like JMAP that organize past questions by topic. If you suck at "Completing the Square," you can literally just print out 50 "Completing the Square" questions from previous years. It's the most efficient way to study.
The NYS math regents exams are a hurdle, but they aren't a brick wall. They are predictable, standardized, and—dare I say—beatable. The "scary" reputation is mostly leftovers from parents who took them in the 90s when the scaling was less "generous." Take a breath. Look at the old tests. You've got this.
Next Steps for Mastery:
- Download the most recent June exam and set a timer for three hours to see where your baseline sits.
- Highlight every question on that practice test that you didn't even understand the instructions for—that’s your "must-learn" list for your teacher or tutor.
- Verify your calculator's battery life and ensure you know how to reset the RAM; proctors will often clear your memory before the exam starts, so you need to know how to put your settings back (like turning on "Diagnostic On" for correlations).