Everybody knew Pennsylvania would be a fistfight. But seeing the raw numbers from the PA exit polls 2024 tells a much weirder, more nuanced story than the "red vs. blue" cable news shouting matches suggest. If you've been following the 2026 post-election audits, you know that the Keystone State was basically the center of the universe on November 5.
Donald Trump didn't just win; he pulled off a 1.71% margin, grabbing 50.4% of the vote. That’s a big deal. Honestly, it’s the first time a Republican has cracked that 50% ceiling in Pennsylvania since 1988. Kamala Harris finished with 48.7%.
While the pundits were obsessing over "vibes," the actual voters were at the kitchen table worrying about the price of eggs. It sounds like a cliché, but the data proves it.
The Economy Was the Only Story That Mattered
When you look at the AP VoteCast data, the economy was the undisputed heavyweight champion of issues. About 43% of Pennsylvanians said the economy was their top priority.
And get this: Trump absolutely crushed it with that group, winning them 60% to 39%.
You've probably heard people say abortion was going to be the "blue wave" catalyst. In Pennsylvania, it didn't quite play out that way. According to the Roper Center, while Harris led Trump among voters who prioritized abortion (76% to 24%), only about 14% of the electorate actually listed it as their most important issue.
Basically, the "pocketbook" voters outweighed the "social issue" voters by a massive margin. It’s hard to win a state when half the people tell pollsters they are "worse off" financially than they were four years ago.
🔗 Read more: Emmanuel Macron: Why the French President Name Still Stirs Chaos
Among those who felt they were worse off? Trump took 80% of their votes.
Why the "Blue Wall" Had Cracks
It wasn't just one thing. It was a slow-motion crumbling of traditional voting blocs.
Take young voters, for example. In 2020, Joe Biden won the 18-29 crowd by double digits. In 2024, the PA exit polls 2024 showed Harris’s lead with this group shrinking significantly. Trump made huge inroads with young men under 30. He flipped the script there, turning a group Biden won by 9 points into a competitive battleground.
- Men: Trump 55%, Harris 43%
- Women: Harris 53%, Trump 45%
- White Voters: Trump 57%, Harris 42%
- Black Voters: Harris 86%, Trump 13% (Trump nearly doubled his support among Black men in some regions compared to 2020)
The Suburban Shift That Wasn't Enough
For months, we heard about the "collar counties" around Philadelphia. The theory was that Bucks, Chester, Delaware, and Montgomery counties would become so blue they’d drown out the rest of the state.
Steve Kornacki was pointing at his big map on NBC, noting that places like Cumberland County were trending more toward Democrats. And he was right—Democrats did make gains in some suburban areas. But it wasn't enough to offset the "red shift" in rural areas and the bleeding of support among working-class voters.
Union households? That’s usually a Democratic stronghold. But in 2024, Harris only carried union households 53% to 45%. That’s a dangerously thin margin for a Democrat in a state like Pennsylvania.
A State in a Bad Mood
The mood of the state was, frankly, grim. F&M Poll post-election re-interviews showed that 71% of voters thought the U.S. was on the wrong track.
When people are that unhappy, they usually fire the person in charge.
Even though Harris wasn't the president, voters viewed her as a continuation of the Biden administration. Biden's approval rating in the state was stuck around 33%. That’s a heavy anchor for any campaign to drag across the finish line.
The Independent Swing
Independent and unaffiliated voters were the "wild card" everyone talked about. It turns out they were split right down the middle until the very end.
The PA exit polls 2024 showed independents breaking 49% for Harris and 46% for Trump. It was close, but not the blowout Harris needed to survive the surge in the "T" (the rural middle of the state).
💡 You might also like: Person Struck by Train: The Grim Reality and What the Data Actually Tells Us
- Immigration: 25% of voters called this a pressing issue, and they went heavily for Trump.
- Leadership: Voters said they wanted a "strong leader" and someone who could "bring change." Trump won those specific "candidate qualities" metrics handily.
- Third Parties: Jill Stein and Chase Oliver combined for about 1% of the vote. In a race decided by 1.7%, those small slices actually matter.
What You Can Do With This Information
If you're trying to understand where Pennsylvania goes from here, stop looking at the party registration numbers. They're lying to you.
The real story is in the "issue salience." If you’re a political strategist or just a curious citizen, watch the inflation numbers. If the cost of living doesn't stabilize, the demographic shifts we saw in the Latino and youth vote in 2024 will likely become permanent features of the landscape.
Start looking at "unaffiliated" voter registration in Pennsylvania. It's the fastest-growing group in the state. These people don't care about party loyalty; they care about results.
The 2024 data shows that the "culture war" is often a distraction from the "grocery store war." To win in PA, you have to win the checkout line.
💡 You might also like: Is there a bank holiday today? Why your local branch might be closed unexpectedly
Keep an eye on the 2026 midterm data coming out now—see if the GOP holds those gains with Latino men and young voters, or if the "Trump effect" was a one-time thing. The answer to that will tell you who wins the White House in 2028.