Honestly, if you’re a basketball fan, there’s nothing quite like the feeling of the NBA Finals. It’s that weird mix of high-level stress and pure adrenaline. You’ve got these massive legacies on the line, and sometimes, a single bounce of the ball decides who gets a ring and who becomes a "what if" story. We all remember the recent stuff—the Nuggets finally getting their first title in 2023 or the Celtics reclaiming their throne in 2024—but looking back at past nba championship matchups reveals a lot about how the game actually evolved.
It’s not just about the stats. It's about the grit. The 2016 comeback, the 80s bloodbaths between the Lakers and Celtics, and even the weirdly underrated ones like the 2011 Mavericks run.
The 2016 Miracle: LeBron vs. the 73-Win Machine
You can’t talk about past nba championship matchups without starting here. Seriously. The Golden State Warriors weren't just good; they were historic. 73 wins in the regular season. Steph Curry was hitting shots from the logo like they were layups. They were up 3-1. In the history of the league, no one had ever come back from 3-1 in the Finals.
Then LeBron James and Kyrie Irving just… decided they weren't losing.
Game 5 and 6 were masterclasses. LeBron dropped 41 in both. But Game 7? That was a defensive slugfest. You remember "The Block." Andre Iguodala goes up for what looks like a guaranteed layup, and LeBron comes out of nowhere to pin it against the glass.
The final score was 93-89. It wasn't a high-scoring blowout. It was a war of attrition. Cleveland got its first title in 52 years, and the Warriors' "perfect" season was spoiled. Honestly, that series changed how we view "unbeatable" teams.
When the 80s Saved the League: Lakers vs. Celtics (1984)
If 2016 was the peak of the modern era, the 1984 Finals was the peak of the rivalry era. Magic vs. Bird. This was the first time they met in the Finals after their 1979 college title game.
The Lakers were "Showtime"—all about the fast break and flash. The Celtics were the "Blue Collar" squad—tough, physical, and a bit mean. In Game 4, Kevin McHale famously clotheslined Kurt Rambis. Just took him out. Today, that’s a multi-game suspension and a massive fine. Back then? It was just a way to say "welcome to the paint."
Boston ended up winning in seven games. Larry Bird averaged 27.4 points and 14 rebounds. The heat in the Boston Garden was so bad during Game 5—literally over 90 degrees inside—that Kareem Abdul-Jabbar had to use an oxygen mask. It was brutal. It was beautiful.
The One Nobody Saw Coming: Mavericks vs. Heat (2011)
Everybody thought the 2011 Finals was just a coronation ceremony for the Miami Heat. LeBron, Wade, and Bosh had just formed the "Big Three." They were the villains of the NBA. On the other side, you had the Dallas Mavericks, led by a 32-year-old Dirk Nowitzki and a bunch of veterans like Jason Kidd and Tyson Chandler.
🔗 Read more: Why NY Giants Osi Umenyiora Still Defines the Modern Pass Rush
Miami took a 2-1 lead. They were mocking Dirk for being sick. Basically, they got cocky.
Dirk, playing through a 101-degree fever in Game 4, put the team on his back. Jason Terry (who actually got a tattoo of the trophy before the season started) couldn't miss from three. The Mavs won three straight games to take the series 4-2.
It remains one of the most satisfying underdog stories in sports. It proved that chemistry and "want-to" can actually beat a super-team of superstars if the stars aren't aligned.
Michael Jordan’s "Three-Peat" Climax (1993)
The 1993 series between the Chicago Bulls and the Phoenix Suns was probably the peak of Michael Jordan's first act. Charles Barkley was the MVP that year. He was at his absolute best, and the Suns had home-court advantage.
Jordan didn't care.
He averaged—get this—41 points per game for the entire series. That is still an NBA record. The Bulls took the first two games in Phoenix, which basically stunned the world. The series ended in Game 6 with John Paxson hitting a wide-open three-pointer after a chaotic final possession.
The Bulls became the first team since the 60s Celtics to win three in a row. It was the end of an era because MJ retired shortly after (for the first time), leaving us all wondering what would have happened if he stayed.
Why These Matchups Still Matter Today
Looking back at these series isn't just a nostalgia trip. It helps us understand the "Why" behind today's NBA.
- Tactical Evolution: We went from the low-post dominance of Kareem and Hakeem to the 3-point explosion of the Warriors.
- Narrative Power: The league thrives on rivalries. Without Magic and Bird, the NBA might not have survived the early 80s.
- Player Empowerment: LeBron’s move to Miami and his return to Cleveland redefined how stars control their own destinies in past nba championship matchups.
Expert Insights on Finals Success
If you're trying to figure out who will win the next one, don't just look at scoring. Look at:
- Defensive Rating in the Fourth Quarter: The 2004 Pistons proved you don't need a 30-point scorer if you can hold the other team to 80 points.
- Veteran Presence: Look at the 2024 Celtics or the 2011 Mavs. You need guys who have seen it all to handle the pressure of a Game 7.
- Health Timing: The 2019 Raptors won because they were great, but also because the Warriors' roster literally fell apart with injuries to KD and Klay.
Next time you're watching a game, think about these moments. The NBA is a long, winding story, and every new Finals is just another chapter being written in the same book as the legends.
💡 You might also like: Why the Minnesota Timberwolves Black Jersey Still Dominates the NBA Style Scene
What to do next:
To truly understand how these legacies were built, your next step should be watching the full "Game 6" or "Game 7" mini-movies produced by the NBA. These 15-to-20 minute features use "phantom cam" footage and sideline audio that you never heard during the live broadcast. Start with the 2016 Game 7 mini-movie to see the raw emotion on the court after the final buzzer; it provides a perspective on the physical toll of these matchups that stats alone can't convey.