You’re probably familiar with the feeling. That slight, nagging itch on a Tuesday afternoon when you’re staring at a spreadsheet that doesn’t seem to matter to anyone, anywhere. You’re good at what you do. You’re "successful" by every standard metric: the title is there, the paycheck is comfortable, and your LinkedIn profile looks like a work of art. But if you vanished tomorrow, would the world actually be any worse off? Or would there just be one less person optimizing a click-through rate for a product nobody needs?
This is exactly what Rutger Bregman wants to talk about. The Dutch historian—the guy who famously told billionaires at Davos they should stop talking about philanthropy and start talking about taxes—has moved past just identifying problems. He's now obsessed with a concept he calls moral ambition.
Honestly, it’s a bit of a slap in the face for the "work-hard-play-hard" crowd. Rutger Bregman moral ambition isn't about being a "nice" person. It’s not about recycling your plastic or donating $20 to a charity once a year. It is a radical, aggressive, and frankly quite demanding framework for how we should spend the most precious resource we have: our time.
The Problem with the "Bermuda Triangle" of Talent
Bregman’s central thesis in his latest work is that we are currently living through a massive, quiet tragedy. We have more talented, highly educated, and driven people than ever before in human history. Yet, a huge chunk of that talent is being sucked into what he calls the "Bermuda Triangle" of careers: finance, consulting, and corporate law.
These aren't "bad" people. They are the smartest kids from the best universities. But instead of solving the climate crisis, preventing the next pandemic, or fixing our broken food systems, they are helping big companies move money around or navigating complex tax loopholes.
It’s a waste. A total, staggering waste of human potential.
👉 See also: Why Living Each Day Relative to the Day Before is the Only Way to Actually Improve
Bregman isn't just complaining, though. He’s pointing out a weird paradox. In the past, if you were ambitious, you wanted to build something, lead something, or change something. Today, ambition has been "captured" by the corporate ladder. We’ve been taught that being ambitious means getting a promotion. Bregman wants to reclaim that word. He thinks you should be ambitious—wildly, shamelessly ambitious—but about things that actually matter.
What is Moral Ambition, Exactly?
Most people think of morality as a set of "don'ts." Don't lie. Don't steal. Don't be a jerk.
Bregman flips this. To him, moral ambition is a "do." It’s the drive to be the best at something that makes the world significantly better. He defines it as a combination of four specific traits:
- The Idealism of an Activist: You actually care about the big picture and want to change the status quo.
- The Ambition of an Entrepreneur: You want to scale, you want to win, and you aren't afraid of power or influence.
- The Rigor of a Scientist: You don't just follow your "passion." You look at the data. You ask: "Where can I do the most good?"
- The Humility of a Monk: You’re willing to admit when you’re wrong and change course if the evidence shows your current path isn't working.
It’s a weird mix. Usually, we think of "ambitious" people as cutthroat and "moral" people as soft. Bregman argues that the most effective people in history—the ones who actually ended slavery or secured voting rights—weren't just "good." They were brilliant strategists who knew how to build organizations and win. They didn't want to be "noble losers." They wanted to change the world, and they did.
The "Noble Loser" Trap
This is where Bregman gets controversial, and I love it. He has no patience for what he calls the "noble loser."
You know the type. The activist who stays "pure" but never achieves anything. The person who refuses to compromise or work within the system, and as a result, stays on the fringes. Bregman argues that if you truly care about a cause—whether it’s ending factory farming or fighting the tobacco industry—you have a moral obligation to be effective.
Winning matters.
He often points to the British abolitionists of the 18th century. They weren't just dreamers. They were business-minded people who understood how to run campaigns, lobby politicians, and use the media. They were "morally ambitious" because they didn't settle for feeling good; they settled for nothing less than changing the law of the land.
Why "Bullshit Jobs" are Part of the Problem
You can’t talk about Rutger Bregman moral ambition without mentioning David Graeber’s "Bullshit Jobs" theory. Bregman builds on this, arguing that many of our most prestigious roles are socially useless.
Think about it. If all the nurses, teachers, and garbage collectors went on strike tomorrow, the world would grind to a halt within 48 hours. If all the private equity consultants and corporate lobbyists disappeared? Honestly, we might not notice for months. We might even be better off.
The tragedy is that the "socially useless" jobs often pay the most and have the highest status. Bregman wants to break that link. He wants to make "doing good" prestigious again. He wants the smartest 22-year-old at Harvard to feel embarrassed about taking a job at McKinsey when they could be working on AI safety or vaccine distribution.
The School for Moral Ambition
Bregman isn't just writing books; he’s building an ecosystem. He co-founded The School for Moral Ambition (SMA) to help people actually make the jump. It’s a non-profit foundation that runs fellowships and "Moral Ambition Circles."
The pitch is pretty straightforward: "We’ll pay you to quit your job and make a lasting impact."
They focus on what they call the SSS framework for choosing problems:
- Sizable: How many people (or animals) are affected? Is this a massive problem?
- Solvable: Is there actually a path to a solution, or are we just shouting into the void?
- Sorely Neglected: Are there already thousands of people working on this? If so, your marginal impact might be low. You want to go where the talent is missing.
Currently, they are tackling things like the "Food Transition" (getting us away from industrial animal farming) and fighting "Big Tobacco." In 2026, they are even launching a "Tax Fairness Fellowship" to take on global tax evasion.
It’s not just for kids, either. They look for people with 5 to 10 years of experience—lawyers, marketers, lobbyists—who have real skills but are stuck in the wrong "ladder." They provide the training and the network to help these people pivot their careers toward high-impact work.
Is This Just Effective Altruism with a Better PR Team?
If you’ve heard of Effective Altruism (EA), this might sound familiar. And yeah, there’s a lot of overlap. Both movements care about data, impact, and "doing the most good."
But there’s a vibe shift here.
EA has often been criticized for being a bit... robotic. It can feel hyper-rationalist and, at times, disconnected from the messy reality of human emotions and politics. Bregman’s "moral ambition" movement feels more human. It’s less about "earning to give" (making millions at a hedge fund to donate it) and more about "giving your career."
He also emphasizes "Radical Kindness" and inclusivity. It’s less about being a "saint" and more about finding a community of people who are just as fed up with the status quo as you are.
The Cost of Staying Put
Let’s be real. Quitting a stable, high-paying job is terrifying. We have mortgages, kids, and a deep-seated fear of what people will think if we "throw away" a prestigious career.
Bregman acknowledges this. He says he wrote his book Moral Ambition during a bit of a midlife crisis. He looked at people who were actually "doing" things—the activists, the scientists, the risk-takers—and felt "moral envy." He realized that having "skin in the game" is more fulfilling than just commenting from the sidelines.
The hidden cost of staying in a "bullshit job" isn't just that you aren't helping the world. It’s what it does to you. It’s the slow erosion of your idealism. It’s the way you have to split your personality between who you are at home and who you are at the office.
How to Start Living with Moral Ambition
You don't have to quit your job tomorrow morning (though if you do, send Rutger a postcard). Living with more moral ambition is a process of recalibration.
It starts with an honest audit. Look at your week. How much of your energy went toward something that will matter in 50 years? If the answer is "zero," that’s a data point, not a death sentence.
1. Expand Your Moral Circle
Stop just caring about the things that are right in front of you. Think about future generations. Think about people on the other side of the planet. Think about the billions of animals in factory farms. When you widen the circle, the "important" problems at your office suddenly start to look very, very small.
2. Find Your "Circle"
Doing this alone is impossible. You’ll just get burnt out or convinced by your "reasonable" friends that you’re being crazy. The School for Moral Ambition encourages people to form small groups of 6 to 8 peers. Talk about your career goals. Hold each other accountable. It’s harder to ignore your conscience when five other people are asking you why you haven't made a move yet.
3. Focus on Skills, Not Just Passion
"Follow your passion" is actually pretty bad advice. Passion is often just a reflection of what you’re already doing. Instead, look at your skills. Are you a great writer? A brilliant coder? A master of logistics? Now, take those skills and point them at a "Sizable, Solvable, and Neglected" problem.
4. Reject the "Noble Loser" Mindset
If you’re going to do good, do it well. Be professional. Be strategic. Be ambitious. Don't be afraid to win. If you’re fighting for a better world, you should be just as driven as the person fighting for a bigger market share.
The Next Step
If this resonates with you, the worst thing you can do is just "agree" and move on. That’s just "awareness," and as Bregman likes to say, awareness doesn't change anything.
Start by looking into The School for Moral Ambition. They have a wealth of resources, from "Explainers" on why certain cause areas are neglected to information on their 2026 fellowship cycles.
Even if you aren't ready for a fellowship, you can join or start a Moral Ambition Circle in your city. It’s a way to start the conversation with people who are asking the same uncomfortable questions you are.
Ultimately, moral ambition is about realizing that your talent is a gift—and wasting it is the only real failure. You’ve got about 80,000 hours in your career. How many of them have you used so far? And more importantly, what are you going to do with the ones you have left?
Next Steps for Action:
- Audit your impact: Spend 30 minutes tonight listing the primary outputs of your current job. Ask yourself: if this work stopped tomorrow, who would suffer? If the answer is "nobody," it's time to look for a transition.
- Identify a "Sorely Neglected" cause: Research global problems that aren't getting the headlines but have massive potential for change—like indoor air quality or global tax transparency.
- Connect with a community: Check the School for Moral Ambition website to find an active "Circle" near you or sign up for their newsletter to track upcoming 2026 fellowships in North America and Europe.