If you spent any time on the internet in the early 2010s, you probably remember the name Sarah Jones. It was everywhere. One day she was the golden girl of the sidelines, a captain for the Cincinnati Ben-Gals, and the next, she was the center of a legal firestorm that felt like a scripted TV drama. But this wasn't a script. It was a messy, real-life intersection of a high-profile NFL career, a teaching job in Kentucky, and a landmark lawsuit that literally changed how the internet works today.
Honestly, most people only remember the headlines. They remember the mugshot or the Bengals uniform. But the story of Sarah Jones Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader is actually two very different stories that happened at the same time. One was a criminal case that ended her teaching career, and the other was a massive federal lawsuit against a gossip website that went all the way to the U.S. Court of Appeals.
The Dual Life of a Ben-Gals Captain
Sarah Jones wasn't just a face in the crowd. She was a leader on the squad. For four years, she balanced the high-energy world of the NFL with her day job as an English teacher at Dixie Heights High School in Northern Kentucky. By all accounts, she was successful. She was a "Ben-Gals" captain. She was a popular teacher.
Then things started to unravel.
It started in late 2011. Rumors began swirling around the school and the Cincinnati area. People were talking about an inappropriate relationship between Jones and one of her students. By December 2011, the pressure became too much. Jones resigned from both the Bengals cheerleading squad and her teaching position. She claimed at the time she was just trying to escape the gossip, but the legal system had other plans.
The Criminal Case and Cody York
In early 2012, the situation turned from a "scandal" into a criminal prosecution. Jones was indicted on charges of sexual abuse and using electronic communication to induce a minor. The "minor" in question was Cody York, a 17-year-old student she had taught.
Here is the thing that confused everyone at the time: Cody York and his family weren't the ones pushing for charges. They actually supported her. On the day of her arraignment, York and his parents were in the courtroom sitting behind her. It was bizarre to watch.
Eventually, Jones took a plea deal in October 2012. She pleaded guilty to misdemeanor sexual misconduct and felony custodial interference. She avoided jail time, getting five years of probation instead. But the price was her career. She was banned from teaching ever again.
👉 See also: NCAA Football Week 5: What Really Happened to the Superteams
"We made a poor choice together," she told Dateline NBC shortly after the sentencing. She and York even stayed together, getting engaged in 2013. They portrayed themselves as a couple in love who had just met at the "wrong time."
The Dirty.com Lawsuit: A Fight for Reputation
While the criminal case was blowing up her life, Jones was simultaneously fighting a different battle in federal court. This is the part of the Sarah Jones Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader story that actually matters for the history books.
Back in 2009—years before the student scandal—an anonymous post appeared on the gossip site TheDirty.com. The post claimed Jones had "slept with every other Bengals player" and suggested she had contracted STDs from her ex-husband.
Jones sued the site's owner, Nik Richie (Hooman Karamian). She argued that the posts were totally false and had ruined her reputation long before the student relationship ever started.
Why This Case Changed the Internet
This wasn't just a "he-said, she-said" gossip fight. It became a massive test for Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. Basically, Section 230 usually protects website owners from being sued for things their users post. If someone posts something mean about you on Facebook, you sue the person who wrote it, not Mark Zuckerberg.
But Jones’s lawyer, Eric Deters, argued that Nik Richie wasn't just a passive host. He claimed Richie "developed" the content by adding his own snarky comments, like asking why high school teachers were "freaks in the sack."
- First Trial: Resulted in a hung jury.
- Second Trial: A jury awarded Sarah Jones $338,000 in damages.
For a moment, it looked like a massive win for Jones. It was the first time a website owner had been held liable for user-generated content in this way.
The Reversal and the Final Word
The victory didn't last. In 2014, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals stepped in. They overturned the $338,000 award. The judges ruled that even if the comments were gross or mean, the website was still protected by federal law because the core defamatory statements came from an anonymous user, not Richie himself.
This was a huge blow to Jones, but a massive win for the "open internet." If the ruling had gone the other way, websites like Reddit, Yelp, or even Amazon could have been held responsible for every single review or comment posted on their platforms.
Where is Sarah Jones Now?
After the media circus died down, Sarah Jones mostly vanished from the public eye.
Her life in 2026 is a far cry from the NFL sidelines. She can’t teach. She isn't a cheerleader. After her probation ended and the lawsuits settled, she focused on rebuilding a private life. Her lawyer once mentioned she had interests in pursuing a career in law, though no public records confirm she became an attorney.
Her relationship with Cody York, which was so central to the 2012-2013 news cycle, eventually faded from the headlines as well. Like most "scandal" figures, she has sought the "right to be forgotten" that so many internet users crave.
Lessons from the Sarah Jones Era
The saga of the Sarah Jones Cincinnati Bengals cheerleader is more than just a tabloid story. It’s a case study in how quickly a reputation can be dismantled in the digital age.
If you are looking for takeaways from this complex story, consider these realities:
- Digital Permanence: The posts on TheDirty remained online even as she fought them in court, proving that once something is "out there," you can't really take it back.
- Legal Limits: Section 230 is an incredibly powerful shield for tech companies. Jones’s failure to win her appeal cemented the idea that "intermediaries" are rarely responsible for user speech.
- The Power of Narrative: Jones tried to frame her relationship as a "forbidden love," while the state framed it as a "position of authority" violation. The law cares about the latter, regardless of how the individuals involved feel.
For those interested in the intersection of sports culture and internet law, the Jones case remains a primary reference point. You can't talk about the evolution of online defamation without talking about the Ben-Gal who decided to fight back.
To understand the full scope of this story, you should look into the specific language of Section 230 and how the Sixth Circuit's ruling in Jones v. Dirty World Entertainment continues to protect social media platforms today.