History is messy. If you ask the average person about the Scots war with England, they probably picture Mel Gibson in blue face paint screaming about freedom. It’s a great movie, sure, but it’s mostly fiction. The real story of the long-running conflict between these two neighbors is way more complicated, darker, and honestly, a bit more frustrating than Hollywood lets on. It wasn't just a simple case of "Scotland vs. England." It was a chaotic scramble for power involving French interference, family feuds that lasted generations, and a surprising amount of paperwork.
The trouble really kicked off because of a tragic accident. In 1286, King Alexander III of Scotland rode his horse over a cliff in the dark during a storm. He died, and suddenly, Scotland had no clear heir. This wasn't just a local tragedy; it was a geopolitical nightmare. Without a strong king, the country was vulnerable, and Edward I of England—a man nicknamed "Longshanks" and "Hammer of the Scots"—was more than happy to "help" settle the dispute.
How the Scots War With England Actually Started
You've probably heard of the "Great Cause." This was the legal process where Edward I was invited to arbitrate between the various claimants to the Scottish throne. There were thirteen competitors, but the main ones were Robert Bruce (grandfather of the future king) and John Balliol. Edward didn't do this out of the goodness of his heart. He demanded that whoever he picked must acknowledge him as their Lord Paramount. Basically, he wanted to be the boss of the boss.
John Balliol won the crown but ended up being a bit of a puppet. Or at least, that’s how the history books often frame him. In reality, Balliol was stuck between a rock and a hard place. When Edward tried to force Scottish nobles to fight in his wars in France, the Scots finally snapped. They signed the "Auld Alliance" with France in 1295, which is essentially the ultimate "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" move. That treaty stayed on the books for centuries. Edward was livid. He invaded, sacked the town of Berwick-upon-Tweed with brutal efficiency, and stripped Balliol of his royal vestments. They called Balliol "Toom Tabard"—Empty Jacket.
This sparked the first real phase of what we now call the Wars of Scottish Independence. It wasn't just one big war. It was a series of campaigns, guerrilla raids, and massive pitched battles that dragged on from 1296 until the mid-1300s.
The Wallace Factor
William Wallace wasn't a noble. He was a knight's son, basically a nobody in the eyes of the high-ranking Earls. But he was a brilliant tactician. At the Battle of Stirling Bridge in 1297, he and Andrew Murray used the geography of the land to trap the English army on a narrow wooden bridge. It was a slaughter. For a brief moment, Wallace was the Guardian of Scotland.
✨ Don't miss: Hotel Carlton Nob Hill: Why This San Francisco Classic Is Actually Worth The Hype
But things went south fast. A year later, Edward I brought a massive army—complete with longbowmen—to Falkirk. Wallace was defeated. He spent years as a fugitive before being betrayed, captured, and dragged to London for a traitor's death. His execution was meant to be a final warning to the Scots. Instead, it turned him into a martyr.
Robert the Bruce and the Long Game
If Wallace was the spark, Robert the Bruce was the engine. Bruce is a fascinating, morally grey character. He spent years switching sides, playing both the English and Scottish interests against each other to protect his family’s claim to the throne.
In 1306, he did something radical. He murdered his rival, John Comyn, in a church. It was a desperate, violent act that got him excommunicated by the Pope. With nothing left to lose, he had himself crowned King of Scots at Scone. The early years of his reign were a disaster. He was defeated in battle, his family was captured or killed, and he supposedly spent time hiding in a cave watching a spider try to spin a web. Whether the spider story is true or not, the sentiment remains: he had to learn how to fight a different kind of war.
Bruce stopped trying to fight the English in big, open battles. He started a campaign of "scorched earth." He destroyed Scottish castles so the English couldn't garrison them. He led fast, brutal raids into Northern England. By the time Edward II—the much less competent son of Longshanks—finally marched north in 1314, Bruce was ready.
Bannockburn: More Than Just a Battle
The Battle of Bannockburn is the one everyone remembers. It’s the high-water mark of the Scots war with England. Even though the English outnumbered the Scots significantly, Bruce used the boggy ground to his advantage. He organized his infantry into "schiltrons"—tight circles of men bristling with long pikes. The English cavalry charged right into them and got stuck.
🔗 Read more: Miramar Beach FL Zip Codes: Why Everyone Gets the Address Wrong
It was a total rout. Edward II fled for his life. But here’s the thing: Bannockburn didn't end the war. England refused to recognize Scotland as an independent nation. It took another fourteen years of Bruce raiding as far south as Yorkshire and a formal appeal to the Pope—the Declaration of Arbroath in 1320—to finally get some diplomatic traction.
The Declaration of Arbroath is one of the most famous documents in Scottish history. It contains that stirring line: "It is in truth not for glory, nor riches, nor honours that we are fighting, but for freedom – for that alone, which no honest man gives up but with life itself." It was a PR masterclass. It told the Pope that the Scots weren't just rebels; they were a sovereign people with a right to choose their leader.
The Second War: A Forgotten Conflict
Most people think the story ends with Bruce’s death and the Treaty of Edinburgh-Northampton in 1328. It doesn't. Not even close.
When Robert the Bruce died, his son David II was just a child. This gave the "Disinherited"—Scottish nobles who had supported the English—a chance to reclaim their lands. Backed by the new English King, Edward III, they invaded in 1332. This kicked off the Second War of Scottish Independence.
✨ Don't miss: Is Casa Costera Isla Verde Actually Worth the Hype? What You Need to Know Before Booking
This era was even more devastating for the common people. It involved the Battle of Dupplin Moor and the Battle of Halidon Hill, both of which were crushing defeats for the Scots. David II ended up spending eleven years as a prisoner in England after being captured at the Battle of Neville’s Cross. The war basically devolved into a stalemate. England couldn't conquer Scotland, and Scotland couldn't stop the English from trying. Eventually, the conflict merged into the larger Hundred Years' War between England and France.
Why This History Still Rattles Around Today
The legacy of the Scots war with England isn't just in dusty textbooks. You can see it in the ruins of the Border Abbeys like Melrose and Jedburgh, which were burned repeatedly by English raiding parties. You see it in the "Common Ridings" festivals in towns like Hawick and Selkirk, where locals still ride the boundaries of their land to commemorate the defense against English incursions.
There’s also a deep cultural memory of the "Rough Wooing" in the 1540s, a later conflict where Henry VIII tried to force a marriage between his son and the infant Mary, Queen of Scots, by burning half of Edinburgh to the ground.
It’s easy to look at this as just a series of dates. But for the people living in the "Debatable Lands" along the border, war was a constant reality. This gave rise to the Border Reivers—clans like the Armstrongs and Graham’s who owed loyalty to no king and survived by stealing cattle and raiding both sides of the border. They were the original outlaws, and their lawlessness was a direct result of the centuries of warfare between the two crowns.
Myths vs. Reality
One big misconception is that this was a war of ethnicities. It wasn't. The Scottish nobility were mostly Anglo-Norman. They spoke French and Latin. Many held lands in both England and Scotland. This was a war of feudal loyalty and sovereignty, not necessarily "nationalism" in the modern sense.
Another myth? That the Scots were always the underdogs. While England had more resources and a larger population, Scotland had the home-field advantage and a tactical flexibility that often left the English frustrated. The Scots became masters of guerrilla warfare, making it incredibly expensive and exhausting for England to maintain an occupying force.
Essential Sites for History Lovers
If you actually want to understand the scale of the Scots war with England, you have to get your boots on the ground. The geography shaped the strategy.
- Stirling Castle: Known as the "Key to the Kingdom." Whoever held Stirling controlled the passage between the Highlands and Lowlands.
- The Borestone at Bannockburn: There's a great visitor center there now that uses 3D tech to show how the battle unfolded. Standing on the field helps you realize how narrow the corridor of land actually was.
- Arbroath Abbey: This is where the famous Declaration was signed. The ruins are haunting and beautiful.
- Caerlaverock Castle: A unique triangular castle on the Solway Firth that survived multiple sieges. It’s a perfect example of the defensive architecture born from this era.
Practical Steps for Deeper Research
If this period of history grabs you, don't just stick to the popular accounts.
- Read the primary sources (in translation): Look up the Brus by John Barbour. It's an epic poem written roughly fifty years after Robert the Bruce’s death. It’s biased as heck, but it gives you a feel for how the Scots wanted to be remembered.
- Check out the "NAS" records: The National Archives of Scotland has digitized many documents from the 14th century. Seeing the actual seals and signatures of the people involved makes it feel real.
- Explore the Border Reiver history: Books like The Steel Bonnets by George MacDonald Fraser give a visceral look at the aftermath of the wars on the border communities.
- Visit the "Secret" Battlefields: Sites like Roslin (1303) or Loudoun Hill (1307) are often overlooked but were crucial to Bruce's early success.
The conflict between Scotland and England didn't really "end" until the Union of the Crowns in 1603, and even then, it took another century for the Act of Union in 1707. Understanding the medieval wars is the only way to understand why the relationship between these two nations is still so unique and, at times, incredibly tense. It’s a story of survival against the odds, but also of the brutal cost of ambition.