Honestly, if you look back at 1996, the world was a completely different place. We didn't have social media to vent our frustrations, so we used the tabloids. And boy, did they have a field day with Demi Moore and her role in Striptease. It wasn’t just a movie; it was a full-blown cultural scandal.
People were obsessed.
The media dubbed her "Gimme Moore." Why? Because she negotiated a $12.5 million salary. At the time, that was an astronomical, record-breaking figure for a female lead. It put her on the same playing field as the biggest male action stars of the decade. But instead of being cheered for breaking the glass ceiling, she was essentially dragged through the mud for it.
The backlash was brutal.
The $12.5 Million Question: Was Striptease a Mistake?
When you talk about Striptease, you have to talk about the money first. That’s how the public approached it. Usually, when a male star like Sylvester Stallone or Bruce Willis—who was Moore’s husband at the time—bagged a $20 million paycheck, it was seen as a badge of honor. It meant they were "bankable."
👉 See also: Ray Nicholson and Sara Sampaio: What Really Happened with Hollywood’s Low-Key Power Couple
But when Demi did it? The vibe was different.
Critics and the public seemed personally offended that she was getting paid that much to play an exotic dancer. In the film, she plays Erin Grant, a former FBI secretary who starts stripping at the "Eager Beaver" club in Miami to fund a custody battle for her daughter. It was based on a Carl Hiaasen novel, which, if you’ve read it, is actually a dark, weirdly funny satirical crime story.
The movie, however, didn't quite nail that tone.
It was messy. Director Andrew Bergman—the guy behind Blazing Saddles—seemed to be making a wacky comedy, while Moore played her part with the intensity of a Shakespearean tragedy. That disconnect is basically why the movie felt so "off" to audiences. Roger Ebert famously pointed out that while the supporting cast was hilarious, Moore's character was a "wet blanket" on the party.
💡 You might also like: Nettie Hancock Washington Douglass: What Really Happened When Two Dynasties Met
Numbers that don't lie
Despite the "bomb" label often attached to it, Striptease wasn't a total financial disaster. Look at the data:
- Budget: Roughly $50 million.
- Domestic Box Office: A disappointing $33 million.
- Global Total: Over $113 million.
So, while Americans weren't buying it, the rest of the world certainly was. It actually made a profit. But in the eyes of Hollywood's elite, the damage was done. The film swept the Razzies, winning six awards, including Worst Picture and Worst Actress.
The Shaming of a Superstar
Demi Moore has recently opened up about this era, especially while promoting her 2024 film The Substance. She’s been pretty candid about how it felt to be "shamed" for her body and her paycheck. She’s noted that because the film dealt with the world of stripping, people felt they had permission to tear her down.
"It was as if I had betrayed women," she told The New York Times.
Think about that. She was the highest-paid actress in the world, yet she was being treated like she’d committed a crime. The industry basically used the movie’s critical failure as an excuse to punish her for asking for what she was worth. It’s a classic case of "how dare she?"
She wasn't just taking her clothes off; she was taking the industry's money.
Interestingly, her salary for Striptease actually helped other women. Immediately after her deal was signed, the "asking price" for stars like Julia Roberts, Meg Ryan, and Jodie Foster shot up. She took the heat so they could get the raises.
Why the Movie Still Matters Today
You can’t talk about the history of women in film without mentioning this specific moment. It represents a turning point where the "perfection" of the 80s and 90s met the harsh reality of gender politics.
Moore went to extreme lengths to prepare. She visited real clubs in New York and Florida, talking to dancers and learning the trade. She did yoga for months to get the flexibility needed for the routines. On the first day they filmed a stripping scene, 200 extras were in the crowd. Apparently, the room got so loud and chaotic that production had to stop just to get people to calm down.
There was a genuine voyeuristic frenzy around her.
And yet, for all the skin shown, the movie is surprisingly tame by today’s standards. It’s more of a quirky Florida crime caper than a "steamy" thriller. Burt Reynolds is arguably the best part of the whole thing, playing a sleazy, sugar-obsessed congressman with hair plugs. He leaned into the absurdity in a way the film desperately needed.
Actionable Takeaways from the Striptease Era
If we're looking for the "lesson" here, it's about the cost of being first.
- Context is everything. Moore’s salary was a victory for pay equity, even if the movie itself didn't live up to the hype. If you're negotiating for a raise, remember that your "value" is often determined by the last person who had the guts to ask for more.
- Separate the art from the business. You can be a brilliant negotiator and still have a project fail creatively. One doesn't necessarily invalidate the other.
- The "Shame" Cycle is real. Even today, women in the public eye are often criticized for their choices regarding their bodies or their finances in a way men simply aren't. Recognizing that pattern is the first step to breaking it.
The next time you see a headline about a female actor getting a "disappointing" payout or being "overpaid," think back to 1996. Demi Moore stood her ground, took the $12.5 million, and changed the industry forever. She might have been panned by the critics, but she won the long game.
If you want to understand the modern landscape of Hollywood pay, go back and watch the interviews from the Striptease press tour. You’ll see a woman defending her right to exist on her own terms, a decade or two before that was considered "brave."
💡 You might also like: Leslie Carter Death: What Really Happened to the Forgotten Sister?
To see how this career-defining moment influenced her later work, look at her performance in The Substance. It’s a spiritual successor to the themes of body image and aging that the world wasn't ready to discuss back when she was on that stage in Miami.