The 75: Why This Dirty Cop Documentary Is Still Hard to Watch

The 75: Why This Dirty Cop Documentary Is Still Hard to Watch

Michael Dowd wasn't just a bad cop. He was a brand. In the early 90s, the 75th Precinct in East New York was basically the Wild West, and Dowd was the self-appointed sheriff of a criminal empire that operated right out of a patrol car. If you’ve seen The 75, you know it’s not your typical "true crime" fluff. It’s a gut-punch. It’s a sweaty, high-speed chase through a version of Brooklyn that doesn’t exist anymore, led by a man who admits, with terrifying charisma, that he just wanted to be a gangster.

Most people think of police corruption as a few bribes or a "tribute" here and there. Dowd and his partner, Kenny Eurell, took it to a level that feels like a Scorsese script, except the bullets and the bags of cocaine were very real. The documentary, directed by Tiller Russell, pulls no punches. It relies on internal affairs recordings and raw interviews that make you wonder how anyone survived that era.

The 75th Precinct Was a Pressure Cooker

Context is everything. You can't understand why these guys flipped without understanding East New York in 1982. It was the murder capital of the country. Chaos. The precinct was understaffed, overwhelmed, and essentially abandoned by the city's upper brass.

Dowd started out like anyone else. He wanted to do the job. But then he saw the money. He saw the drug dealers making more in an hour than he made in a month. He felt like a sucker for being honest. So, he stopped being honest. He started by taking $200 from a dealer to look the other way. By the end, he was pulling in $8,000 a week protecting the very people he was supposed to put in handcuffs.

It wasn't just Dowd, though. That's the part The 75 makes so clear—the rot was systemic. It’s easy to point at one "monster" and feel better about the system. It’s much harder to look at a precinct where dozens of officers knew, or participated, or simply looked at the floor while bags of cash moved through the locker room.

How the "Los Bravos" Gang Changed Everything

The documentary introduces us to Adam Diaz, the leader of a massive drug ring called Los Bravos. This is where the story shifts from "lazy cops taking bribes" to "cops acting as a private security force for a cartel." Dowd wasn't just ignoring Diaz; he was actively scouting for him.

He’d use his lights and sirens to clear a path for drug shipments. Think about that for a second. A taxpayer-funded vehicle, intended for public safety, was the lead escort for kilos of cocaine.

Kenny Eurell, Dowd's partner, provides the moral (or amoral) anchor for the film. He’s the one who eventually helped bring the whole thing down. His perspective is jarring because he isn't a "hero" whistleblower in the traditional sense. He was a guy caught in a trap who saw the walls closing in. The tension between Dowd's total lack of remorse and Eurell's pragmatism is what makes the documentary feel so alive. It's a study in survival.

What Most People Get Wrong About Michael Dowd

If you watch the interviews, Dowd is oddly likable. He’s got that classic New York grit. He’s funny. He’s sharp.

But you have to look past the charm.

A common misconception is that Dowd was a "Robin Hood" type or just a product of his environment. While the environment was definitely toxic, Dowd was a predator. He would rob other drug dealers at gunpoint while wearing his uniform. He’d break into "stash houses" based on tips he got from rival gangs. He was essentially a high-end stick-up kid with a badge and a gun.

The Mollen Commission, which investigated the NYPD in the 90s, used Dowd as the poster child for what happens when oversight fails completely. Their 1994 report is a sobering read. It describes a culture where "the blue wall of silence" wasn't just about loyalty; it was about survival. If you talked, you were dead. Maybe not literally, but your career was over, and you’d never have backup in a dark alley again.

💡 You might also like: Starman David Bowie Lyrics: What Most People Get Wrong About the Alien on the Radio

The Mollen Commission Findings

  1. Corruption wasn't just for profit anymore; it was often for the "thrill."
  2. Supervisors were often willfully blind to avoid "bad stats."
  3. The recruitment process was failing to weed out high-risk personalities.

Why The 75 Still Matters Today

We live in an era of body cams and instant social media accountability. Looking back at The 75, it feels like a prehistoric age. There were no cell phone cameras. There was no GPS on the cars. If a cop decided to drive to Long Island in the middle of his shift to pick up a bribe—which Dowd did—nobody knew.

The film serves as a massive warning about "dark zones" in policing. When a precinct becomes an island, the inhabitants start making their own laws. It’s a lesson in the necessity of external oversight. You cannot expect a group of people, under extreme stress and surrounded by immense wealth, to police themselves indefinitely without any outside "eyes."

The Legacy of the "Seven-Five"

The precinct still exists, obviously, but it’s a different world. Sorta. The ghost of Dowd still hangs over the NYPD. Whenever a new corruption scandal breaks, the 75th is the benchmark. People ask: "Is it as bad as Dowd?"

Usually, the answer is no. Dowd was a 1-of-1.

The documentary doesn’t just show the crimes; it shows the aftermath. It shows the shattered families and the way the community lost all faith in the people who were supposed to protect them. That trust takes decades to rebuild. In some parts of Brooklyn, it still hasn't been rebuilt.

Reality vs. Hollywood

If you’re a fan of The Wire or Training Day, you’ll see the DNA of those shows here. But The 75 is scarier because there is no "cool" cinematic lighting. It’s grainy surveillance footage. It’s the sound of Dowd’s voice on a wiretap, sounding bored while he discusses felony crimes.

One of the most chilling parts is the interview with Walter Yurkiw. He was another officer involved, and his "art" (he’s a photographer now) reflects the chaos of that time. He speaks about the job with a sort of shell-shocked detachment. It reminds you that these weren't just "bad guys"; they were people who got consumed by a very specific, very dangerous subculture.

Key Players to Remember

  • Michael Dowd: The ringleader. Served over 12 years in prison.
  • Kenny Eurell: The partner who turned. His testimony was the final nail.
  • Adam Diaz: The kingpin. He actually seemed to respect Dowd, in a weird way.
  • Joe Trimboli: The investigator who spent years trying to catch Dowd while his own department fought him. He’s the unsung hero of the story.

Actionable Insights for True Crime Fans

If you've watched the doc and want to go deeper, don't just stop at the credits. There's a lot of primary source material that adds layers to the story.

  • Read the Mollen Commission Report: It’s public record. It provides the dry, academic context to Dowd’s wild stories. It’s fascinating to see how the "official" version matches up with the documentary.
  • Listen to "The City" Podcast: There are several investigative podcasts that cover New York in the 80s and 90s. They give you the "vibe" of the city that pushed these cops over the edge.
  • Look into Joe Trimboli: His story is arguably more interesting than Dowd's. Imagine being a "good cop" trying to take down a "bad cop" while your bosses are actively trying to stop you. That’s a level of stress most of us can’t imagine.
  • Check out Kenny Eurell's book: Betrayal gives his side of the story in much more detail than the film allows. It’s a messy, complicated read, but it fills in the gaps regarding the "endgame" and how they finally got caught.

The 75 is a masterpiece of the genre because it refuses to give you an easy out. You don't walk away feeling like the "bad guys" were punished and everything is fine now. You walk away realizing that the line between "officer" and "criminal" is sometimes just a piece of tin pinned to a chest. It's a reminder that power, without absolute transparency, is a recipe for a nightmare.

Watch it for the history, but pay attention to the human psychology. It's a masterclass in how easily a person can justify the unjustifiable.

📖 Related: The Measure of a Man Movie: Why This Coming-of-Age Story Hits Differently Now

To truly grasp the impact of this era, your next step should be researching the "Dirty 30" scandal in Harlem, which happened shortly after. It proves that what happened in the 75th wasn't an isolated incident, but a symptom of a much larger epidemic in urban policing during the crack era. Understanding both cases gives you a complete picture of why New York law enforcement underwent such radical changes in the late 90s.