Henry James was kind of a master at making people uncomfortable. He didn't do it with gore or cheap thrills, but by digging into the messy, awkward parts of how humans actually talk to each other when they want something. If you pick up a copy of The Bostonians Henry James wrote back in the 1880s, you might expect a dusty, polite period piece about tea and corsets. You’d be wrong. It’s actually a jagged, biting, and strangely funny look at a culture war that feels suspiciously like the ones we’re having on social media right now.
The book is basically a tug-of-war over a girl. But not just any girl—Verena Tarrant is a gifted orator with a "mesmeric" quality that makes people listen. On one side, you’ve got Olive Chancellor, a wealthy, intense Boston feminist who wants Verena to be the voice of a movement. On the other, there’s Basil Ransom, a penniless, reactionary veteran from the South who thinks women belong in the home and nowhere else. It’s a fight for Verena's soul, or maybe just her schedule.
What People Get Wrong About the "Boston Marriage"
You can't talk about this book without addressing the elephant in the room: the relationship between Olive and Verena. In the late 19th century, people used the term "Boston Marriage" to describe two women living together independently of men.
🔗 Read more: How to Draw Bluey Family Characters Without Losing the Heeler Magic
James was writing this at a time when the vocabulary for queer identity was still being built. Honestly, Olive’s obsession with Verena isn't just political. It’s deeply personal, possessive, and, to many modern readers, clearly coded as romantic. James’s own sister, Alice James, lived in a "Boston Marriage" with Katherine Loring, so he knew exactly what he was looking at. He captures that specific brand of intense, exclusive intimacy that blurs the lines between mentorship, friendship, and love.
Critics in 1886 were actually pretty weirded out by it. They found the book "unpleasant." Why? Because James refused to make Olive a simple villain or a simple hero. She’s rigid. She’s judgmental. But she’s also genuinely committed to a cause. Basil Ransom, meanwhile, is often charming but holds views that are, frankly, terrifyingly backwards even for his own time. James isn't taking sides in the way we want him to. He’s just showing how ideology can turn people into monsters of possessiveness.
The Bostonians Henry James and the Death of the American Dream
The setting matters. Post-Civil War America was a mess of transition. You had the old-school Southern chivalry (represented by Basil) crashing head-first into the New England "reformer" culture.
Boston in this novel isn't just a city. It’s a character. It’s full of people who want to save the world but can’t seem to manage their own lives. James paints a picture of a society that is obsessed with "causes"—suffrage, temperance, spiritualism—but often forgets the actual human beings involved in those causes.
The Verena Problem
Verena Tarrant is the most frustrating character for many readers. She’s a "vessel." Her father is a total fraud, a "mesmeric" healer who basically sells his daughter's talent to the highest bidder. Verena doesn't really have a personality of her own at the start; she just reflects whatever the person closest to her wants.
Is she a victim? Or is she just young and adaptable?
When Basil starts wooing her, he isn't trying to "free" her. He’s trying to capture her. He wants to shut her up. The tragedy of the book is that both Olive and Basil want to own her voice. Olive wants her to speak for the movement; Basil wants her to never speak in public again. It’s a bleak look at how even "love" can be a form of colonization.
Why the Ending Still Makes Readers Mad
If you’re looking for a "happily ever after," stay away from Henry James. The ending of the novel is famous for its cynicism. As Basil whisks Verena away from a massive speaking engagement at Music Hall—effectively "winning" the battle against Olive—James drops a final, devastating line. He notes that Verena is in tears, and these weren't the last ones she’d shed.
It’s a gut punch.
It suggests that the "romantic" rescue is actually just the beginning of a different kind of confinement. There are no winners. Olive is left humiliated and broken in front of her public, and Verena is heading off into a life with a man who fundamentally dislikes everything she stands for. It’s incredibly dark. It’s also probably very realistic for the time.
How to Actually Read This Book Without Getting Bored
Look, Henry James can be dense. He loves a long sentence. He loves a semicolon more than almost any writer in history. But if you approach The Bostonians Henry James as a satire rather than a dry drama, it works way better.
- Watch the satire: Pay attention to Miss Birdseye. She’s a legendary character—an old, confused activist who has spent her whole life for "the cause" but has become a bit of a joke to the younger generation. James was actually criticized for this because people thought he was mocking real-life reformer Elizabeth Peabody.
- Ignore the "Action": Not much happens in terms of plot. It’s all about the psychological pressure. Think of it like a high-stakes poker game where the currency is influence.
- Focus on the dialogue: Or rather, what people don't say. James is the king of the subtext. When Basil tells Verena she’s "made for love," he’s basically telling her to quit her job.
The Legacy of the 1984 Film
If the book feels too heavy, you might be tempted by the 1984 film adaptation starring Vanessa Redgrave and Christopher Reeve. It’s actually one of the better James adaptations. Redgrave is haunting as Olive. She manages to show the desperation and the nobility of the character at the same time. Christopher Reeve plays Basil with a smug, handsome confidence that makes his regressive views feel even more dangerous because they’re wrapped in such a "heroic" package.
Watching the movie first can actually help you visualize the spaces James describes—those cramped, book-filled Boston parlors and the windy, desolate stretches of Cape Cod where the characters go to hide from their feelings.
Final Takeaways for the Modern Reader
Reading this novel today is a trip. We like to think we’ve moved past these binary conflicts, but the tension between individual desire and political duty is still everywhere.
To get the most out of your experience with the text, start by looking at the 1885 serialized version vs. the final book. You can see how James sharpened his knives. Also, check out the criticism by someone like Irving Howe, who argued that the book is essentially about the "disruption of the sexual balance" in America. It’s a heavy phrase, but it hits the nail on the head.
💡 You might also like: Direct an Animal to Move: The Real Psychology Behind Why They Actually Listen
Actionable Next Steps:
- Compare the "New Woman": If you finish this, read The Portrait of a Lady. It features a different type of Jamesian heroine and helps you understand his obsession with women’s independence.
- Research Elizabeth Peabody: Look into the real-life "Miss Birdseye" to see how James blurred the line between fiction and gossip.
- Visit the Boston Athenæum: If you’re ever in Boston, go to the places mentioned in the book. Standing in those old libraries makes Olive Chancellor’s world feel a lot more real.
- Track the "Voice" Metaphor: As you read, highlight every time someone mentions Verena’s "voice" or "lungs." It becomes clear that she’s viewed as a musical instrument rather than a person.
The Bostonians isn't a comfortable read, and it’s definitely not a "safe" one. It challenges the idea that any side in a culture war has a monopoly on being "good." It shows that people are complicated, selfish, and often driven by needs they don't even understand. That’s exactly why it’s still worth your time over a century later.
---