Tick. Tick. Tick. It’s a sound that usually means time is passing, but when the Doomsday Clock moves, it doesn't measure minutes. It measures how close we are to blowing everything up. Honestly, it’s a bit terrifying when you really sit with it. Since 2023, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists has kept the time at 90 seconds to midnight. That’s the closest we have ever been to global catastrophe in the history of the clock. Not even during the height of the Cuban Missile Crisis or the darkest days of the Cold War were the hands moved this close to the end.
People often think it’s just a PR stunt. It isn't.
The clock is a metaphor, sure, but the data behind it is as real as it gets. When the Science and Security Board meets in Chicago every year, they aren't just guessing based on the vibe of the news cycle. They are looking at nuclear proliferation, climate change, and the terrifying rise of disruptive technologies like AI and bio-threats. In 2026, the world feels remarkably fragile. We’ve seen a shift from "peace through strength" to something much more chaotic and unpredictable.
What 90 Seconds To Midnight Actually Means
The current Doomsday Clock time isn't just about bombs. While the war in Ukraine and the ongoing instability in the Middle East are massive factors, the Bulletin has made it clear that we are facing a "poly-crisis." Basically, everything is happening all at once. The threat of nuclear escalation has returned to the mainstream conversation in a way we haven't seen in decades. It's no longer just a plot point in a 1980s thriller; it's a genuine concern for diplomats in Washington, Moscow, and Beijing.
Rachel Bronson, the CEO of the Bulletin, has been vocal about the fact that we are living in a time of "unprecedented danger." The 90-second mark reflects a world where communication channels between superpowers have essentially broken down. We used to have treaties. We used to have hotlines. Now? We have rhetoric.
💡 You might also like: New Jersey Governor Race: What Most People Get Wrong About the 2025 Election Results
Think about the New START treaty. It’s the last remaining nuclear arms control pact between the U.S. and Russia, and it's basically on life support. When these guardrails fall away, the clock moves forward. It’s a simple, brutal logic. The experts aren't just worried about an intentional launch; they're worried about a mistake. A technical glitch, a misinterpreted radar signal, or a panicked commander could trigger a chain reaction that no one can stop.
The Climate Factor No One Ignores
Climate change is the other big hand on the clock. 2024 and 2025 were some of the hottest years on record, and 2026 is following that same trend. We are seeing the physical reality of a warming planet—megafires, massive flooding, and the slow-motion collapse of agricultural systems. The Bulletin doesn't view this as a separate issue from nuclear war. They see it as a "threat multiplier."
When resources like water and arable land become scarce, nations go to war. It’s that simple. A drought in a sensitive region can lead to a civil war, which can draw in global powers, which can lead to a nuclear standoff. Everything is connected. The Doomsday Clock reflects this interconnectedness.
Why the Clock Doesn't Move Backward Fast Enough
People ask me all the time: "What would it take to move the hands back?"
It would take a miracle. Or, more realistically, it would take a level of international cooperation that we haven't seen in a generation. In 1991, at the end of the Cold War, the clock was set at 17 minutes to midnight. That was the safest the world has ever been, at least according to the Bulletin. We felt a sense of collective relief. There was a belief that the "End of History" had arrived and that liberal democracy and peace were the new default.
We were wrong.
The hands have been creeping forward almost steadily since then. The rise of North Korea as a nuclear power, the collapse of the Iran nuclear deal, and the rapid modernization of China's nuclear arsenal have all pushed the time toward midnight. Then you add in the misinformation era. The Bulletin actually cited "information warfare" as a reason for the current Doomsday Clock setting. When people can’t agree on what is true, they can’t solve problems. If you can't agree that a virus is real or that the climate is changing, how can you possibly coordinate a global response to a nuclear threat?
AI and the New Frontier of Risk
In 2026, we have to talk about Artificial Intelligence. It’s the newest variable in the doomsday equation. The concern isn't "Skynet" waking up and deciding to kill us all—it's much more subtle and dangerous than that. It's about the automation of command and control.
If an AI system is responsible for detecting an incoming missile and recommending a response, and that system operates at speeds faster than human thought, the window for diplomacy vanishes. We are building systems that could potentially make the decision to start a war before a human being even knows there's a problem. This "flash war" scenario is a major reason why the clock stays at 90 seconds. We are outpacing our own ability to govern the tools we create.
The Critics: Is the Clock Still Relevant?
Not everyone buys into the doom. Some critics, like Harvard professor Steven Pinker, have argued that the clock is too pessimistic. They point out that, statistically, we are living in one of the most peaceful eras in human history if you look at the raw numbers of people dying in combat compared to previous centuries. They argue that the Doomsday Clock is a "fear-mongering" device that ignores the massive strides we've made in technology, medicine, and poverty reduction.
There’s some truth there. We are better at a lot of things. But the Bulletin’s counter-argument is that it only takes one bad day to undo all of that progress. A single nuclear exchange would kill more people in an afternoon than have died in all the wars of the last fifty years combined. The clock isn't a measure of how life is going for the average person; it's a measure of the probability of a "civilization-ending event."
It’s a different kind of math.
Real Evidence of Global Instability
Look at the numbers.
Global military spending hit an all-time high of over $2.4 trillion recently.
Russia has officially suspended its participation in major arms control treaties.
North Korea has increased its frequency of missile tests.
The U.S. is in the middle of a $1.5 trillion "modernization" of its nuclear triad.
These aren't just headlines; they are the gears inside the clock. When you see nations pouring that much money into weapons they hope they never use, it's a sign that trust has evaporated.
And trust is the only thing that keeps the hands from moving to midnight.
The "Human Factor" and What We Can Do
It feels heavy. I get it. Reading about the Doomsday Clock can make you want to just crawl into bed and stay there. But the scientists who set the clock don't do it to make us despair. They do it to wake us up. The clock is meant to be a call to action, not a funeral march.
In 2026, the most important thing we can do is demand a return to diplomacy. It sounds boring. It sounds like something for people in suits in Geneva. But diplomacy is the only thing that has ever moved the hands of the clock back. We need new treaties for the digital age. We need "no-first-use" policies. We need to treat climate change like the existential security threat it actually is, rather than a political football.
Actionable Steps to Counter the Countdown
If you want to help move those hands back, you have to look at the pressure points.
- Pressure your representatives on arms control. Most people don't think about nuclear policy when they vote, but it's the most important issue on the ballot. Support candidates who prioritize treaty-making over arms races.
- Support independent journalism. The "infodemic" is real. Finding and sharing factual, science-based information helps lower the "information warfare" risk that the Bulletin is so worried about.
- Local climate action. It feels small, but reducing the "threat multiplier" of resource scarcity starts with local sustainability. Every bit of resilience we build into our food and water systems makes the world a little less volatile.
- Demand AI ethics. We need to be loud about keeping "humans in the loop" for all lethal autonomous systems. Technology should serve us, not decide our fate.
The Doomsday Clock is currently at 90 seconds to midnight. It’s the closest we’ve ever been, and it's a sobering reminder that we are living on a knife's edge. But remember, the clock has moved back before. It moved back after the Cold War. It moved back after the atmospheric test ban treaty. The hands are moved by human hands—which means we have the power to turn them the other way.
Stay informed. Stay active. The time is literally what we make of it.
Next Steps for Global Security Awareness
To truly understand the risks we face, you should dive into the official 2024 Science and Security Board Monitor reports issued by the Bulletin. These documents provide the raw data on nuclear "near misses" and the specific technological thresholds we are approaching. Additionally, tracking the status of the New START Treaty negotiations is crucial, as the expiration of this agreement without a replacement would almost certainly push the clock even closer to midnight. Focus on supporting organizations like the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons (ICAN), which provide frameworks for civil society to engage with these high-level security issues.