You’ve probably seen it on a necklace, a church banner, or maybe a bumper sticker. It’s a large central cross with four smaller ones tucked into the corners. It looks ancient. It looks holy. But lately, you might have seen it somewhere else—on a shield at a protest or tattooed on the arm of someone shouting slogans that have nothing to do with the Bible. This is the messy reality of the Jerusalem cross and white supremacy, a collision of medieval history and modern radicalization that has historians and religious leaders deeply concerned.
Symbols are slippery things. They don’t stay put. One century, a symbol represents the "Five Wounds of Christ." The next, it’s being flyposted on a recruitment flyer for a fringe group.
Honestly, the Jerusalem cross is a victim of "crusader chic." It’s a specific brand of aesthetic that far-right groups use to feel like they are part of a grand, historical lineage. They want to believe they are modern-day knights defending "Western Civilization." But if you actually look at the history, the connection is pretty flimsy. Most of these guys couldn't tell you the difference between the First Crusade and a garage sale.
Why the Far-Right Loves Medieval Branding
Why this specific cross? Why now? Basically, it’s about the "Crusader" mythos. White supremacist groups, particularly those within the "Alt-Right" or "Identitarian" movements, have spent the last decade obsessed with the Middle Ages. They view the Crusades not as a complex series of religious and political wars, but as a binary struggle: White Christian Europe versus the Islamic East.
It’s a fantasy.
💡 You might also like: Wait, did my ballot actually count? How to check to see if my vote was counted without losing your mind
The Jerusalem cross—also known as the Crusaders' cross—dates back to the 11th century. It was the coat of arms for the Kingdom of Jerusalem. To a modern white nationalist, that symbol represents a time when "Europeans" took back "their" land. They ignore the fact that the Crusaders also massacred Eastern Orthodox Christians and that the concept of "white identity" didn't even exist in 1099. People then identified by their faith or their lord, not their skin color.
Groups like the Knights Templar International (which is not actually a real knightly order) or various "Shield Wall" organizations use the Jerusalem cross to signal a militant, "traditional" masculinity. It’s a shortcut to authority. If you put a 900-year-old symbol on your flag, you look like you have roots. You look established. You don't look like a guy who just spent four hours arguing on a message board.
The Problem of Reclaiming Symbols
How do you distinguish between a devout Catholic wearing a Jerusalem cross and someone using it as a hate symbol? It’s hard. It’s really hard.
Context is everything.
The Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) track these things carefully. Generally, the Jerusalem cross isn't classified as a "hate symbol" in the same way the swastika or the Valknot is. It’s still widely used by the Franciscan Order, who are the official custodians of the holy sites in Jerusalem. If you see it in a cathedral, it’s a symbol of faith. If you see it next to a "14/88" slogan or a "Remove Kebab" meme, you know exactly what it’s doing there.
Co-option is a tactical move. By using symbols that are mainstream or religious, extremists create "plausible deniability." If they get called out, they can claim they are just "proud of their Christian heritage." It makes it much harder for social media platforms to moderate their content. It's a "dog whistle"—inaudible to most, but crystal clear to the target audience.
The Historical Reality vs. The Extremist Myth
Let’s get nerdy for a second. The Jerusalem cross is technically a cross-potent with four crosslets.
Historians like Dr. Dan Jones or Dr. Susanna Throop have pointed out that the Crusades were never about "white supremacy." They were about power, land, and a very specific medieval view of salvation. The people who fought in them were French, Norman, German, and Italian, and they often fought each other just as much as they fought anyone else.
The white supremacist narrative relies on a "clash of civilizations" model that just doesn't hold up under scrutiny. In the Kingdom of Jerusalem, there was actually a high level of cultural exchange. You had Frankish knights wearing local silks, eating local food, and even negotiating complex treaties with Muslim neighbors. It wasn't the "total war" for racial purity that modern extremists imagine.
👉 See also: P-22 Mountain Lion: Why the Hollywood Cat Changed Everything We Know About Urban Wildlife
- The Myth: The Jerusalem cross represents a unified white European front.
- The Fact: The Kingdom of Jerusalem was a fragile, multilingual, and ethnically diverse feudal state.
- The Myth: It’s a symbol of "Western" superiority.
- The Fact: It was a religious symbol representing the spread of the Gospel to the four corners of the world.
When the Jerusalem cross and white supremacy are linked, it’s usually because of "The Great Replacement" theory. This is the paranoid idea that white populations are being systematically replaced. Extremists use the Jerusalem cross to say, "We defended our borders once, and we will do it again." It’s an appeal to a violent past to justify a violent future.
Radicalization in the Digital Age
Social media has accelerated this. On platforms like Telegram or X (formerly Twitter), you’ll find "Trad" (Traditionalist) accounts that post pictures of cathedrals, statues, and crusader crosses. It looks harmless at first. It’s "aesthetic." But if you follow the breadcrumbs, the content often shifts from "look at this pretty architecture" to "we need to defend our blood and soil."
This is how the Jerusalem cross gets pulled into the orbit of hate. It’s part of a "lifestyle brand" for the far-right. They want to make extremism look beautiful, ancient, and righteous. They want to make it look like a crusade.
What Real Experts Say About the Co-option
The Church isn't happy about this.
The Episcopal Church and various Catholic organizations have issued statements regarding the use of Christian imagery by white nationalist groups. They’ve been pretty clear: you can’t use the cross to preach hate. But the Church doesn't own the "copyright" on the Jerusalem cross. It’s in the public domain of history.
Kimberly Wagner, a professor at Princeton Theological Seminary, has written about how the "crusader" mindset is being revived in American politics. She argues that when we use this language, we aren't just talking about history; we are invoking a logic of "us versus them." This logic is exactly what white supremacist groups thrive on. They need an enemy. The Jerusalem cross provides the visual armor for that conflict.
We also have to talk about the "Pew to Populism" pipeline. Some researchers have noticed that individuals who feel alienated from modern, secular society are drawn to the "certainty" of medieval symbols. The Jerusalem cross feels solid. It feels like it belongs to a time when things were "simple." For someone looking for a sense of belonging, that can be a very powerful lure—even if the history behind it is totally distorted.
How to Spot the Misuse
If you are trying to figure out if you're looking at a religious symbol or a political one, look at the "packaging."
Extremist use of the Jerusalem cross usually comes with other markers. Are there references to "Deus Vult" (God wills it)? Is it paired with "Pepe the Frog" or other internet memes? Is it being used to promote "Western Chauvinism"?
- Religious Use: Focuses on the Passion of Christ, pilgrimage to the Holy Land, or charitable works (like the Knights of the Holy Sepulchre).
- Extremist Use: Focuses on "reconquest," stopping "invaders," and maintaining "racial purity."
It’s a tragedy, honestly. A symbol that for centuries represented a deep, spiritual connection to a specific city and a specific faith is being turned into a logo for tribalism. But this isn't the first time symbols have been hijacked, and it won't be the last. The swastika was a symbol of peace for thousands of years before the Nazis ruined it for everyone. The Jerusalem cross isn't at that point yet, but the "crusader chic" trend is pushing it dangerously close.
🔗 Read more: What Really Happened With the JFK Files: The Truth About the Latest Releases
Navigating the Conversation
So, what do you do if you see it?
Don't assume everyone wearing a Jerusalem cross is a white supremacist. That’s step one. You’d be accusing a lot of grandma-types and pilgrims of being radicals. But don't ignore it either, especially in political spaces.
If you're a designer or a content creator, be aware of the "crusader" aesthetic. Understand that these symbols carry weight. When we use them without knowing their history—or their modern misuse—we can accidentally signal things we don't intend to.
Education is the only real fix here. We need to talk about what the Crusades actually were—messy, violent, and deeply complicated—rather than letting extremists tell a fairy tale about "white knights."
Practical Next Steps
- Verify the Source: If you see the Jerusalem cross on a website or social media profile, check the "About" section. Does it talk about theology, or does it talk about "heritage" and "demographics"?
- Study the History: Read actual historians. Books like The Crusades: The Authoritative History by Thomas Asbridge provide a much-needed reality check to the "white supremacy" narrative.
- Report Hate Speech: If you see the cross being used in conjunction with actual threats or dehumanizing language, use the reporting tools on the platform. Symbols themselves might not be banned, but the context around them often violates terms of service.
- Reclaim the Narrative: If you value the symbol for its religious or historical meaning, use it correctly. Share the real history. Don't let the loudest, most hateful voices define what a thousand-year-old cross means.
The Jerusalem cross and white supremacy is a modern problem, but the solution is ancient: truth. By looking at the facts and refusing to let symbols be flattened into political weapons, we take away the power that extremists try to steal from the past.