It wasn't exactly a suspense thriller. Most people watching C-SPAN on January 22, 2021, knew how the Lloyd Austin confirmation vote was going to end before the first "yea" was even uttered. But if you think it was just a simple rubber-stamp for President Biden’s first Pentagon chief, you’re missing the actual drama that nearly derailed the whole thing weeks earlier.
The final tally was a crushing 93-2. That’s about as close to a consensus as you get in a town that argues over the color of the sky. But the lopsided score hides a massive, messy debate about whether a career general should even be allowed to run the building he just left.
Honestly, it was kinda touch-and-go for a minute.
The Seven-Year Itch and the Waiver War
Before we even got to the Lloyd Austin confirmation vote, there was the "waiver problem." You’ve probably heard of the National Security Act of 1947. Basically, it says you have to be out of uniform for at least seven years before you can be Secretary of Defense. The logic is simple: we want civilians, not generals, calling the shots at the top.
Austin had only been retired for four years.
This created a huge headache. Why? Because Congress had just granted a waiver for Jim Mattis four years prior. Lawmakers on both sides were starting to feel like the "exception" was becoming the "rule."
- The House Vote: 326–78.
- The Senate Waiver Vote: 69–27.
Notice the difference? That 69-27 vote for the waiver was much tighter than the final 93-2 confirmation. Senators like Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand—who usually support Democratic nominees—were openly "meh" about the whole thing because of the civil-military balance. They eventually came around, but they weren't happy about it.
Why the Lloyd Austin Confirmation Vote Went So Smoothly (Eventually)
So, how do you go from a shaky waiver debate to a 93-2 landslide?
Austin is a pro. He spent 41 years in the Army. He led the 3rd Infantry Division into Baghdad. He ran CENTCOM. During his hearing on January 19, he did exactly what he needed to do: he promised to be a "civilian."
"I know that being a member of the president’s Cabinet... requires a different perspective and unique duties from a career in uniform," he told the committee.
That was the magic phrase. He basically told the Senate, "I’m taking off the camo and putting on the suit, and I know the difference."
👉 See also: Operation Southern Spear: What Really Happened with the Caribbean Oil Blockade
It also helped that he was making history. You can't ignore the weight of him becoming the first Black Secretary of Defense. For many in the room, that milestone outweighed the technicality of the seven-year rule.
Who were the two holdouts?
In a town of 100 egos, there are always a couple of "no" votes. For the Lloyd Austin confirmation vote, the dissenters were:
- Josh Hawley (R-MO): He was voting "no" on almost all of Biden's early nominees.
- Mike Lee (R-UT): He cited concerns over the waiver and the erosion of civilian control.
Surprisingly, even the "hawks" who usually grill nominees—think Tom Cotton or Ted Cruz—voted "yea." They might have hated Biden's policies, but they respected the General's silver stars.
What He Inherited Post-Vote
Once the Lloyd Austin confirmation vote was in the books, the honeymoon ended instantly. He didn't get to celebrate. He walked into a Pentagon that was still reeling from the January 6th Capitol riot and a massive internal debate about extremism in the ranks.
His first big move? A "stand-down" to talk about extremism.
Then came the COVID-19 vaccine mandates. Then the chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan.
People often forget that the confirmation is the easy part. It's the 93 people who voted for you calling you back to testify three months later to yell at you about a budget cut that really tests your patience.
✨ Don't miss: The Victims of Pan Am Flight 103: Why We Still Can’t Forget Them
Actionable Insights: Why This Matters for the Future
If you're tracking how the Pentagon operates, the Lloyd Austin confirmation vote set a precedent we’re going to be dealing with for decades. Here is what you should keep an eye on:
- The Waiver Precedent: Don't be surprised if the next president tries for a third waiver. The "seven-year rule" is basically a suggestion at this point.
- The "Industry Tie" Factor: Austin's time on the board of Raytheon was a major talking point. Expect future nominees to face even more scrutiny regarding their stock portfolios and board seats.
- Civilian Control: Watch the "undersecretaries." If the SecDef is a former general, the civilian "deputies" in the building become ten times more important for maintaining balance.
The vote was a landslide, but the debate it sparked about who should lead the military is far from over.
Next Steps for Readers: To get a full picture of how this transition shaped current policy, you should look into the official Senate Armed Services Committee hearing transcripts from January 19, 2021. Pay close attention to the questions regarding the "Pacific Deterrence Initiative"—it shows exactly where Austin’s head was at regarding China long before the current headlines hit. You can also track the Roll Call Vote No. 5 in the 117th Congress records to see exactly how your specific state's senators landed on the final decision.