Photographs of the late Princess of Wales aren't exactly in short supply. You've seen them a thousand times. The shy glances from under her fringe, the broad smiles during hospital visits, and those candid shots from the back of a black car. But if you really look at the sheer volume of imagery from 1981 to 1997, a pattern emerges. The Princess Diana side profile became a sort of visual shorthand for her entire narrative.
It wasn’t just a random camera angle. It was the "look."
👉 See also: Gwyneth Paltrow: What Most People Get Wrong
In the early eighties, the press dubbed her "Shy Di." That nickname didn't come from nowhere. It was born from her habit of dipping her chin and looking up through her lashes. This meant that, more often than not, the cameras caught her in profile or semi-profile. This specific perspective highlighted the bridge of her nose—a feature she was reportedly self-conscious about—but it also lent her an air of Grecian stateliness that the royal family's more traditional, stiff portraits often missed.
The geometry of a royal icon
When we talk about the Princess Diana side profile, we’re talking about more than just bone structure. We’re talking about the evolution of a woman’s confidence.
Lord Snowdon’s 1981 portraits are a great starting point. He was a master of shadow. In those early engagement photos, he often positioned Diana so the light hit the side of her face, leaving the rest in a soft, romantic gloom. It made her look like a character from a Jane Austen novel. Innocent. Untouched.
Then everything changed.
By the time we get to the nineties, the profile shots aren't about shyness anymore. They're about power. Think about the iconic Mario Testino shoot for Vanity Fair in 1997, just months before her death. Testino didn't want a "Princess." He wanted Diana. He had her lounge on couches, laughing, with her hair pushed back. In those shots, her side profile isn't a shield; it's a statement.
The sharp line of her jaw and the way she held her head showed a woman who had finally stopped hiding. Honestly, the difference between the 1981 "shy" profile and the 1997 "liberated" profile is basically the entire story of her life in two frames.
Why photographers loved the angle
Standard royal photography used to be pretty boring. It was all about the "full frontal" gaze—direct, unblinking, and somewhat impersonal. Diana broke that.
🔗 Read more: Is Cory Booker Still Dating Rosario Dawson? What Really Happened
Photographers like Patrick Demarchelier, who became the first non-British official royal photographer, realized that Diana’s face worked differently. She had a very expressive side profile. While a front-facing photo might look formal, a profile shot captured her listening. It captured her contemplating.
- The Nose: Diana famously had a strong, aristocratic nose. In an era of cookie-cutter Hollywood perfection, her profile was distinctive.
- The Neckline: She had a long, elegant neck that side-angled shots accentuated, especially when she wore the Spencer tiara or those famous choker necklaces.
- The Hair: Whether it was the feathered flick of the 80s or the sleek crop of the 90s, the side view showed the texture and volume that defined her "look."
The "Diving Board" and the silhouette of loneliness
If you want to understand the emotional weight of a side profile, look at the photo of Diana on the diving board of the Jonikal in 1997.
She’s sitting at the very edge of the board, legs dangling over the Mediterranean. The camera is far away, capturing her from the side. You can’t see the details of her face, just the silhouette of her profile against the vast blue of the sea. It’s arguably one of the most famous photos ever taken of her.
Why? Because the profile creates a sense of voyeurism. We are looking at her, but she isn't looking at us. She’s lost in her own world. It captures the "isolated princess" trope better than any staged portrait ever could.
The media leaned into this. Hard.
Every time she looked away, every time a paparazzi caught her staring out a window in profile, it fed the narrative of the "sad, lonely royal." Sometimes it was true; sometimes it was just a clever crop by an editor who knew that a side profile sells more papers than a smiling face.
Beauty standards and the "Diana Nose"
Kinda strange to think about now, but Diana’s profile actually changed what people thought was "pretty" in the late 20th century.
Before her, the "English Rose" was often depicted with very soft, snub-nosed features. Diana was different. She was tall, athletic, and had a prominent profile. Plastic surgeons in the 80s and 90s reported a massive spike in women wanting a "stronger" nose or a more defined jawline, citing the Princess as the blueprint.
She proved that you didn't need a tiny, upturned nose to be the most beautiful woman in the world. Her profile was unapologetic.
Breaking down the visual elements
If you're trying to analyze why certain shots of her rank higher in the public's memory, it usually comes down to three things:
- Light Direction: Backlighting her profile created a "halo" effect with her blonde hair, making her look almost angelic.
- The "Gaze": Diana rarely looked at the horizon. She usually looked slightly down or slightly up. This created a curve in the neck that felt more "human" than a straight-backed royal pose.
- The Wardrobe: High collars or massive "Dynasty" shoulder pads often framed her head in profile, making her look like a cameo on a piece of jewelry.
What we can learn from her imagery today
Honestly, the Princess Diana side profile is a masterclass in personal branding, even if it was largely accidental at first. She learned how to use her features to communicate a mood without saying a single word.
If she wanted to seem vulnerable, she gave the cameras her "Shy Di" profile. If she wanted to seem untouchable, she lifted her chin and gave them the "Statuesque" profile.
It’s about more than just being "photogenic." It’s about the narrative of the image.
The next time you see a photo of her, check the angle. Chances are, if it’s one of the "greats," it’s not a straight-on shot. It’s a side view. It’s a moment where she’s caught between being a public icon and a private person.
Take these steps to appreciate the nuance of royal portraiture:
- Compare the 1981 Lord Snowdon engagement portraits with the 1997 Mario Testino Vanity Fair series to see the shift in head tilt and chin height.
- Look for the "unseen" side—most people don't realize that Diana had a "preferred" side for photos, usually her left, which she felt was more flattering.
- Observe how modern royals, like the Princess of Wales (Kate) or Meghan Markle, often use similar side-profile poses during somber events like Remembrance Sunday to evoke that same sense of "contemplative dignity" that Diana pioneered.