Politics in D.C. usually feels like a scripted play, but every now and then, the actors go off-book. That’s exactly what happened during the marathon session leading up to the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA). For months, the "Big Beautiful Bill" was the talk of every cable news cycle—a sprawling, $3.3 trillion legislative behemoth designed to be the crown jewel of President Trump’s second-term agenda.
It had everything: permanent tax cuts, massive border wall funding, and even money for a "Golden Dome" missile defense system. But when the dust settled on July 1, 2025, the Senate tally was a razor-thin 50-50. Vice President JD Vance had to step in to break the tie.
Why was it so close? Because three specific Republican senators decided to say "no."
The Defectors: Why They Broke Ranks
Most people assumed the GOP would march in lockstep. Trump had been very clear on Truth Social, essentially telling his party to get on board or get out of the way. Yet, three names flashed red on the voting board: Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Susan Collins of Maine, and Rand Paul of Kentucky.
They weren't all angry about the same things. It wasn't some organized mutiny. Honestly, their reasons were as different as their home states.
Thom Tillis and the Medicaid Cliff
Senator Thom Tillis was probably the biggest surprise for some, but if you listened to his floor speech on the Sunday before the vote, the writing was on the wall. He was worried about the nearly $1 trillion in cuts to Medicaid.
Tillis argued that these cuts would be a "death knell" for rural hospitals in North Carolina. He wasn't wrong to be concerned. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) had released a report just days earlier suggesting that up to 12 million people could lose coverage. Tillis essentially gambled his career on this; Trump immediately threatened to find a primary challenger for him, calling him "worse than Rand 'Fauci' Paul." Tillis actually announced his retirement shortly after, citing the "endangered species" of independent thinking in Washington.
Susan Collins: Maine’s Perpetual Holdout
Susan Collins is no stranger to being the deciding vote. Like Tillis, her sticking point was Medicaid. About 400,000 people in Maine rely on the program, and she wasn't convinced the "rural hospital stabilization fund" included in the bill was enough to patch the holes the bill created.
🔗 Read more: William J Hochul Jr: Why the Former US Attorney Still Matters in 2026
She liked the tax cuts. She’s said that repeatedly. But she couldn't stomach the "harmful impact" on low-income families and nursing homes. She even tried to double the hospital fund from $25 billion to $50 billion by taxing people making over $25 million a year, but that amendment got crushed.
Rand Paul and the "Fiscal Sanity" Argument
Then there's Rand Paul. He didn't care about the Medicaid cuts in the same way Collins did. For him, it was all about the price tag.
Paul is a deficit hawk to his core. He looked at the bill—which the CBO said would add nearly $4 trillion to the national debt—and saw a disaster. He actually met with JD Vance and offered to vote "yes" if the bill slashed the debt ceiling by 90%. When the administration said no, Paul walked. He famously dubbed it the "Big Not-So-Beautiful Bill" right after the vote.
What was actually in the "Big Beautiful Bill"?
To understand why these three risked the wrath of the White House, you have to look at the sheer scale of the legislation. It wasn't just a tax bill. It was a 887-page rewrite of the American social contract.
- Permanent Tax Cuts: It made the 2017 tax rates permanent, which were originally set to expire at the end of 2025.
- The "Trump Accounts": A new type of tax-deferred savings account for parents to use for their children.
- Immigration: $46 billion specifically for the U.S.-Mexico border wall and $45 billion for migrant detention beds.
- Defense: Massive investments in ship building and the "Golden Dome" missile shield.
But the "pay-fors" are what caused the drama. To fund the tax breaks, the bill slashed $930 billion from Medicaid and $300 billion from the Affordable Care Act. It also added strict work requirements for SNAP (food stamps), requiring able-bodied adults to work 80 hours a month to keep their benefits.
📖 Related: Toledo Blade Obituaries Past 3 Days: How to Find Recent Notices and Memorials
The Fallout: A Party Divided?
The drama didn't end with the Senate vote. Because the Senate version had been tweaked to win over Lisa Murkowski (who wanted food stamp protections for Alaska), the bill had to go back to the House.
The House vote on July 3 was just as chaotic. Two House Republicans, Thomas Massie and Brian Fitzpatrick, joined the Democrats in opposition. Massie, much like Rand Paul, hated the spending. Fitzpatrick, a moderate from Pennsylvania, was worried about the healthcare implications.
Despite the defectors, the bill passed 218-214. President Trump signed it on July 4, 2025, calling it a "Declaration of Economic Independence."
The "Musk Factor"
One weird side note: Elon Musk actually tried to kill the bill at the last second. He was worried about the removal of clean energy incentives that were part of the previous administration's climate policies. He even threatened to fund primary challenges against anyone who voted for it. It didn't work, but it added a bizarre "tech-billionaire-vs-populist-president" layer to the whole ordeal.
Why This Vote Still Matters in 2026
We're now seeing the real-world effects of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. In 2026, the first wave of Medicaid "redeterminations" is starting. States are now required to look back three months to verify work requirements.
For the Republican party, the "no" votes from Tillis, Collins, and Paul created a roadmap for internal dissent. It showed that even with a unified government, the "debt vs. social safety net" argument is far from settled.
✨ Don't miss: Highway 99 Crash Today: Why This Stretch of Road Stays So Dangerous
What you should watch next:
- Monitor Your Local Healthcare: If you live in a state that didn't expand Medicaid, keep an eye on your local rural hospitals. The stabilization fund is being administered by CMS now, and the first round of applications is due this spring.
- Check Your Tax Withholding: Since the 2017 cuts are now permanent, you don't have to worry about the "tax cliff" that was supposed to happen this year, but the new "Trump Accounts" rules go into effect for the 2026 tax season.
- The 2026 Midterms: Watch the primary races in North Carolina. With Tillis retiring, that seat is a wide-open battlefield for the "MAGA" vs. "Traditionalist" wings of the party.
The Big Beautiful Bill was a win for the administration, but the three "no" votes in the Senate proved that even a "beautiful" bill has its ugly side for those worried about the deficit or the most vulnerable.