Everyone remembers Neil Armstrong. "One small step," and all that. But for a good few years in the 1960s, if you’d asked a random person on the street who was going to win the space race, they probably would have bet their house on the Kremlin. The USSR was hitting every milestone first. First satellite? Sputnik, 1957. First man in space? Gagarin, 1961. First woman? Tereshkova, 1963. First spacewalk? Leonov, 1965. By the time 1966 rolled around, it felt like a USSR landing on the moon was a foregone conclusion, a mere matter of paperwork and physics.
But it never happened. At least, not with people inside the ship.
While the Americans were broadcasting the Apollo missions in high-definition glory, the Soviet lunar program was rotting from the inside, plagued by internal backstabbing, a lack of funding, and a rocket that kept exploding. People often think the Soviets just gave up once Kennedy made his famous speech, but that’s not true. They were trying. Hard. They just couldn't get their "Moon God," the N1 rocket, to cooperate.
The N1 Rocket: A 30-Engine Nightmare
If you want to understand why the USSR landing on the moon remained a dream, you have to look at the N1. This thing was a beast. It stood over 100 meters tall. It was meant to be the Soviet answer to the Saturn V, the massive rocket that powered the Apollo missions. But there was a fundamental difference in how they were built.
The Saturn V used five massive, incredibly powerful F-1 engines. The Soviets? They couldn't build engines that big at the time. Instead, they took 30 smaller NK-15 engines and shoved them all into the base of the first stage.
Thirty engines.
Imagine trying to get 30 different jazz musicians to play the exact same note at the exact same millisecond without a rehearsal. That’s what the plumbing for the N1 was like. If one engine vibrated too much, it shook the plumbing of the engine next to it. If one pipe leaked, the whole thing became a giant firework.
It failed four times. Every single launch attempt ended in a crash or an explosion. The most famous failure happened in July 1969—just weeks before Apollo 11—when the N1 collapsed back onto the launchpad. It was one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in human history. It basically leveled the entire launch complex at Baikonur.
Korolev vs. Chelomey: The Feud That Killed the Dream
History is usually driven by big ideas, but sometimes it’s just driven by two guys who really, really hate each other. In the Soviet Union, the space program wasn't one unified agency like NASA. It was a collection of "Design Bureaus" run by powerful, ego-driven engineers who competed for the same scraps of Kremlin funding.
The two main players were Sergei Korolev, the "Chief Designer" who launched Sputnik, and Vladimir Chelomey.
They disagreed on everything. Korolev wanted to use non-toxic fuels; Chelomey wanted to use "devil's venom" (hypergolic propellants that were efficient but incredibly poisonous). Because they couldn't agree, the Soviet government split the budget. Instead of focusing on one moon rocket, they were trying to develop three different ones at the same time.
Honestly, it was a mess.
While NASA was getting $25 billion and a clear mandate from the White House, the Soviet engineers were busy sabotaging each other’s proposals in backrooms. When Korolev died unexpectedly during a routine surgery in 1966, the program lost its North Star. His successor, Vasily Mishin, just didn't have the political weight to keep the bureaucrats in line.
The Robotic Consolation Prize
Even though a crewed USSR landing on the moon failed, we shouldn't act like they didn't get there at all. They were actually the first to touch the lunar surface.
The Luna 2 probe slammed into the moon in 1959. That was a huge win for them. Later, in 1966, Luna 9 became the first spacecraft to achieve a soft landing and send back photos. These were massive technical achievements. They even successfully sent the Lunokhod rovers—basically remote-controlled space batmobiles—that drove around the lunar surface for months.
They also did something the Americans didn't do until much later: automated sample returns. The Luna 16 mission landed on the moon, drilled into the dirt, packed it into a little capsule, and launched it back to Earth. All without a human ever touching a joystick.
But in the 1960s, robots didn't capture the public imagination like astronauts did. The Soviets knew that. They kept their human lunar program a secret for decades. If you had asked a Soviet official in 1972 if they were trying to reach the moon, they would have lied and said they were only ever interested in space stations. We didn't get the full story of the N1 until the late 1980s during the era of Glasnost.
What the Soviet Lunar Lander Looked Like
The Soviet LK (Lunniy Korabl) was a weird, spindly little thing. Unlike the American Lunar Module, which held two people, the LK was a solo ride. One cosmonaut. One seat.
🔗 Read more: Converting Excel Capital Letter to Lowercase: The Stuff Nobody Actually Tells You
The plan was terrifying. The cosmonaut would have to perform a spacewalk from the main ship to get into the lander. Then, they would descend to the surface alone. If anything went wrong, there was nobody there to help. They didn't even have a docking tunnel like Apollo; they literally had to climb out of one hatch and into another while orbiting the moon.
Why a USSR Landing on the Moon Matters Now
Why are we still talking about this? Because we're in a new space race.
Today, the players are different—it’s the US, China, and private companies like SpaceX—but the lessons from the Soviet failure are still incredibly relevant.
- Centralization works: NASA succeeded because it had a single goal and a unified structure. The Soviet "design bureau" competition led to wasted resources.
- Testing is non-negotiable: The N1 engines were never test-fired together on the ground. They just put them on the rocket and hoped for the best. Modern engineering (and SpaceX’s iterative testing) shows that you have to be willing to break things on the ground before you send them to the stars.
- Politics is the fuel: The moment the US won the race, the Soviet government lost interest in funding a "second place" landing. Without political will, the science stops.
The dream of a USSR landing on the moon ended officially in 1974 when the N1 program was scrapped and the remaining rockets were cut up for scrap metal. Some of those scraps were actually turned into storage sheds for local villagers.
Moving Forward: How to Track Modern Lunar Missions
If you're interested in how the "second space race" is playing out, don't just look at NASA. The landscape is way more crowded than it was in 1969.
- Follow the Artemis Program: This is NASA's current plan to return humans to the moon. Unlike Apollo, this is about staying there, building a base, and eventually using it as a stepping stone to Mars.
- Monitor the CNSA (China National Space Administration): China is arguably the "new USSR" in this scenario, moving methodically and hitting their marks. Their Chang'e missions have already landed on the far side of the moon—something no one else has done.
- Watch the Starship tests: Elon Musk’s Starship is essentially the modern N1—lots of engines, huge scale—but with the benefit of modern computers to manage the "jazz band" of engines that the Soviets couldn't control.
The history of the Soviet lunar program isn't just a story of failure. It's a reminder that reaching the moon is hard. Really hard. It requires more than just smart engineers; it requires a stable political environment and a lot of luck. Next time you look at the moon, remember that there are pieces of Soviet aluminum sitting up there in the Sea of Tranquility, reminders of a race that was much closer than the history books usually suggest.
👉 See also: Why Every Real Picture of the Moon Looks So Different (and What to Look For)
To get a better sense of the scale of these machines, you should check out the remaining NK-33 engines that were salvaged from the N1 program. Some of them were actually sold to American rocket companies decades later because they were so efficiently designed. It turns out the Soviet engineers were geniuses; they just didn't have the management or the money to make their masterpiece fly.