People love a good mystery. It’s human nature. We get obsessed with the strange, the macabre, and the things that just don't make sense at first glance. For years, the internet has been fixated on the "woman in the jar." It sounds like an urban legend you’d hear around a campfire or some creepy creepypasta written by a bored teenager. But the reality is much more grounded in tragedy and small-town Texas history. We aren't talking about a sci-fi experiment. This is the story of Myra Deshotel, a woman whose remains were kept in a glass container for decades in a rural funeral home.
Honestly, the way this story spread online is a bit of a mess. You’ve probably seen the grainy photos or the TikToks with the spooky music. Most of them get the facts wrong. They act like it was some nefarious secret or a mad scientist's trophy. It wasn’t. It was a bizarre byproduct of poverty, legal limbo, and a funeral director who didn't know what else to do with a body nobody claimed.
💡 You might also like: Why Missouri State of Emergency Declarations Are More Common Than You Think
The Grim Reality of the Myra Deshotel Case
Myra Deshotel died in 1958. That’s where the clock starts on this whole saga. She was a resident of Liberty, Texas, and her passing didn't initially cause a stir. She was poor. She didn't have a massive family fighting over her estate or a pre-paid funeral plan. In the 1950s, especially in rural areas, if a body went unclaimed, things got complicated fast. The local funeral home, Allison Funeral Service, took her in.
Because no one came forward to pay for a burial or a cremation, the funeral director, H.M. Allison, made a choice that seems unthinkable today but had a weird logic back then. He preserved her. Specifically, he placed her in a glass-topped casket or a container that allowed for viewing, often referred to in local lore as "the jar." It wasn't a pickle jar. Think more like a specialized, sealed display.
The goal? He hoped a relative would eventually see her and claim her.
Days turned into months. Months turned into years. Eventually, decades passed. Myra became a local "attraction," though that feels like a gross way to describe a human being's remains. Kids would sneak into the funeral home on dares. It became one of those "did you hear?" stories that defines a small town's identity.
Why This Kept Happening for Decades
You might wonder how the law allowed this. Laws regarding the disposal of human remains were much looser in mid-century Texas than they are now. If a funeral home was stuck with a body, and the county wouldn't provide funds for a "pauper's grave," the remains just stayed there.
It's kinda wild to think about the logistics. Preservation techniques in the 50s were decent, but they weren't "sit in a glass box for 40 years" decent. The body naturally mummified. By the time the story reached national attention in the late 20th century, Myra didn't look like a person who had just passed away. She looked like a relic.
Breaking the Cycle of the Urban Legend
By the 1990s, the world was changing. State regulators and the Texas Funeral Service Commission started tightening the screws on how remains were handled. You couldn't just have a "woman in the jar" in your basement or back room anymore. It was a massive liability and, frankly, an ethical nightmare.
In 1993, the saga finally reached its end. The funeral home was under new management. The state stepped in. Myra Deshotel was finally given a proper, dignified burial in a local cemetery. No more glass. No more dares. Just a grave.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Story
If you search for this today, you’ll find people claiming she was "pickled" or that she was a victim of a crime. Neither is true. Myra died of natural causes—specifically, complications related to a stroke or heart issues, depending on which local record you trust more.
- The "Jar" wasn't a jar. It was a custom-made glass coffin or viewing case.
- It wasn't a secret. Everyone in Liberty knew she was there. It was an open secret that lasted for 35 years.
- There was no "mad scientist." H.M. Allison was just a guy who didn't want to bury someone at his own personal expense without trying to find her family first. He just waited too long.
We have to look at this through the lens of the time. In 1958, the social safety net was basically a spiderweb with giant holes in it. If you were marginalized or poor, you could literally disappear while still being physically present.
The Ethics of the Macabre
The fascination with the woman in the jar says more about us than it does about Myra. Why are we so drawn to these stories? It’s the "freak show" element that survived from the 19th century into the digital age. We want to see the thing that shouldn't exist.
Medical ethics experts often point to cases like this when discussing "consent after death." Myra never consented to be a local curiosity. She didn't sign a waiver. Her body became property of the state and the funeral home by default. This case is actually cited in some mortuary science circles as the primary reason why modern laws require immediate disposition of remains if no claimant is found within a specific window (usually 48 to 72 hours before the state intervenes).
Lessons from the Liberty, Texas Incident
It’s easy to judge the people from the 50s, 60s, and 70s who let this happen. But honestly, look at how we treat these stories now. We turn them into "content." We strip the humanity away and leave only the "jar."
When we talk about Myra Deshotel, we should probably stop using the "woman in the jar" label. It’s dehumanizing. She was a woman who lived a life, likely had friends, and definitely had a history that was erased by the strange circumstances of her death.
Moving Forward: How to Respect These Histories
If you find yourself down a rabbit hole of "unclaimed remains" or "strange funeral histories," there are a few things to keep in mind to stay on the right side of ethics and accuracy.
- Check the sources. If an article doesn't mention Liberty, Texas, or the Allison Funeral Service, it's probably making things up.
- Look for the burial date. A legitimate historical account will mention her 1993 burial. If the story implies she's still "out there," it's fake news.
- Acknowledge the person. Always refer to her by name. Myra Deshotel.
The "woman in the jar" is a ghost story that turned out to be a sad, bureaucratic failure. It’s a reminder that even in death, the poor and the forgotten are often treated as objects rather than people. The fact that it took three and a half decades to give her a piece of earth to call her own is the real tragedy.
If you're ever in Liberty, Texas, you won't find a jar. You’ll find a cemetery. And in that cemetery is a woman who finally got the silence and the privacy she was denied for nearly forty years. That’s the ending the story deserved.
The best way to honor these types of historical footnotes is to stop treating them like entertainment and start treating them like history. Read the local archives. Support efforts that provide burials for the indigent. Most importantly, remember that behind every "weird" internet headline, there is usually a human being who deserved better than a glass case and a nickname.
📖 Related: The Mexican Navy Boat Crash: What the Reports Often Miss
To learn more about how modern mortuary laws have changed since the 1950s, you can look into the Texas Occupational Code, specifically the sections governing the Funeral Service Commission. It’s dry reading, sure, but it explains exactly why a situation like Myra’s can never legally happen again. You can also research the "Indigent Burial Programs" in your own county to see how unclaimed persons are handled today with the dignity they are legally and morally owed.