Top 100 Athletes of All Time: Why Most Rankings Get it Wrong

Top 100 Athletes of All Time: Why Most Rankings Get it Wrong

Putting together a list of the top 100 athletes of all time is basically an invitation for an argument. Honestly, you've probably seen a dozen of these lists, and they always feel a bit... off. One person values raw stats, another cares more about "clutch" moments, and someone else is obsessed with how many trophies are in the cabinet. It's messy.

By January 2026, the debate has only gotten weirder. We’re watching LeBron James still putting up All-Star numbers at 41 years old in his 23rd season. Meanwhile, Alex Ovechkin just finally chased down Wayne Gretzky’s "unbreakable" goal record in April 2025. The goalposts keep moving.

The Problem With the GOAT Conversation

Most people look at a career and just count the rings. But is Tom Brady really a "better athlete" than Bo Jackson just because he has seven Super Bowls? Probably not. Brady is the greatest winner in NFL history, but Bo was a freak of nature who could outrun world-class sprinters and hit 450-foot home runs.

Then you have guys like Michael Jordan. MJ is the gold standard for a reason. It wasn't just the 6-0 Finals record; it was the fact that for a decade, he basically took away the hope of every other superstar in the league. You weren't winning if Mike was in the way.

Why Statistics Can Lie

Take Wayne Gretzky. People say "The Great One" is the undisputed king of hockey. And yeah, his 2,857 points are insane. You could take away every single one of his 894 goals and he’d still be the all-time points leader just on assists alone.

But then Ovechkin breaks the goal record in 2025. Does that make Ovi better? Not necessarily. The game changed. Goalies in the 80s looked like they were wearing cardboard boxes compared to the giants in the net today.

The Unbeatables: Phelps, Biles, and Bolt

When we talk about the top 100 athletes of all time, we have to talk about the "Erasers." These are the people who didn't just win; they made everyone else look like they were moving in slow motion.

  • Michael Phelps: 28 Olympic medals. 23 of them gold. That's not a career; that's a glitch in the matrix.
  • Simone Biles: She has moves named after her that other gymnasts won't even try because they’re too dangerous. She’s the most decorated gymnast ever, and it’s not particularly close.
  • Usain Bolt: In 2009, he ran the 100m in 9.58 seconds. He started celebrating before he even crossed the finish line.

It’s kind of funny when you think about it. We spend all this time debating Messi vs. Ronaldo, but no one ever debates if someone was faster than Bolt. He just was.

The Longevity Monsters

This is where the list gets tricky in 2026. Longevity used to be a secondary stat, but now it’s becoming the whole story.

Lionel Messi winning the World Cup in 2022 basically ended the "Pele vs. Maradona" debate for a lot of fans. He’s won eight Ballon d'Or awards. That’s absurd. Even now, he’s still the focal point of every game he plays.

🔗 Read more: Rudi Johnson: Why the Bengals Powerhouse Still Matters

Then there’s Serena Williams. She won the 2017 Australian Open while eight weeks pregnant. She has 23 Grand Slam titles in the Open Era. People argue about Margaret Court having 24, but Court won a bunch of those before the sport was even fully professional. Most experts agree: Serena is the standard.

Fighting for the Top Spot

Boxing and MMA usually get shoved to the side, but you can’t have a top 100 without Muhammad Ali. He wasn't just a boxer; he was a cultural earthquake. He lost three prime years of his career because he refused to go to Vietnam, and he still came back to beat George Foreman in the "Rumble in the Jungle."

And don't forget the newcomers. Patrick Mahomes is already breathing down Brady's neck. He’s 30 years old and has three rings and three Super Bowl MVPs. If he plays another ten years, the "top 100" lists are going to look very different by 2035.

What Really Matters?

  1. Dominance: Did you own your era? (Tiger Woods in 2000-2001, for example).
  2. Versatility: Could you do things nobody else could? (Jim Thorpe or Shohei Ohtani).
  3. Impact: Did you change how the game is played? (Steph Curry and the three-point revolution).

Actionable Insights for Sports Fans

If you're trying to build your own list or settle a bar bet, stop looking at total wins as the only metric. Look at Peak Performance vs. Longevity.

A guy like Sandy Koufax only had six truly elite years, but those six years were arguably the greatest pitching stretch in baseball history. Does he rank higher than a guy who was "pretty good" for twenty years? Usually, yes.

Check out the latest IFFHS rankings for soccer or the ELO ratings for tennis. They use math to strip away the nostalgia. But at the end of the day, sport is about how these people made us feel. That’s why we’re still talking about Babe Ruth a century after he played.

Start by picking your "Mt. Rushmore" for each sport first. Once you have your four best from basketball, football, baseball, and soccer, the rest of the 100 starts to fall into place. Just be prepared for someone to tell you you're wrong. Because in sports, you always are.