You’re walking down a street in D.C. and you see a guy in a bright red hat with a white, loopy "W" on the front. If you aren't a baseball fan, you might honestly think he’s just a super-fan of the local pharmacy. It’s a running joke that has plagued the nation’s capital for nearly two decades. The walgreens logo vs nationals logo debate isn't just a meme, though; it’s a weirdly deep study in trademark law, sports history, and how our brains process shapes.
Look, they aren't the same. But they are close. Really close.
💡 You might also like: Apply for Unemployment Iowa: How to Actually Get Paid Without the Headaches
Most people assume someone at the Washington Nationals' front office just got lazy and "borrowed" the font from a pill bottle. That's a fun story, but it’s actually wrong. The "Curly W" has a history that stretches back way before the Nationals even existed in their current form, yet the pharmacy chain still technically got there first. It’s a mess of overlapping timelines and script fonts that somehow ended up in a stalemate.
The History of the Curly W: Who Was First?
Let’s get the timeline straight because this is where the "theft" rumors usually fall apart.
Walgreens has been around since 1901. Charles Walgreen started his first shop in Chicago, and by the 1920s, the company was already experimenting with various script logos. The "pretzel-style" W that we recognize today—the one that looks like a calligraphy exercise gone rogue—started appearing in their branding around 1930. They’ve tweaked it over the years, obviously. They’ve changed the red, they’ve messed with the slant, and they even had a blue mortar and pestle at one point. But that loopy, handwritten vibe has been their bread and butter for almost a century.
Then there’s the baseball side.
The Washington Nationals didn't just appear out of thin air in 2005. They moved from Montreal (where they were the Expos), but they wanted to tap into D.C.’s deep baseball roots. Specifically, they looked back at the Washington Senators. The Senators used a very similar "Curly W" starting in 1963. When the team left for Texas in 1971, the logo went into a vault for thirty years. When baseball finally returned to the District, the new owners dusted it off to give the team some instant "heritage."
So, Walgreens had it in the 30s. The Senators had it in the 60s. The Nats reclaimed it in 2005. Technically, the drugstore wins the age race, but the baseball team isn't exactly a newcomer.
Breaking Down the Visuals: Spotting the Difference
If you put them side-by-side, you start to see the "tells." It’s like those "spot the difference" puzzles in the back of a magazine.
- The Flourish: Look at the very beginning of the "W" (the far left side). On the Walgreens logo, the line starts with a sharp, flag-like wave that points straight out or slightly upward. The Nationals’ logo is much more rounded at that starting point, curling back in on itself like a proper piece of cursive.
- The Baseline: This is the big one. The Walgreens logo is flat. It sits on an invisible horizontal line, meant to look stable on a storefront. The Nationals logo is slanted upward. It’s got "dynamic energy" or whatever the graphic designers called it in the pitch meeting. It looks like it’s flying.
- The Thickness: Walgreens tends to have more variation in the "stroke weight." The parts of the letter that go up are thin, and the parts that go down are thick. The Nats logo is a bit more uniform and "chunky," designed to be embroidered on a hat without the thread looking messy.
Basically, one is a signature on a prescription; the other is a badge on a uniform.
Why Didn't Walgreens Sue?
In the world of corporate litigation, companies sue each other over much less. Remember when Apple went after a company for having a pear logo? It happens all the time. So why is Walgreens cool with thousands of people walking around with a logo that looks 95% like theirs?
It comes down to "likelihood of confusion."
Trademark law isn't about owning a shape; it's about protecting a market. To win a lawsuit, Walgreens would have to prove that a reasonable person would walk into a baseball stadium, see the "W" on the pitcher's mound, and try to buy some Tylenol and a gallon of milk.
✨ Don't miss: How to Use a LinkedIn QR Code Generator Without Looking Like a Tech Amateur
Since Walgreens sells cough medicine and the Nationals sell $14 beers and home runs, there’s no "market overlap." They aren't competitors. Actually, it’s kinda free advertising for Walgreens. Every time a Nats game is on TV, that loopy red letter is being blasted into millions of homes. Why would you sue someone for giving you free brand recognition?
There was a weird rumor years ago—totally debunked, by the way—that the two organizations had a secret deal where the Nationals had to pay a "logo tax" or that players had to work shifts as pharmacists. It’s a great urban legend. But honestly, the truth is just that lawyers on both sides realized a fight would be a waste of money.
The Wegmans Exception
Interestingly, Walgreens did go after someone for a loopy W: Wegmans.
In 2010, Walgreens sued the grocery chain Wegmans over their "W" logo. Why? Because Wegmans and Walgreens actually compete. They both sell groceries, pharmacy services, and beauty products. In that case, the "likelihood of confusion" was real. If you’re driving down the highway and see a loopy W, are you at a pharmacy or a grocery store? That case actually led to Wegmans changing their logo to avoid the headache.
The fact that they sued a grocery store but left the baseball team alone tells you everything you need to know about how trademark law works in the real world.
Why the "Curly W" Matters Today
For D.C. locals, the logo has become a point of pride, even if they still get teased about the pharmacy thing. During the 2019 World Series run, the "W" was everywhere. It stopped being a corporate symbol and became a "Win" symbol.
In the design world, this is a classic example of "convergent evolution." Two different entities, working in two different eras, both landed on a script "W" because it looks classic, American, and slightly nostalgic. It feels like 1950s hand-lettering. It feels "official."
If you're ever in a trivia night and this comes up, just remember: Walgreens was first, the Senators made it a sports icon, and the Nats made it a meme.
How to Tell Them Apart at a Glance
If you’re still struggling, use this quick checklist next time you’re at the ballpark or the pharmacy:
- Check the slant. If it looks like it’s uphill, it’s baseball. If it’s level, it’s a flu shot.
- Look at the tail. The Nationals' "W" ends with a sharp downward hook. The Walgreens "W" ends with a more relaxed, horizontal flick.
- The Color. While both are red, the Nationals often use a navy blue outline or pair it with a navy hat. Walgreens almost always keeps it "naked" red on a white background.
Next time someone tells you the Nats stole the Walgreens logo, you can give them the full history lesson. Or just tell them it’s the most recognizable "W" in the world, depending on whether you’re thirsty for a Gatorade or a pennant.
Actionable Insights for Brand Owners:
- Audit your industry: If your logo looks like another brand’s, check if you’re in the same "class" of goods. If you aren't, you're likely safe from trademark infringement.
- Nostalgia sells: Both logos work because they tap into a "vintage" feel. If you’re designing a new identity, consider how script fonts can evoke trust and history.
- Embrace the meme: The Nationals never shied away from the Walgreens comparisons; they let the fans own it, which actually strengthened the brand’s presence in the city.