History has a way of swallowing events whole, especially when they happen in the remote corners of the planet. But Mario Vargas Llosa didn't let that happen to the Canudos Massacre. When he wrote The War of the End of the World, he wasn't just penning a novel; he was reconstructive-surgerying a forgotten apocalypse. It’s a story about a messianic leader, a ragtag army of the "undesirables," and a government so terrified of a religious commune that they burned everything to the ground.
Most people haven't heard of Canudos. That’s a mistake.
Basically, it was the late 19th century in the backlands of Brazil. You had this guy, Antônio Conselheiro—The Counselor. He was a tall, gaunt figure who looked like he stepped out of the Old Testament. He wandered the sertão, the dry, brutal interior of Bahia, repairing cemeteries and preaching. People followed him. Not just a few people. Thousands of them. We’re talking about the former slaves, the dirt-poor farmers, and the outlaws who had nowhere else to go. They built a city called Canudos. They called it a holy land. The Brazilian Republic, which had just recently overthrown the monarchy, called it a threat to the state.
📖 Related: Rose and Jack on the Titanic: Separating James Cameron’s Fiction From the Real 1912 History
They saw it as a monarchist conspiracy. It wasn't. It was just a bunch of people who thought the Republic was the Antichrist because it introduced civil marriage and a new tax system.
The Brutal Reality of the War at the End of the World
The scale of the violence is what really gets you. It wasn't a skirmish. It was a total, grinding war of attrition. The Brazilian government sent four separate military expeditions to wipe out Canudos. The first few failed. Miserably. The soldiers, dressed in heavy European-style uniforms, were picked off by "jagunços" who knew every inch of the thorny, dusty scrubland. It was asymmetrical warfare before that was even a buzzword in military academies.
The War of the End of the World captures the sheer madness of the final siege in 1897. By the time the fourth expedition arrived, the army wasn't taking chances. They brought Krupp cannons. They brought thousands of troops.
Canudos didn't surrender.
They fought for every single hut. Every street. When the city finally fell, the army didn't just win; they committed a literal massacre. They cut the throats of the prisoners. They beheaded the corpse of Antônio Conselheiro. It’s estimated that around 25,000 people died. Imagine that. An entire city-state, wiped off the map because two different worldviews—religious fanaticism and secular republicanism—couldn't find a single inch of common ground.
Why Llosa’s Narrative Still Sticks
Vargas Llosa used Euclides da Cunha’s non-fiction masterpiece, Os Sertões (Rebellion in the Backlands), as his primary source. Cunha was a journalist who actually went to the front lines. He started out thinking the Canudos residents were "degenerates" and ended up realizing the real tragedy was the government's total lack of understanding of its own people.
Llosa takes that and makes it visceral.
He weaves in characters like the Near-Sighted Journalist—basically a stand-in for Cunha—and Jurema, a woman caught in the middle of the carnage. The book is dense. It’s long. It’s heavy. But it’s necessary because it shows how "progress" can be just as murderous as "fanaticism."
The prose isn't always pretty. It shouldn't be. War isn't pretty.
You've got these long, winding descriptions of the sertão that make you feel the thirst. Then, boom. A two-word sentence about a throat being slit. The rhythm of the book matches the chaos of the conflict. It's kinda brilliant, honestly, how he manages to make you feel sympathy for people who, on paper, are religious extremists, while simultaneously showing the logical (if cold) reasoning of the soldiers trying to "save" the country.
Misconceptions About the Conflict
A lot of people think this was just a religious cult. It’s easier to dismiss it that way.
But if you look at the research by historians like Robert Levine, author of Vale of Tears, you see it was way more complex. Canudos was an economic alternative. In a world of near-feudal land ownership, Canudos was a place where people could actually own what they produced. It was a social revolution wrapped in a religious cloak.
Another big myth: Canudos was a pro-monarchy rebel cell funded by the British or the ousted Brazilian Emperor. Total nonsense. There’s zero evidence for it. The government just used that "foreign interference" narrative to justify the sheer amount of money and blood they were pouring into the desert. Sounds familiar, right?
Politicians love a "foreign threat" to distract from domestic failures.
- The residents were mostly peaceful until attacked.
- The Counselor never actually called for an armed revolt.
- The Republican government was deeply unstable and needed a scapegoat.
- The final massacre was one of the darkest stains on Brazilian military history.
The Legacy of the Sertão
The War of the End of the World serves as a warning. It’s about the "great divide."
On one side, you have the urban elites who want to modernize the country based on European models (the Republic). On the other, you have the rural poor who feel abandoned by those same elites. When these two worlds finally meet, they don't talk. They kill.
The book is arguably Llosa's best work—even better than The Feast of the Goat. It’s his most ambitious attempt to understand the "soul" of Latin America, a place where the past and the future are constantly at war. The end of the world isn't a date on a calendar in this context. It’s what happens when empathy fails completely.
The Canudos site is now mostly underwater, flooded by a dam built in the 1970s. It’s almost symbolic. The government literally tried to drown the memory of what happened there. But thanks to Cunha and later Llosa, the story refuses to stay submerged.
Actionable Insights for the Modern Reader
If you're looking to actually dive into this history or the literature, don't just skim a summary.
Start by picking up a copy of The War of the End of the World. It’s a commitment, but it’s worth it. Pay attention to how Llosa handles the "villains." You’ll notice he rarely makes anyone a cartoon. Everyone has a reason for what they’re doing, which makes the eventual slaughter even more haunting.
If you want the facts without the fiction, read Os Sertões by Euclides da Cunha. It’s considered the "Bible of Brazilian nationality." Be warned: the first third is basically a geology and botany textbook. Skip to the parts about the people if you find the soil types boring.
🔗 Read more: Why watching tv online for free is actually better than cable in 2026
Visit the Canudos State Park if you’re ever in Bahia. There’s a small museum there. Seeing the actual terrain—the "caatinga"—changes how you view the conflict. You realize that just surviving in that heat was a feat, let alone fighting a war.
Finally, look at modern polarized movements through the lens of Canudos. When one group calls another "deplorable" or "backward," and the other group calls the first "evil" or "godless," you’re seeing the exact same ingredients that led to the end of the world in the Brazilian desert. Understanding Canudos is about learning to spot those red flags before the Krupp cannons start firing.
Check the bibliography of Llosa’s Nobel Prize citation. They specifically mention this book for a reason. It’s a masterclass in how to turn a specific, localized tragedy into a universal story about the human condition. Don't let the "historical" tag fool you; this stuff is as relevant as today's headlines.