You probably remember the face. Isabella Avila, known to millions as OnlyJayus, became the de facto "cool science teacher" of TikTok almost overnight. They had this fast-paced, high-energy delivery that made random facts about psychology and biology feel like top-tier entertainment. But then everything changed. People started asking what did OnlyJayus do, and the answer wasn't just one single mistake—it was a series of compounding controversies that sparked a massive conversation about creator accountability and the sincerity of "cancel culture" apologies.
Success on social media is brittle. One day you're at the top of the "For You" page, and the next, your past is being excavated by people who feel betrayed. For Avila, the fall didn't come from a new mistake, but from the ghosts of their digital past catching up to their sudden fame.
The Leaked DMs That Started Everything
It all kicked off in early 2021. Screenshots began circulating on Twitter and TikTok that appeared to show a younger Isabella Avila using incredibly offensive language. We aren't just talking about edgy humor here. The messages contained racial slurs—specifically the N-word—and homophobic rhetoric directed at others in a heated, vitriolic way.
The shock was immediate. OnlyJayus had built a brand on being inclusive, quirky, and "woke" in the sense that they often spoke about science and social issues with a progressive lean. Seeing that same person using such hateful language in private messages, even if they were a few years old, felt like a slap in the face to a huge portion of their fan base.
People were hurt. They felt the persona they followed was a lie.
💡 You might also like: The Blake Miranda Duet 2025: Why Fans Are Still Chasing This Ghost
The internet doesn't move on quickly from things like this. The screenshots weren't just a one-off comment; they showed a pattern of using derogatory language as a weapon during arguments. It raised the question: was this just a "dumb kid" mistake, or did it reflect a deeper character flaw that the creator was hiding behind a polished TikTok aesthetic?
The Apology Video and the "Performative" Label
When a creator gets caught like this, the "apology video" is the standard next step. OnlyJayus did exactly that. They posted a video acknowledging the screenshots, admitting they were real, and expressing deep regret. Avila claimed they were ashamed of who they used to be and that the person in those messages didn't represent who they were anymore.
But here is where things got even messier.
Instead of the apology smoothing things over, it actually fueled more anger. Many viewers felt it was performative. Critics pointed out that OnlyJayus only addressed the issue because they got caught, not because they had a genuine change of heart they wanted to share proactively. This is a common theme in the "what did OnlyJayus do" saga—the idea that the apology was a PR move rather than a soul-searching moment of growth.
The Collaboration That Backfired
In an attempt to "do better," Avila reached out to Black creators to collaborate. They wanted to use their massive platform to amplify Black voices as a form of restitution. On paper, it sounds like the right move. In practice? It was a disaster.
💡 You might also like: Lana Del Rey Hot Pics: Why Her Visual Legacy Still Defines Modern Glamour
One specific creator, A03 (also known as @u_m_m_a_h on TikTok), spoke out about their experience. They claimed that after an initial conversation about collaborating, OnlyJayus basically ghosted them. This led to accusations that the attempt at "amplifying voices" was just a tactic to make the public heat die down. It looked like OnlyJayus wanted the credit for being an ally without actually doing the work of being one.
When you're trying to fix a reputation damaged by racism, the worst thing you can do is appear to use Black creators as props for your own redemption arc. That is exactly how it looked to the public.
The "Ghostwriting" Allegations and Content Ethics
While the racial controversy was the biggest blow, it wasn't the only thing people pointed to when discussing what OnlyJayus did. As more eyes focused on their content, people started noticing similarities between Avila's "facts" and existing content on the internet.
- Reddit threads were cited as the primary source for many videos.
- Other smaller creators claimed their specific "fun fact" scripts were being lifted without credit.
- The fast-paced delivery style was compared to other influencers who had been doing it longer.
While "stealing" facts is a gray area—after all, no one owns the fact that a strawberry isn't actually a berry—the lack of attribution rubbed people the wrong way. In the creator economy, "originality" is currency. If you're just reading top-voted Reddit comments from r/todayilearned and passing them off as your own expert knowledge, your credibility starts to leak.
Why OnlyJayus Remained Relevant Despite the Backlash
You might think that after all this, the channel would have folded. That didn't happen. OnlyJayus still has millions of followers. Why?
Honestly, the internet has a short memory for some and a long memory for others. Avila didn't disappear. They continued to post, continued to lean into the "fact" niche, and eventually, the algorithm just kept serving their videos to new people who had no idea about the 2021 drama. This is the "reset" button of the TikTok era. If you keep posting through the hate, eventually the hate gets buried under new metrics.
There is also a segment of the audience that believes in "cancel culture" exhaustion. These fans argued that Avila was young when the messages were sent and that everyone deserves a chance to grow. This divide—between those who want permanent accountability and those who believe in digital forgiveness—is exactly why the debate around OnlyJayus never really reaches a consensus.
The Psychology of the Fall
It’s fascinating to look at the "OnlyJayus" phenomenon from a psychological perspective. Parasocial relationships are powerful. Fans felt they knew Avila. When the DMs leaked, it wasn't just a news story; it was a personal betrayal. This is why the reaction was so visceral compared to a celebrity who might do something much worse but doesn't have that "best friend" vibe with their audience.
Avila’s content was designed to be helpful and educational. When an educational figure is revealed to have used ignorant or hateful language, the irony is too sharp to ignore. It creates cognitive dissonance for the viewer.
What Can We Learn From This?
Looking back at the whole timeline of what OnlyJayus did, there are a few heavy takeaways for anyone who spends time online or wants to be a creator.
- Digital Footprints are Permanent. Those DMs were years old. It doesn't matter. In the digital age, your past is always a screenshot away from becoming your present.
- Apologies Require Action, Not Just Video. The reason the apology failed wasn't the words used; it was the lack of follow-through. If you say you want to amplify voices, you have to actually show up and do it, even when the cameras aren't rolling.
- Authenticity is a Double-Edged Sword. Building a brand on being a "good person" or a "truth-teller" means you are held to a much higher standard than an entertainer who just does stunts or dances.
The OnlyJayus situation remains a case study in how social media fame can be both a rocket ship and a cage. While Avila continues to create content today, the shadow of 2021 remains a permanent part of their online identity.
💡 You might also like: Simone Biles and Jonathan Owens: What Really Happened with the Sports World's Most Talked-About Couple
To navigate the world of social media today, you have to be aware of the "creator lifecycle." What happened here wasn't a fluke; it was a pattern of behavior meeting a platform that demands perfection. If you're following a creator, it's worth looking past the 60-second clips to see the history behind the screen. Verification of information—both the facts in a video and the character of the person presenting them—is the only way to stay an informed consumer in 2026.
Check the sources. Look at the history. Don't just take the "For You" page at face value. Understanding the context behind the creators we watch is the first step in being a more conscious participant in digital culture.
Next Steps for Content Consumers:
Review the creators you follow and check for "transparency reports" or their history of collaboration. Supporting creators who consistently attribute their sources and engage in genuine community building—rather than performative allyship—helps foster a healthier digital environment for everyone. If you're interested in factual content, prioritize creators who cite specific studies or academic journals in their descriptions.