You won't find the word "dinosaur" in the King James Version. Not even once. That usually catches people off guard, but honestly, it makes perfect sense when you look at the timeline of the English language. Sir Richard Owen didn't even coin the term "Dinosauria" until 1842. The Bible was translated into English centuries before that. So, if you're looking for a T-Rex by name, you're going to come up empty-handed. But does that mean the Book is silent on massive, terrifying creatures that roamed the earth? Not exactly.
People get really fired up about this. On one side, you have folks who think the Bible and science are in a boxing match that never ends. On the other, you have scholars who dig into the Hebrew and find descriptions of beasts that sound suspiciously like what we see in Jurassic Park. It's a weird, fascinating intersection of ancient text and paleontology.
The Great Hebrew "Dragon" Mystery
If you crack open a Bible and look for the word tannin, you’ll find it all over the place. Depending on which version you’re holding, it gets translated as "dragon," "sea monster," or "serpent." Genesis 1:21 says God created the "great sea monsters."
Think about that for a second.
The writers were trying to describe something massive and aquatic. In the ancient world, they didn't have carbon dating or skeletal reconstruction. They had sightings and oral traditions. The tannin weren't just big fish; they were something formidable. Some creationist researchers, like those at Answers in Genesis, argue these could very well be references to plesiosaurs or other marine reptiles. Critics, of course, say it's just mythology. But if you’re asking what does the bible say about the dinosaurs, you have to start with the vocabulary of the time. They used the words they had.
Let’s Talk About Behemoth
Job 40 is where things get truly wild. God is basically giving Job a reality check, reminding him how small he is by pointing out some of the most powerful creatures on the planet. He describes something called "Behemoth."
Most modern study Bibles have a little footnote that says "probably a hippo or an elephant."
Honestly? That’s kinda weak.
Look at the text. Job 40:17 says, "He makes his tail stiff like a cedar." Have you ever seen a hippopotamus tail? It looks like a little pink flap of skin. An elephant's tail isn't much more impressive. But a cedar tree? Those are massive, towering, and rigid. The description continues: his bones are tubes of bronze, his limbs like bars of iron. He "ranks first among the works of God." This isn't a swamp pig. It sounds like a sauropod—think Brachiosaurus or Apatosaurus.
When people ask what does the bible say about the dinosaurs, Behemoth is the "smoking gun" for those who believe humans and dinosaurs coexisted. It’s a vivid, anatomical description that fits a long-necked dinosaur far better than any animal currently walking the African savanna.
Leviathan: The Armor-Plated Terror
Right after Behemoth, the Book of Job introduces Leviathan in Chapter 41. This thing is a nightmare. It’s a sea creature that can’t be caught with a hook. Its back has "rows of shields" shut up tight. It breathes fire—or at least, sparks and smoke come out of its nose.
Now, this is where secular skeptics usually check out. "Fire-breathing? Come on."
But hold on. We have bombardier beetles today that create chemical explosions inside their bodies. Is it so crazy to think a massive, extinct reptile might have had a biological mechanism for something similar? Some researchers, like the late Dr. Henry Morris, suggested Leviathan might have been something like a Sarcosuchus—a 40-foot crocodile—or even a literal "dragon" that we now categorize as a dinosaur. Whether it's poetic hyperbole or a literal description, the Bible presents it as a real, historical creature that lived alongside man.
The Timeline Problem
This is the elephant in the room. Or the Diplodocus in the room.
If you take a literal, Young Earth Creationist view (like Ken Ham or the folks at the Institute for Creation Research), then dinosaurs were created on Day 5 and Day 6 of the creation week. That means they lived at the same time as Adam and Eve. It means they were on the Ark.
Wait—dinosaurs on the Ark?
Yeah, it sounds crowded. But remember, God didn't have to send the 100-ton granddaddies. He could have sent juveniles. Most dinosaurs were actually about the size of a sheep or a pony. It’s only the famous ones that were the size of a city bus.
On the flip side, many Christians hold to "Old Earth" views or "Theistic Evolution." They might see the Genesis "days" as long epochs. In that framework, dinosaurs lived and died millions of years before humans showed up, and the Bible simply skips over them because its primary focus is the relationship between God and humanity, not a biological catalog of the Mesozoic era.
Why Does It Even Matter?
You might wonder why people spend so much time debating what does the bible say about the dinosaurs. It’s not just about cool lizards. It’s about authority. If the Bible is historically accurate, then its descriptions of the natural world should hold up. If Behemoth is a dinosaur, it changes the way we look at human history and the fossil record.
There are also weird "out of place" artifacts that people point to. Like the "stegosaurus" carving at the Ta Prohm temple in Cambodia. Or ancient cave paintings that look suspiciously like pterodactyls. To some, these are proof that the biblical account of humans seeing these beasts is true. To others, it's just pareidolia—seeing patterns where they don't exist.
The Cultural Impact of the Dinosaur Gap
For a long time, the church didn't really know what to do with fossils. When the first massive bones were found, some thought they were giants or fallen angels. It took a while for the theological world to catch up with the geological one.
The reality is that the Bible isn't a science textbook. It’s a theological narrative. It doesn't mention penguins, kangaroos, or photosynthesis either, but we know those are real. However, the presence of "dragons" and "great beasts" in the text suggests that the ancients were well aware of massive, terrifying creatures that we now only see in museums.
Digging Deeper Into the Textual Evidence
If we look at the word Re'em in the Hebrew Bible, often translated as "unicorn," we find another puzzle. Modern scholars usually say this was an Aurochs, an extinct wild ox. But for centuries, readers wondered if it was something more exotic. The point is, the biblical landscape was populated by creatures that are now extinct. The world of the Bible was much "wilder" than our manicured modern existence.
There’s also the "Gap Theory," which suggests a massive period of time occurred between Genesis 1:1 and Genesis 1:2. Some believe this is where the "Age of Dinosaurs" fits in—a world that was destroyed and then "re-formed" for human habitation. It’s a way to bridge the gap between the millions of years found in the rock layers and the six-day narrative of the Bible.
What Most People Get Wrong
The biggest misconception is that you have to choose between science and the Bible. You don't.
Science is the study of God's handiwork. If dinosaurs existed—and we know they did because we can go to the Smithsonian and touch their bones—then they are part of the story. Whether they lived 65 million years ago or 6,000 years ago is a question of interpretation, not a question of their existence. The Bible focuses on the who and the why, while science focuses on the how and the when.
Moving Forward With This Knowledge
So, where does that leave you?
👉 See also: Colvin Funeral Home and Crematory Obituaries: Finding the Records You Actually Need
If you're digging into this topic, don't stop at the surface level. The Bible's silence on the specific word "dinosaur" isn't a denial of their existence; it's just a matter of language evolving.
- Read Job 40 and 41 for yourself. Don't just take a commentator's word for it. Look at the descriptions of the tail, the scales, and the habitat.
- Explore different perspectives. Look into the "Young Earth" models at Answers in Genesis and compare them with "Old Earth" perspectives at Reasons to Believe (led by Dr. Hugh Ross).
- Check out the fossil record. Look at how the "dragon" legends across almost every human culture—from China to England to the Americas—might actually be based on historical encounters with leftover dinosaur populations.
The intersection of faith and fossils is a lot more interesting than a simple "yes" or "no" answer. It’s a mystery that stretches back to the very foundations of the earth.
Practical Next Steps
- Compare Bible Translations: Read Job 40 in the KJV, NIV, and ESV. Notice how the footnotes change and how the descriptive language varies.
- Visit a Creation Museum or Science Center: Compare the narratives side-by-side. Look at the skeletal structures of sauropods and see if you think the "cedar tail" description in Job fits.
- Research Ancient Dragon Lore: Study the similarities between dragon myths and dinosaur physiology. It’s a compelling field of study called cryptozoology that often overlaps with biblical studies.
- Evaluate the "Tannin" references: Use a Hebrew lexicon (like Strong’s Concordance) to see every instance where tannin appears in the Old Testament to understand its full context.