It is one of the most stomach-churning scenes in ancient literature. Most people who grew up with a Bible in the house or an interest in Roman-era history have heard the grisly tale of a king struck down in his prime, rotting from the inside out while still drawing breath. The image of Herod eaten by worms isn't just a Sunday school horror story; it is a bizarre intersection of theology, ancient medical mystery, and political propaganda that has kept historians arguing for two millennia.
We need to get one thing straight right away: there isn't just one "Herod." The guy people usually think of when they hear about the worm incident is Herod Agrippa I, the grandson of Herod the Great. While his grandfather was the one who allegedly tried to hunt down the infant Jesus, Agrippa was the one who had a very public, very gross meltdown in Caesarea around 44 AD.
The Scene at Caesarea: Divine Ego Meets Biological Reality
According to the Book of Acts, specifically chapter 12, Agrippa appeared before a massive crowd wearing "royal robes" and gave a speech. The people, clearly trying to get on his good side, started shouting that his voice was the voice of a god, not a man. He didn't correct them. That was his big mistake. The text says an angel of the Lord struck him down, and he was eaten by worms and died.
Josephus, the famous Jewish-Roman historian, tells a remarkably similar story, though he skips the "angel" part and focuses on the physical agony. Josephus describes Agrippa noticing an owl perched on a rope above him—an omen of death—and then being seized by violent pains in his heart and abdomen. He lingered for five days in "unremitting pain" before finally kicking the bucket. Josephus doesn't explicitly mention worms, but he describes a putrefying, agonizing abdominal failure that matches the biblical account’s visceral tone.
It’s easy to dismiss this as mere "poetic justice." Ancient writers loved a good "death by vermin" trope to show that a tyrant was literally rotting because of their moral decay. But if we look at this through a modern medical lens, the description of Herod eaten by worms starts to look like a very real, albeit terrifying, medical diagnosis.
What Does Modern Medicine Say?
Honestly, if you look at the symptoms—sudden onset, intense abdominal pain, and the presence of larvae or parasites—there are a few leading theories that don't involve divine lightning bolts.
1. Fournier’s Gangrene
This is the one that makes medical students cringe. It’s a necrotizing fasciitis (flesh-eating bacteria) of the perineal area. Josephus actually describes Herod the Great (the grandfather) suffering from something similar: a "putrefaction of the privy parts" that produced worms. It’s possible both Herods shared a genetic predisposition or just lived in an era where hygiene was... questionable. If a king develops a massive, gangrenous infection in his groin, maggots can absolutely infest the dying tissue while the patient is still alive. It’s a literal case of being eaten by worms.
2. Ascariasis (Roundworms)
This is probably the most "direct" explanation for the Acts account. Ascaris lumbricoides are large parasitic roundworms that live in the human intestines. In severe cases, they can form a bolus—a giant tangled ball of worms—that causes a total bowel obstruction. When the intestines rupture, or if the infestation is heavy enough, the worms can actually exit the body through the mouth, nose, or... other exits. To a terrified crowd in 44 AD, seeing a king suddenly collapse and start "leaking" giant worms would certainly look like a curse from God.
👉 See also: Bangkok Good Place to Live: What Most People Get Wrong in 2026
3. Schistosomiasis and Myiasis
Some researchers, like Dr. Jan Hirschmann who has published extensively on historical deaths, suggest that these ancient "worm" accounts might refer to internal parasites that eventually became visible. There's also myiasis, which is the infestation of live human tissue by fly larvae (maggots). If Herod had an existing ulcer or a ruptured cyst, flies could have laid eggs in the wound, leading to a visible infestation that would have been interpreted as a divine judgment.
Why Ancient Historians Obsessed Over This
You've got to understand the "politics of the gut" in the ancient world. In the first century, how you died was seen as a direct reflection of how you lived. If you were a "good" leader, you died peacefully in your sleep. If you were a tyrant who overstepped your bounds or claimed to be a god, you had to die in the most humiliating, "unclean" way possible.
The writers of the New Testament had a specific agenda: they wanted to show that the Roman-backed puppet kings were nothing compared to the power of the early Church. By recording that Herod was eaten by worms, they weren't just reporting news; they were making a theological point about the mortality of earthly rulers. Josephus, while not a Christian, had his own reasons. He wanted to show that even those favored by Rome were subject to the laws of the Jewish God.
It's a weirdly consistent theme. Other tyrants in history were given the "worm treatment" too. Antiochus IV Epiphanes, who desecrated the Jewish Temple, was said in the Book of Maccabees to have been so infested with worms that his flesh fell off while he was still alive. It’s the ultimate ancient "gotcha."
The Physicality of the Agony
Imagine the heat of Caesarea in late summer. You're wearing a suit of silver mail—as Josephus claims Agrippa was—which is reflecting the sun and making you sweat. You're already feeling a bit "off," perhaps a dull ache in your gut from a parasitic load you've carried for years. You stand up to speak, the crowd roars, and then snap.
👉 See also: Why 2/3 times 2/3 Still Trips People Up: The Math of Fractions Explained
Something gives way inside. An intestinal wall perforates. Or perhaps a cyst caused by a tapeworm (Echinococcus) ruptures, sending the body into immediate anaphylactic shock and peritonitis. The pain is so sharp you can't breathe. You're carried back to the palace on a litter. Over the next few days, as your organs shut down and your tissue begins to necrotize in the Mediterranean humidity, the "worms" become visible to your horrified attendants.
It wasn't a quick death. It was a five-day public dissolution.
Beyond the Gore: Lessons from Herod’s Demise
It’s easy to get lost in the gross-out factor, but the story of Herod eaten by worms persists because it taps into a universal human anxiety about the fragility of power. One minute you're a king in silver robes, the next you're a host for larvae.
When we look at this through the lens of history and science, a few "next steps" emerge for anyone trying to understand the intersection of ancient texts and reality:
🔗 Read more: Why Dark Neutral Blonde Hair Is Actually the Hardest Color to Get Right
- Cross-Reference Sources: Never take one ancient account as the whole truth. Comparing the Book of Acts with Josephus's Antiquities of the Jews (Book 19) provides a much more nuanced view of Agrippa's death.
- Acknowledge Literary Tropes: Recognize that "death by worms" was a standard way for ancient writers to describe the end of a villain. It doesn't mean it didn't happen, but it means the description is intentionally tuned for maximum "grossness."
- Think Medically, Not Just Mythically: Use resources like the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, which often features retrospective diagnoses of historical figures. This turns a "ghost story" into a fascinating study of ancient epidemiology.
What we see in the end isn't just a King who forgot he was human. We see a man who likely suffered from a severe, untreated parasitic infection or a catastrophic internal rupture—conditions that modern medicine can treat in an afternoon but which, in 44 AD, were enough to bring down a monarchy and create a legend that hasn't faded in two thousand years.
The reality of being eaten by worms might be more about biology than biology’s Creator, but for Herod Agrippa, the result was the same: a swift, painful exit from the stage of history.
Actionable Insights for Historical Research:
If you're looking to verify these events yourself, start by reading Josephus’s Jewish Antiquities alongside the 12th chapter of the Book of Acts. Pay attention to the discrepancies in the timeline—Josephus mentions a five-day illness, while Acts implies a more immediate (though not necessarily instantaneous) death. To understand the medical side, search for "retrospective diagnosis of Herod Agrippa" in academic databases like PubMed or Google Scholar. You'll find that the "worm" theory is often debated against more modern possibilities like peritonitis or acute appendicitis, providing a masterclass in how we reconstruct the past from limited, biased, and often gruesome evidence.