What Really Happened With Megan Fox Amanda Seyfried Kissing

What Really Happened With Megan Fox Amanda Seyfried Kissing

It was 2009. Megan Fox was basically the biggest star on the planet, freshly minted from Transformers, and Amanda Seyfried was the girl-next-door who’d just crushed it in Mamma Mia!. Then came Jennifer’s Body. The movie was marketed like a teenage boy's fever dream, but at its center was a moment that would eventually become the stuff of internet legend: megan fox amanda seyfried kissing.

If you were around when the trailer dropped, you remember the hype. It was everywhere. But honestly, if you talk to the actresses today—or even look back at their interviews from that press tour—the reality of filming that scene was a lot less "sultry Hollywood magic" and a lot more "panicking about skin texture."

The Stress Behind the Scenes

Megan Fox has been pretty open about the fact that she and Amanda were "horrified" about the scene. Not because they didn't like each other—they’re actually friends—but because of the technical pressure. Imagine being 23 years old, under a literal microscope, and knowing that the entire marketing budget of a multi-million dollar film is resting on how "hot" your make-out scene looks.

Fox told Variety that they were both stressed out for a very relatable reason: chin acne.

📖 Related: Alex Claremont Diaz Actor: What Most People Get Wrong About Taylor Zakhar Perez

"I remember we were both stressed out because we had chin acne and there was gonna be this micro-close-up of us kissing," she said. It's funny to think about now, but at the time, they were terrified the camera would pick up every little bump. They were literally begging the editors to "paint that out."

Amanda Seyfried had her own take. She told InStyle back then that it was "weird" because it was her first time doing a real kissing scene with a woman. She mentioned the "woman's smell"—soft and floral—and how the pheromones just felt different. It wasn't necessarily bad, just... different.

Why the Megan Fox Amanda Seyfried Kissing Scene Matters Now

For a long time, this movie was dismissed as a flop. It made barely $2.8 million on its opening day. People thought it was just a "gratuitous" scene meant to sell tickets to guys who didn't care about the plot. But history has been much kinder to Jennifer’s Body.

👉 See also: The Black Eye Club Conspiracy Theory: Why Do So Many Famous People Have Shiners?

The director, Karyn Kusama, and the writer, Diablo Cody, have both pointed out that the kiss wasn't just a stunt. It was about the "secret language" between girls. Anyone who’s had an intense, almost-romantic female friendship in high school knows exactly what they were trying to capture. That boundary-blurring closeness where you want to wear her clothes, be her, and maybe—just for a second—kiss her.

A Shift in Perspective

  1. The Male Gaze vs. Female Desire: In 2009, the media saw the kiss as a marketing ploy. In 2026, we see it as a depiction of toxic, possessive female friendship.
  2. Queer Awakening: Megan Fox has mentioned that so many women come up to her now saying this movie helped them realize they were gay or bisexual.
  3. The Marketing Fail: The movie was sold to boys, but it was for girls. The kiss was the bridge between those two worlds that the marketing team didn't know how to cross.

Was it Actually Gratuitous?

Diablo Cody, who won an Oscar for Juno, has defended the scene for years. She’s noted that if the protagonists were a guy and a girl, no one would call a kiss "gratuitous" during a tense emotional moment. But because it was two women, it was treated like a "stunt."

The truth is, Jennifer (Fox) was a literal succubus. She was using her sexuality as a weapon. Needy (Seyfried) was the only person who truly loved her. That kiss was the peak of their messed-up, co-dependent relationship. It was supposed to be uncomfortable. It was supposed to feel like Jennifer was consuming Needy's space.

The Cult Classic Status

If you look at TikTok or Twitter today, Jennifer’s Body is a masterpiece. The megan fox amanda seyfried kissing scene isn't just a clip from a horror movie anymore; it’s a symbol of the "Good For Her" subgenre of film.

Amanda Seyfried eventually came around to the scene's legacy, too. She told W Magazine years later, "We kissed really well together... it's actually really sexy." She even lamented that the "masses didn't show up" when it first came out. They definitely showed up later, though. The movie has a massive following now, and there are even whispers of a potential sequel—something both actresses have expressed interest in.

Moving Forward With The Legacy

If you’re revisiting the film or seeing that clip for the hundredth time, it helps to keep a few things in mind.

First, acknowledge the context. This wasn't a movie made to exploit the actresses, even if the trailers felt that way. It was a movie made by women about the horrors of being a teenage girl. The kiss is a part of that horror—and that beauty.

Second, look at how the actresses have grown. Amanda Seyfried is an Academy Award nominee now, and Megan Fox has become a vocal advocate for how she was mistreated by the industry during that era. They’ve both moved past the "chin acne" fears and into a space where they can appreciate the cult impact they made.

🔗 Read more: Who is Don Lemon? The Rise, Fall, and Post-CNN Pivot of a Media Lightning Rod

To really get the most out of this piece of pop culture history, go back and watch the full film with the "female gaze" in mind. Focus on the dialogue—Diablo Cody's "Juno-speak" is at its peak here. Notice how the camera lingers on the girls not just when they're being "sexy," but when they're being messy, bloody, and vulnerable. That's where the real story lives.


Next Steps for Fans:

  • Watch the 10th-anniversary interviews with Karyn Kusama to hear about the "mis-marketing" of the film.
  • Check out the "Jennifer’s Body" soundtrack, which is a perfect time capsule of 2009 emo and alternative rock.
  • Look for the "Unrated" version of the film to see the scene in its full, intended context without the theatrical edits.