If you spent any time on the internet in 2022, you basically couldn't escape the cameras in that Virginia courtroom. It was everywhere. TikTok was flooded with clips of lawyers arguing about muffins and megapixels. Honestly, even years later, people are still trying to sort through the noise to figure out what did johnny depp do to amber heard and why two different courts in two different countries seemed to disagree so sharply.
It’s complicated. Kinda messy, too.
To understand the reality, you've got to look past the memes. You have to look at the specific allegations that were actually "proven" in one court and "rejected" in another. It’s not just a story of "he said, she said"—it’s a story of two very different legal systems trying to pin down the truth of a toxic relationship.
The UK Libel Trial: Where 12 Incidents Were "Proven"
Most people start with the 2022 US trial, but the real legal groundwork happened in London back in 2020. Johnny Depp sued The Sun for calling him a "wife-beater." Because of how UK libel laws work, the newspaper had to prove that what they wrote was "substantially true."
Basically, they had to prove Depp actually was a wife-beater.
Amber Heard wasn't the one being sued there, but she was the star witness. She brought 14 specific allegations of physical assault to the table. We're talking about everything from slaps in Los Angeles to a "three-day hostage situation" in Australia.
💡 You might also like: The Map That Leads to You: What Really Happened With the KJ Apa Madelyn Cline Movie
The judge, Mr. Justice Nicol, went through every single one. He didn't just glance at them. He wrote a 129-page ruling. In the end, he decided that 12 of those 14 incidents were "proved to the civil standard."
What does that actually mean? It means the judge thought it was more likely than not that they happened.
The Australia Incident
This is the big one everyone talks about. The severed finger. In the UK, the judge accepted Heard’s account that Depp had pushed her, hit her, and put her in "fear of her life." He didn't believe Depp’s claim that Heard was the one who threw a vodka bottle and cut his finger off. Instead, he found that Depp had likely caused the injury himself during a drunken rage.
The "Monster"
One of the most chilling parts of the UK testimony was the discussion of "The Monster." This was the name Depp reportedly gave to his alter ego—the version of himself that came out when he was using drugs or alcohol. The judge accepted that Depp used this term to describe a part of his personality that would do things he wouldn't otherwise do.
The US Defamation Trial: Why the Jury Saw It Differently
Flash forward to 2022. Fairfax, Virginia. This time, Depp was suing Heard directly over an op-ed she wrote in The Washington Post. He wasn't just fighting a tabloid; he was fighting her.
The energy was totally different. You've probably seen the clips of Depp’s lawyer, Camille Vasquez, cross-examining Heard. It was aggressive. It was televised. And unlike the UK judge, this seven-person jury didn't buy Heard’s story.
They found that her claims of domestic abuse were "false" and made with "actual malice." They awarded Depp over $10 million in damages.
The Credibility Gap
So, what changed? A lot of it came down to evidence that wasn't as prominent in the UK.
- The Photos: Depp’s team pointed out that in many photos taken right after alleged beatings, Heard appeared to have no visible injuries. They argued she used makeup or "bruise kits" to fake the marks.
- The Audio: This was the smoking gun for many people. The jury heard recordings where Heard admitted to "hitting" Depp. "I was hitting you, I wasn't punching you," she said in one clip. To the jury, this painted her as the aggressor, or at least a participant in "mutual abuse."
- The Donation: Heard had promised to donate her $7 million divorce settlement to charity. It turned out she hadn't actually finished paying it. To the jury, this made her look like she was lying for financial or reputational gain.
The Specific Allegations of Physical Abuse
When we ask what did johnny depp do to amber heard, we have to look at the specific "acts" she described under oath. Whether you believe her or not, these are the claims that formed the backbone of the legal battles:
- The "First Hit": Heard claimed Depp first hit her in 2013 after she laughed at one of his tattoos (the "Wino Forever" one). She said he slapped her three times across the face.
- The Plane Kick: During a flight from Boston to LA in 2014, Heard alleged Depp was blackout drunk and kicked her in the back because he was jealous of her co-star James Franco. Depp’s team argued he was just sleeping.
- The Phone Throw: In May 2016, right before their divorce, Heard claimed Depp threw a phone at her face, hitting her in the eye. This was the incident that led to her famous "bruised face" photo outside the courthouse when she filed for a restraining order.
Depp denied every single one of these. He swore, "Never did I myself reach the point of striking Ms. Heard in any way nor have I ever struck any woman in my life."
The Settlement and Where They Are Now
By the end of 2022, both sides were tired. They settled. Heard agreed to pay Depp $1 million—a far cry from the $10 million the jury ordered—which his team said would be donated to charity.
They both moved on, sort of. Depp started showing up at film festivals again. Heard moved to Spain to live a quieter life with her daughter.
But the question of what did johnny depp do to amber heard remains a polarizing topic. If you believe the UK judge, he was a man who became violent when he was "The Monster." If you believe the US jury, he was a victim of a "hoax" designed to ruin his career.
Actionable Insights for Following Celeb Legal Dramas
If you're still trying to make sense of cases like this, here are a few things to keep in mind:
- Venue Matters: Libel laws in the UK are "pro-plaintiff," meaning the publisher has to prove they are right. In the US, the burden is on the person suing to prove the other person lied. This is why the results were so different.
- Public Opinion vs. Legal Fact: Viral clips are edited to make one side look good. If you really want to know what happened, you have to read the trial transcripts. They are long, but they contain the nuance that TikTok skips.
- The Complexity of Domestic Violence: Expert witnesses in the trial, like Dr. Shannon Curry and Dr. Dawn Hughes, provided conflicting diagnoses of the couple. It highlights that these situations are rarely black and white; they often involve deep-seated psychological patterns on both sides.
The truth probably lies somewhere in the middle of those two courtrooms. It was a relationship fueled by substance abuse, fame, and a total lack of boundaries. While the legal cases are closed, the debate over who did what will likely continue as long as their movies are still playing on screens.
To get a truly unbiased view, you should look into the unsealed court documents from the Virginia trial. They contain hundreds of pages of evidence that the jury never even got to see, including more text messages and medical records that add even more layers to this story.