History is rarely a straight line. If you’re looking for a single date or a lone "bad guy" moment that explains what started the Ukraine Russia War, you’re going to be disappointed. It’s a tangle. It’s decades of broken promises, deep-seated identity crises, and a massive tug-of-war between Moscow and the West.
Honestly? Most people point to February 24, 2022. That’s the day the missiles started hitting Kyiv. But the fuse was lit way before that.
The 2014 Breaking Point: Maidan and Crimea
You can't talk about the current nightmare without looking at the Maidan Revolution. Back in 2013, Ukraine’s then-president, Viktor Yanukovych, ditched a big trade deal with the European Union. He leaned toward Russia instead. People went nuts. Tens of thousands of protesters occupied Kyiv’s Independence Square—the Maidan. It was freezing. It was violent. Eventually, Yanukovych fled to Russia.
🔗 Read more: Why Was Robert E. Lee Important: What Most People Get Wrong
Vladimir Putin didn't see this as a grassroots movement for democracy. He saw it as a CIA-backed coup.
Russia responded fast. They sent "little green men"—soldiers in uniforms without insignia—into Crimea. Within weeks, Russia annexed the peninsula. They claimed it was about protecting ethnic Russians, but it was also about the Black Sea Fleet base in Sevastopol. Simultaneously, a separatist war broke out in the Donbas region of eastern Ukraine. Donetsk and Luhansk became names we'd hear for the next decade.
This was the real start. The 2022 invasion was just the "full-scale" version of a war that had been simmering for eight years.
The NATO Obsession
If you listen to the Kremlin, the biggest factor in what started the Ukraine Russia War is NATO expansion. Putin has spent years grumbling about the "red line."
In 1990, during German reunification, there were verbal assurances given to Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev that NATO wouldn't move "one inch eastward." Russia clings to that. But those weren't written in a treaty. Fast forward: Poland, the Czech Republic, and the Baltic states all joined NATO. Russia felt encircled.
Ukraine is different. For Russia, Ukraine is a "buffer zone" they aren't willing to lose. When the 2008 Bucharest Summit suggested Ukraine could eventually join NATO, it set off alarm bells in Moscow that haven't stopped ringing since.
Cultural Identity and the "One People" Myth
There is a weird, deep-seated psychological element here too. In 2021, Putin published a massive 5,000-word essay titled "On the Historical Unity of Russians and Ukrainians." He basically argued that Ukraine isn't a real country. He claimed Russians and Ukrainians are "one people" and that the modern borders were a mistake made by the Soviet Union.
Ukraine, obviously, disagrees.
Since 1991, Ukraine has been trying to build its own distinct identity. They've been moving away from the Russian language in schools and official business. They’ve been looking toward Brussels, not Moscow. This "drift" toward the West was seen by the Kremlin as an existential threat to the "Russian World." It wasn't just about missiles; it was about the fear of a successful, democratic, Western-aligned Ukraine right on Russia's doorstep.
Failed Diplomacy: The Minsk Agreements
Why didn't the world stop it between 2014 and 2022? They tried.
The Minsk I and Minsk II agreements were supposed to create a ceasefire. They were brokered by France and Germany. The idea was to give the Donbas region more autonomy while keeping it part of Ukraine. But it was a disaster. Neither side trusted the other. Ukraine saw it as a way for Russia to keep a "trojan horse" inside their politics. Russia saw it as a way to keep Ukraine out of NATO forever.
The shelling in the East never truly stopped. By late 2021, Russia began massing over 100,000 troops on the border.
The Immediate Catalysts of 2022
By early February 2022, the rhetoric reached a fever pitch. Putin gave a rambling televised speech where he called the Ukrainian government "neo-Nazis" and "drug addicts." He claimed Ukraine was seeking nuclear weapons—a claim for which there was zero evidence.
He then recognized the independence of the "Donetsk People's Republic" and the "Luhansk People's Republic." This was the legal pretext he needed. He called the invasion a "Special Military Operation."
It was a gamble. Putin likely thought Kyiv would fall in three days. He thought Zelenskyy would run. He was wrong.
Energy and Economics
Money matters. Don't let anyone tell you otherwise. Ukraine sits on massive transit pipelines for Russian gas headed to Europe. For years, Russia tried to bypass Ukraine with projects like Nord Stream 2.
There’s also the issue of resources. Eastern Ukraine is rich in coal and minerals. The Black Sea has untapped gas reserves. Controlling these areas gives Russia more leverage over the global energy market. It's not the only reason for the war, but it’s a significant piece of the puzzle that often gets ignored in favor of the bigger "geopolitical" talk.
The Role of Miscalculation
War is often the result of someone being profoundly wrong.
Putin's inner circle had become an echo chamber. He believed his own military was invincible and that the West was too divided to react. He underestimated the resolve of the Ukrainian people. He didn't realize that eight years of fighting in the Donbas had turned the Ukrainian military from a disorganized mess into a battle-hardened force.
On the flip side, the West spent years trying to appease Russia through trade. The "Wandel durch Handel" (Change through Trade) policy in Germany was a total failure. It didn't make Russia more democratic; it just made Europe dependent on Russian gas.
What Most People Get Wrong
It’s easy to think this is just a land grab. It’s more than that. It’s a clash of worldviews.
One side believes in the "spheres of influence" model—where big countries get to tell their neighbors what to do. The other side believes in sovereignty—that even a smaller country like Ukraine gets to choose its own alliances.
When you ask what started the Ukraine Russia War, the answer is a combination of Putin's imperial ambitions, the unresolved trauma of the Soviet collapse, and the simple fact that Ukraine refused to be a satellite state any longer.
👉 See also: Mt Spurr Eruption 1992 Anchorage: What Really Happened When the Sky Turned Black
Real-World Implications Today
The fallout hasn't just been in the trenches.
- Global Food Security: Ukraine is the "breadbasket of Europe." The war caused wheat and fertilizer prices to skyrocket, affecting people from Egypt to Indonesia.
- NATO Expansion: Ironically, Putin’s move to stop NATO expansion did the opposite. Finland and Sweden joined, doubling Russia’s direct border with NATO territory.
- The Tech War: This is the first major war where commercial drones and satellite internet (like Starlink) have played a decisive role on the front lines.
Moving Forward: Actionable Insights
If you're trying to stay informed about this conflict, don't just follow the daily "map updates" on Twitter. Look at the long-term trends.
- Follow verified sources: Use organizations like the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) or the BBC’s investigative teams. Avoid anonymous accounts claiming "huge breakthroughs" every ten minutes.
- Check the economics: Watch the price of Brent Crude oil and European gas futures. The war's longevity is tied directly to Russia's ability to fund it through energy sales.
- Understand the "Frozen Conflict" risk: Realize that even if the shooting slows down, the underlying issues—the status of Crimea and the NATO question—aren't going away. This could be a generational struggle.
- Monitor the Global South: Pay attention to how countries like India and Brazil react. Their stance on sanctions and trade will ultimately decide how isolated Russia really is.
The war didn't start in a vacuum. It started because of a fundamental disagreement over who gets to define the future of Eastern Europe. Until that's resolved, the peace is going to be hard to find.