Honestly, if you tuned in expecting a political cage match, you probably felt a little weird. It wasn't the usual shouting. In fact, for long stretches of the night, JD Vance and Tim Walz were... nice to each other? It was strange. But beneath all that "Midwest nice" and the polite head-nodding, a very real battle for optics was happening. Everyone wants to know who is winning the vp debate 2024, and the answer depends entirely on whether you care about the "vibes" or the actual receipts.
Post-debate polls from heavy hitters like CBS News and CNN showed a race that was basically a coin flip. CBS had Vance at 42% and Walz at 41%. That’s a statistical tie, folks. CNN’s flash poll gave a slight edge to Vance at 51% to 49%. If you’re looking for a knockout blow, you won't find it here. What you will find is a masterclass in two very different ways to win over an audience.
The JD Vance Strategy: Polished and Unflappable
JD Vance walked onto that stage with one goal: stop being the "weird" guy. For weeks, the headlines hadn't been kind to him. He needed to look like someone you could actually imagine sitting in the Oval Office. And he mostly pulled it off. He was smooth. He didn't get rattled when the moderators fact-checked him on immigration—even when they muted his mic.
Vance spent a lot of time "punching up." He didn't just attack Walz; he went after Kamala Harris. He basically treated Walz like a bystander while he lit into the Biden-Harris record on the economy and the border. It was a smart move. By ignoring the guy across from him, he made himself look like he was already part of the main event.
👉 See also: Five Point Correctional Facility: The Truth About Life Inside New York's Maximum Security
Where Vance Gained Ground
- The Economy: He hammered home the "common sense" angle, talking about the "sting of inflation" in a way that felt personal.
- Style Points: He was objectively the more experienced debater. He looked at the camera. He smiled. He didn't fumble.
- Immigration: This is his home turf. Even when things got heated over Springfield, Ohio, he kept his voice level and redirected to "overwhelmed" resources.
Tim Walz: The Slow Starter Who Found His Feet
If we’re being real, Walz looked nervous at first. He was stumbling over his words during the opening questions about the Middle East. He used a lot of "umms." He kept looking down at his notes while Vance was staring right into the soul of the American voter. For the first twenty minutes, it felt like Walz was losing the 2024 VP debate by a landslide.
But then, something shifted. He started talking about healthcare and abortion. That’s when the "Coach Walz" energy finally showed up. He stopped trying to be a polished politician and started acting like the guy who knows how to explain complex stuff to a classroom. He called out Vance for "creating stories" about migrants and pointed out that real-world lies have real-world consequences, like bomb threats at schools.
The Moment That Changed Everything
The night's biggest haymaker came right at the end. Walz asked Vance point-blank: "Did Donald Trump win the 2020 election?"
Vance’s response—"Tim, I’m focused on the future"—was described by Walz as a "damning non-answer." For a lot of undecided voters, that was the moment the "civil" mask slipped. It reminded people why they were skeptical of the Trump-Vance ticket in the first place.
Breaking Down the "Who Won" Polls
You can’t just look at one number. You’ve got to see who was watching. According to a YouGov poll conducted shortly after the event, Vance was seen as the "better debater" by a 45% to 20% margin. That sounds like a blowout, right? Not exactly.
📖 Related: Angel Maturino Reséndiz: The Terrifying Truth About the Railroad Killer
Being a better debater doesn't always mean you won the argument. The same polls showed that Walz was seen as more "in touch" with the needs of ordinary people. He won on the substance of healthcare and reproductive rights, which are huge drivers for the Democratic base and moderate women.
Here is how the issues split:
- Immigration & Economy: Lean Vance.
- Abortion & Healthcare: Strong Lean Walz.
- Gun Safety: Toss-up, but Walz’s "I’m a hunter" line resonated with some rural viewers.
Why This Debate Actually Matters (Maybe)
Vice presidential debates usually don't move the needle. People vote for the top of the ticket. But 2024 is different. This might be the last time we see these two parties on the same stage before the election. Since Trump has signaled he won't do another debate with Harris, this 90-minute window was the final chance for both sides to make a "closing argument" to the nation.
Vance succeeded in humanizing himself. He showed he could be "reasonable" rather than "extreme." Walz succeeded in landing the final punch on democracy and the January 6th events.
Actionable Takeaways for the Undecided Voter
If you’re still trying to figure out who is winning the vp debate 2024 for your own personal vote, don't just look at the highlights. Look at the specific policy gaps that were exposed during the 90 minutes.
📖 Related: Kim Jong Un Winnie the Pooh: What Most People Get Wrong
- Check the Fact-Checks: Both candidates played fast and loose with some numbers. Vance's claims about "illegal" status in Springfield and Walz's "misspeaking" about being in China during Tiananmen Square are worth looking into via non-partisan sources.
- Watch the Closing Statements: This is where they stopped being nice. Vance doubled down on the idea that the country is "broken," while Walz leaned into the "joy" and "future" messaging of the Harris campaign.
- Focus on the "Non-Answers": Both men dodged. Vance dodged the 2020 election question; Walz dodged some specific questions on how to pay for the administration's economic plans. Those silences often tell you more than the talking points.
Ultimately, the winner of the 2024 vice presidential debate isn't the guy who spoke the best—it’s the guy who didn't scare away the 5% of voters who are still undecided in Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin. Whether that was Vance's smooth delivery or Walz's folksy "firewall for democracy" remains to be seen in the coming weeks of polling.