Most teen movies from the year 2000 feel like time capsules. They are filled with low-rise jeans, frosted tips, and plotlines that haven't aged particularly well. But Bring It On is different. It’s weirdly resilient. Even if you haven't seen it in years, you probably remember the "Brrr! It’s cold in here!" cheer or the intense second-hand cringe of the "spirit stick" incident. It’s iconic.
But here is the thing: what most people remember as a bubbly cheerleader comedy is actually a pretty biting critique of systemic theft. Honestly, if you rewatch it today, the central conflict—the Rancho Carne Toros stealing routines from the East Compton Clovers—feels less like a "rah-rah" sports movie and more like a crash course in cultural appropriation. It was ahead of its time. Seriously.
The Theft at the Heart of the Routine
The plot is straightforward. Kirsten Dunst plays Torrance Shipman, the newly minted captain of the Toros. She's stoked. Then she finds out her predecessor, "Big Red," has been stealing choreography from a squad in East Compton for years. The Clovers, led by Gabrielle Union’s character Isis, are better, faster, and more creative, but they lack the funding to make it to nationals.
It’s a gut punch.
💡 You might also like: Original Carrie Movie Cast: What Really Happened to the Prom Night Class of 1976
Torrance has to grapple with the fact that her team’s entire legacy is built on a lie. This isn't just about pom-poms; it’s about who gets credit for labor and who gets the trophy because they have the "look" or the zip code that judges prefer. Director Peyton Reed and writer Jessica Bendinger didn't shy away from this. They made the "villain" (if you can even call her that) the systemic unfairness of the sport itself.
Most teen films of that era treated race as a background element or a "best friend" trope. Bring It On put it front and center. It showed that the Toros weren't just "inspired" by the Clovers; they were actively stripping them of their intellectual property because they knew they could get away with it. That’s a heavy theme for a movie marketed with glittery posters.
Why the Dialogue Still Hits
The writing is snappy. It's fast. It’s also incredibly specific to the subculture. Phrases like "cheer-ocracy" or "spirit fingers" entered the lexicon immediately.
Wait. Think about that for a second.
A movie about cheerleading managed to invent a dialect that people still use twenty-six years later. That doesn't happen by accident. Bendinger actually spent time researching the world of competitive cheer, which was just beginning to explode into the massive industry it is today.
The Casting Was Everything
Kirsten Dunst brought a frantic, earnest energy to Torrance. She wasn't just a "blonde lead." She was a girl having a moral crisis in a pleated skirt. But the real star power came from the Clovers. Gabrielle Union, alongside members of the R&B group Blaque (Shamari DeVoe, Brandi Williams, and the late Natina Reed), provided a necessary counterweight.
Without the Clovers’ fierce competence, the movie would have been a hollow story about a girl finding her confidence. Instead, we got a story about accountability. When Isis tells Torrance, "You wanna make it right? Then tell your team to come up with their own routines," it isn't just a line. It's a demand for basic integrity.
The Reality of Competitive Cheerleading in 2026
If you look at the sport now, it’s a multi-billion dollar machine. The film Bring It On basically predicted the professionalization of cheer. Back in 2000, "all-star" cheerleading was growing, but the movie highlighted the transition from sideline support to legitimate athleticism.
The stunts you see in the film were performed by actual cheerleaders and gymnasts. There wasn't much CGI back then to fix a wobbly pyramid. That raw, physical effort is visible on screen. You can see the bruises. You can see the genuine fear when someone is being tossed twenty feet into the air.
- The Budget Gap: The film accurately portrayed how school funding affects performance. The Toros have new uniforms and a choreographed "show." The Clovers have talent but have to hustle for sponsorships just to get to Florida.
- The Technicality: While some of the moves are dated, the "basket tosses" and "liberties" shown were the gold standard for high school squads at the time.
- The Judging Bias: The finale of the film is actually quite revolutionary for a Hollywood ending. The "home" team—the protagonists we've followed—doesn't win first place. They get second. And they’re happy about it because they earned it honestly.
The Sound of the 2000s
Music plays a massive role in why this movie lingers in the collective memory. From the opening "Mickey" remix to the "Cliff’s Notes" mixtape, the soundtrack is a time capsule of Y2K pop and hip-hop.
It’s also functional. The music dictates the rhythm of the editing. The way the cuts happen during the final competition sequence mimics the high-energy "8-count" that cheerleaders live by. It’s rhythmic. It’s exhausting to watch. You feel the sweat.
Addressing the Sequels (Or Trying To)
There have been many sequels. Five? Six? Honestly, I’ve lost count. Most of them went straight to DVD or streaming. While Bring It On: All or Nothing had a young Rihanna and some decent choreography, none of them captured the lightning-in-a-bottle social commentary of the original.
🔗 Read more: Pat Benatar Treat Me Right: Why This 1980 Rocker Still Slaps
The first film worked because it was self-aware. It knew that cheerleading was "silly" to outsiders, but it treated the internal politics with the gravity of a Shakespearean drama. The sequels often leaned too hard into the silliness and lost the heart.
Legacy and the "Spirit Stick" Mythos
We have to talk about the spirit stick. It’s a trope now. If you drop the spirit stick, you’re cursed. It’s such a simple narrative device, but it perfectly encapsulates the superstitions of high school sports.
The movie understands that for a seventeen-year-old, the world ends at the edge of the football field. Every minor "curse" or social slight feels like a catastrophe. By grounding the theft of the routines in this high-stakes environment, the filmmakers made the moral failure of the Toros feel genuinely devastating.
The Impact on Modern Media
You can see the DNA of Bring It On in shows like Cheer on Netflix. The docuseries format proved what the movie was trying to say all along: this is a grueling, dangerous, and highly technical sport. The "cheer-moms" and the intense pressure to be perfect weren't just movie inventions; they were observations of a very real, very intense American subculture.
Even the way we discuss cultural appropriation on TikTok and Twitter today owes a small debt to this film. It provided a clear, easy-to-understand metaphor for how dominant cultures often "borrow" from marginalized ones without credit, then package it for a mainstream audience.
Actionable Takeaways for Fans and Creators
If you are a writer, a filmmaker, or just someone who loves the movie, there are a few things to take away from why Bring It On actually worked.
🔗 Read more: Why The House (2017) Failed at the Box Office Despite a Perfect Comedy Pairing
1. Don't underestimate your audience. The creators could have made a brainless comedy. Instead, they made a movie about white privilege and intellectual property. Audiences, even teenagers, can handle complex themes if they’re wrapped in an entertaining package.
2. Specificity breeds universality. The more specific the movie was about the rules of cheerleading, the more people related to it. You don't have to be a cheerleader to understand the pressure of living up to a legacy or the shame of realizing you’re on the wrong side of history.
3. Authenticity over perfection. The actors did a lot of their own stunts. They looked tired. They looked like they were working. That grit made the "perfection" of the final routines feel earned.
4. Re-evaluate your favorites. Go back and watch the movie with a 2026 lens. Notice how the camera treats the Clovers versus the Toros. Notice the subtle ways the script acknowledges that the Clovers have to be twice as good to get half as much credit.
The movie isn't perfect. There are some jokes that definitely wouldn't fly today. Some of the gender politics are a bit creaky. But at its core, it remains a surprisingly honest look at competition and the cost of winning.
To really appreciate the impact, watch the final competition scenes of both teams back-to-back. Look at the "cleanliness" of the Toros versus the "innovation" of the Clovers. It’s a masterclass in visual storytelling about different styles of excellence. If you’re looking to dive deeper into the history of the sport, check out the work of sports historians who track the evolution of the "National Cheerleaders Association" (NCA), which is the real-life backdrop for the movie’s fictional "Nationals."
Next time you hear a cheer, don't just think about the pom-poms. Think about the choreography. Think about where it came from. And for the love of everything, don't drop the spirit stick.