It feels like a lifetime ago, doesn't it? Back in early 2019, the political world was holding its collective breath. Every time a microphone was put in front of Hillary Clinton, the same question popped up. Would she try again? Could there be a 2016 rematch?
The short answer is she just didn't want to. Honestly, that sounds oversimplified, but when you look at the timeline, it makes sense. On March 5, 2019, she sat down for an interview with News12 Westchester and finally put the rumors to bed. "I'm not running," she said. Simple. Direct. No wiggle room.
But why?
Why didn't hillary run in 2020 and the 2016 "hangover"
You have to look at the context of that 2016 loss. It wasn't just a defeat; it was a trauma for the Democratic party and for Clinton herself. She won the popular vote by nearly 3 million people. That's a lot of humans. Yet, she lost the Electoral College. That kind of result leaves a mark.
📖 Related: Red Army in Russian: What Most People Get Wrong About the Workers' and Peasants' Military
By the time the 2020 cycle started warming up, Clinton was 71 years old. She had spent decades in the public eye—First Lady, Senator, Secretary of State. She was tired of being the lightning rod. Every time she spoke, the "Lock her up" chants would start again at Trump rallies. Basically, she became a distraction for the party she wanted to help.
There was also the "Bernie factor." The 2016 primary was brutal. It divided the Democrats into two very distinct camps: the establishment moderates and the progressive wing. If she had jumped in for 2020, those old wounds would have been ripped wide open immediately. Nobody in the DNC wanted a repeat of the infighting that many felt hobbled her against Trump the first time around.
The crowded field was already full
By early 2019, the Democratic primary was already looking like a subway car during rush hour. You had:
💡 You might also like: Photo 509: What Really Happened to the Missing Image
- Joe Biden (who was essentially occupying the same "moderate elder statesman" lane as Clinton)
- Bernie Sanders (still leading the progressive charge)
- Elizabeth Warren
- Kamala Harris
- Pete Buttigieg
There wasn't a "Hillary-shaped" hole in the race. Biden, specifically, was the big hurdle. He had the Obama connection and the appeal to blue-collar voters in the Rust Belt—the very voters Clinton struggled to hold in 2016. If Biden was in, Clinton didn't see a clear path. She even mentioned in interviews that she had spoken with several of the candidates and was content to be an advisor rather than a protagonist.
Life after the campaign trail
Kinda interestingly, Clinton seemed... happy? Or at least relieved. During her 2019 book tour for The Book of Gutsy Women, which she co-authored with her daughter Chelsea, she looked more relaxed than she ever did in a pantsuit on a debate stage. She talked about her grandkids. She talked about her podcast.
She told Norah O'Donnell on CBS that she was going to do "everything I can" to make sure the next president respected the rule of law, but she didn't feel the need to be that person. She had moved into the "elder stateswoman" phase of her career.
Dealing with the "Crooked Hillary" narrative
Let's be real: the baggage was heavy. The private email server controversy followed her like a ghost. Even though she was never charged with a crime, the James Comey letter from October 2016 was a shadow she couldn't outrun. Every time she trended on Twitter, the same old arguments about transparency and trust resurfaced.
🔗 Read more: Why SF Mayor Ed Lee Still Matters for the City's Future
In her own words, she didn't want to give the Trump campaign an easy target. By staying out of the race, she forced the GOP to find a new villain, which proved harder to do with "Middle Class Joe" Biden than it was with a woman who had been a conservative boogeyman since the early 90s.
The logic of the decision
If you're looking for a single "smoking gun" reason, you won't find one. It was a combination of things:
- Strategic Realism: She saw that Joe Biden already held her base of support.
- Personal Peace: She was enjoying life outside the "war room."
- Party Unity: She knew her presence would be polarizing and might help Trump's reelection chances.
- Age and Legacy: At 72, another grueling two-year campaign was a massive ask.
She didn't disappear, though. She was a huge presence at the 2020 DNC (virtually, thanks to COVID) and was one of the first major figures to endorse Biden once it was clear he'd be the nominee. She traded the candidate's podium for the behind-the-scenes strategy sessions, which, honestly, seemed to suit her better at that stage of her life.
If you are still curious about how that 2020 cycle shifted the Democratic party's future, your best bet is to look at the voting data from the 2020 Michigan and Pennsylvania primaries. Comparing those numbers to the 2016 results shows exactly why the party moved toward Biden's coalition rather than attempting a Clinton redux. You can find those breakdowns on sites like the Cook Political Report or through the MIT Election Data and Science Lab.